IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i24p10625-d464894.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prediction of Remaining Life for Bridge Decks Considering Deterioration Factors and Propose of Prioritization Process for Bridge Deck Maintenance

Author

Listed:
  • Ki Hwan Kim

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hanyang University, Ansan 15588, Korea
    R&D Division, Korea Expressway Corporation, Hwaseong 18489, Korea)

  • Moon S. Nam

    (R&D Division, Korea Expressway Corporation, Hwaseong 18489, Korea)

  • Hoon Hee Hwang

    (R&D Center, Korea Road Association, Seongnam 13647, Korea)

  • Ki Yong Ann

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hanyang University, Ansan 15588, Korea)

Abstract

Aged highway bridges have become substantially prevalent in recent years. Moreover, combined deterioration, caused by using deicing agents in winter, has led to increased bridge maintenance costs. Accordingly, to extend the service life of bridge decks, this study utilized actual inspection data and major deterioration factors to derive the remaining service life of bridge decks. Based on this study, the following three factors are selected: deicing agent exposure grade, pavement condition state, and surface improvement status. Performance degradation curves were derived for 11 cases that considered the representative three deterioration factors, and the performance degradation of decks was examined for each deterioration factor. Additionally, a process to determine maintenance priorities, using the current condition of highway bridges and the deterioration factors of individual bridges, was proposed. The maintenance demand was predicted based on the end of deck life, which indicated that the demand for deck replacement will sharply increase in 15 years, and that the decks of more than 2000 bridges will reach the end of life in 40 years. Furthermore, this paper proposes a process for prioritizing the maintenance of approximately 9000 highway bridge decks. By applying the prioritization process for bridge deck maintenance to the bridge deck, not only can the life of the bridge deck be extended, but also environmental pollution can be minimized. Additionally, an optimizing design for bridge decks, by considering the remaining life and deterioration factors, can be possible. Therefore, it is expected that the sustainability of the bridge deck can be accomplished.

Suggested Citation

  • Ki Hwan Kim & Moon S. Nam & Hoon Hee Hwang & Ki Yong Ann, 2020. "Prediction of Remaining Life for Bridge Decks Considering Deterioration Factors and Propose of Prioritization Process for Bridge Deck Maintenance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-25, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10625-:d:464894
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10625/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10625/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhenlong Shen & Yongjian Liu & Jiang Liu & Zeyu Liu & Shi Han & Shiyong Lan, 2023. "A Decision-Making Method for Bridge Network Maintenance Based on Disease Transmission and NSGA-II," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Eslam Mohammed Abdelkader & Abobakr Al-Sakkaf & Ghasan Alfalah & Nehal Elshaboury, 2022. "Hybrid Differential Evolution-Based Regression Tree Model for Predicting Downstream Dam Hazard Potential," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10625-:d:464894. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.