IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i24p10284-d459170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Wetland Restoration and Conservation Projects on Soil Carbon Sequestration in the Ningxia Basin of the Yellow River in China from 2000 to 2015

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoyan Bu

    (School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China)

  • Dan Cui

    (School of Government, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Suocheng Dong

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Wenbao Mi

    (School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China)

  • Yu Li

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Zhigang Li

    (School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China)

  • Yaliang Feng

    (School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China)

Abstract

The long-term use of wetlands stresses wetland ecosystems and leads to degradation and C loss. This study explored an optimal remote sensing-multivariate linear regression model (RS-MLRM) for estimating wetland soil organic carbon (SOC) by using a combination of the measured SOC and above ground biomass (AGB) from 273 samples, textural features, spectral information, and a vegetation index calculated from Landsat-8 images using the Ningxia Basin of the Yellow River as the study area. To derive the optimal predictor model for SOC, these variables were regressed against the measured SOC. These were used to predict SOC and evaluate the contribution of wetland restoration and conservation projects to soil carbon sequestration and sinks on the Ningxia Basin of the Yellow River in early (2000 and 2005), intermediate (2010), and recent (2015) years. The results show that from 2000 to 2015, the project-induced contribution to C sequestration was 20.49 TC, with an annual sink of 1.37 TC. This accounted for 54.06% of the total wetland ecosystem C sequestration on the Ningxia Basin of the Yellow River. Moreover, there was a significant success of restoration and conservation projects regarding C sequestration. These restoration and conservation projects have substantially contributed to CO 2 mitigation in the arid area.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoyan Bu & Dan Cui & Suocheng Dong & Wenbao Mi & Yu Li & Zhigang Li & Yaliang Feng, 2020. "Effects of Wetland Restoration and Conservation Projects on Soil Carbon Sequestration in the Ningxia Basin of the Yellow River in China from 2000 to 2015," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-25, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10284-:d:459170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10284/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10284/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elizabeth Gibney, 2018. "What to expect in 2018: science in the new year," Nature, Nature, vol. 553(7686), pages 12-13, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tianlin Zhai & Jing Wang & Ying Fang & Longyang Huang & Jingjing Liu & Chenchen Zhao, 2021. "Integrating Ecosystem Services Supply, Demand and Flow in Ecological Compensation: A Case Study of Carbon Sequestration Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10284-:d:459170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.