IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i24p10271-d459013.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Citizen Science Monitoring for Sustainable Development Goal Indicator 6.3.2 in England and Zambia

Author

Listed:
  • Isabel J. Bishop

    (Earthwatch Europe, Oxford OX2 7DE, UK)

  • Stuart Warner

    (United Nations Environment Programme GEMS/Water Capacity Development Centre, School of Biological, Earth & Environmental Sciences and Environmental Research Institute University College Cork, T23 XE10 Cork, Ireland)

  • Toos C. G. E. van Noordwijk

    (Earthwatch Europe, Oxford OX2 7DE, UK)

  • Frank C. Nyoni

    (Water Resources Management Authority (WARMA), Lusaka 10101, Zambia)

  • Steven Loiselle

    (Earthwatch Europe, Oxford OX2 7DE, UK)

Abstract

Citizen science has the potential to support the delivery of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through its integration into national monitoring schemes. In this study, we explored the opportunities and biases of citizen science (CS) data when used either as a primary or secondary source for SDG 6.3.2 reporting. We used data from waterbodies with both CS and regulatory monitoring in England and Zambia to explore their biases and complementarity. A comparative analysis of regulatory and CS data provided key information on appropriate sampling frequency, site selection, and measurement parameters necessary for robust SDG reporting. The results showed elevated agreement for pass/fail ratios and indicator scores for English waterbodies (80%) and demonstrated that CS data improved for granularity and spatial coverage for SDG indicator scoring, even when extensive statutory monitoring programs were present. In Zambia, management authorities are actively using citizen science projects to increase spatial and temporal coverage for SDG reporting. Our results indicate that design considerations for SDG focused citizen science can address local needs and provide a more representative indicator of the state of a nation’s freshwater ecosystems for international reporting requirements.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabel J. Bishop & Stuart Warner & Toos C. G. E. van Noordwijk & Frank C. Nyoni & Steven Loiselle, 2020. "Citizen Science Monitoring for Sustainable Development Goal Indicator 6.3.2 in England and Zambia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10271-:d:459013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10271/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10271/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kirschke, S. & Avellan, T. & Barlund, I. & Bogardi, J. J. & Carvalho, L. & Chapman, D. & Dickens, Chris W. S. & Irvine, K. & Lee, S. & Mehner, T. & Warner, S., 2020. "Capacity challenges in water quality monitoring: understanding the role of human development," Papers published in Journals (Open Access), International Water Management Institute, pages 192(5):298..
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stephen Parkinson & Sasha Marie Woods & James Sprinks & Luigi Ceccaroni, 2022. "A Practical Approach to Assessing the Impact of Citizen Science towards the Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-26, April.
    2. Francesco Di Grazia & Bruna Gumiero & Luisa Galgani & Elena Troiani & Michele Ferri & Steven A. Loiselle, 2021. "Ecosystem Services Evaluation of Nature-Based Solutions with the Help of Citizen Scientists," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-21, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10271-:d:459013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.