IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i23p10208-d458029.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Automatic Acquisition of Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Ontology for Sustainable Risk Management

Author

Listed:
  • Zobia Rehman

    (Department of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
    Faculty of Engineering, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 550024 Sibiu, Romania)

  • Claudiu Vasile Kifor

    (Faculty of Engineering, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 550024 Sibiu, Romania)

  • Farhana Jabeen

    (Department of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

  • Sheneela Naz

    (Department of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

  • Muhammad Waqar

    (Department of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

Abstract

In this piece of research, we have presented an approach to populate Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) ontology from existing worksheets prepared by experts. FMEA is a commonly used method for risk assessment in any organization. This method is initiated by domain experts who analyze all the associated risks to a product or process, their causes, severity, effects and mitigation actions. Besides domain experts, time and cost are the other two factors involved in successful completion of FMEA. Reusability of the knowledge produced at the end of this method can bring numerous benefits to an organization. Some ontologies are available for semantic content management of FMEA knowledge but in order to avail their full benefits, it is must that they can acquire the existing knowledge automatically. Major objective of this article is to develop an algorithm, which can populate FMEA ontology from existing worksheets. Major contribution of this work is to identify an existing FMEA ontology and its evaluation for schema and relationship richness, then its automatic population using proposed algorithm without human intervention, and finally making it a part of complete knowledge management system. Our proposed algorithm correctly mapped 1357 instances to FMEA ontology from manually prepared FMEA spreadsheets. This FMEA ontology has been queried by domain experts and it was proved to be very helpful in experts like decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Zobia Rehman & Claudiu Vasile Kifor & Farhana Jabeen & Sheneela Naz & Muhammad Waqar, 2020. "Automatic Acquisition of Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Ontology for Sustainable Risk Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:23:p:10208-:d:458029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/23/10208/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/23/10208/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agnieszka Konys, 2018. "An Ontology-Based Knowledge Modelling for a Sustainability Assessment Domain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-27, January.
    2. Thanh-Lam Nguyen & Ming-Hung Shu & Bi-Min Hsu, 2016. "Extended FMEA for Sustainable Manufacturing: An Empirical Study in the Non-Woven Fabrics Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-14, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Svatava Janoušková & Tomáš Hák & Bedřich Moldan, 2018. "Global SDGs Assessments: Helping or Confusing Indicators?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Antonio De Nicola & Maria Luisa Villani, 2021. "Smart City Ontologies and Their Applications: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-40, May.
    3. Agnieszka Konys, 2019. "Green Supplier Selection Criteria: From a Literature Review to a Comprehensive Knowledge Base," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-41, August.
    4. Radostina A. Angelova & Daniela Sofronova, 2023. "Sustainable Textiles: Design of New Weave Patterns Based on Texts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Toly Chen, 2016. "Competitive and Sustainable Manufacturing in the Age of Globalization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-5, December.
    6. Paria Azizpour & Mustafa Jahangoshai Rezaee, 2024. "Enhancing Choquet integral in risk assessment of auto parts manufacturing process in the network structure of failure modes," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 15(6), pages 2271-2283, June.
    7. Kwoting Fang & Shuoche Lin, 2019. "An Integrated Approach for Modeling Ontology-Based Task Knowledge on an Incident Command System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-26, June.
    8. Lusia Permata Sari Hartanti & Ivan Gunawan & Ig. Jaka Mulyana & Herwinarso Herwinarso, 2022. "Identification of Waste Based on Lean Principles as the Way towards Sustainability of a Higher Education Institution: A Case Study from Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, April.
    9. Yigitcanlar, Tan & Han, Hoon & Kamruzzaman, Md. & Ioppolo, Giuseppe & Sabatini-Marques, Jamile, 2019. "The making of smart cities: Are Songdo, Masdar, Amsterdam, San Francisco and Brisbane the best we could build?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:23:p:10208-:d:458029. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.