IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i22p9710-d448681.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Implication of Petrographic Characteristics on the Mechanical Behavior of Middle Eocene Limestone, 15th May City, Egypt

Author

Listed:
  • Abdelaziz El Shinawi

    (The Environmental Geophysics Lab (ZEGL), Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44511, Egypt)

  • Peter Mésároš

    (Institute of Technology, Economics and Management in Construction, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Technical, University of Košice, 042 00 Košice, Slovakia)

  • Martina Zeleňáková

    (Institute of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Technical, University of Košice, 042 00 Košice, Slovakia)

Abstract

The construction purposes of carbonate rocks are considered a major aspect of using these bedrocks based on their mechanical behavior. Accordingly, the physical and mechanical characterization of Middle Eocene Limestone bedrock in the new urban area at the 15th May City, Egypt was studied to assess the suitability of the carbonate rocks for construction. This study has been carried out to investigate the effect of petrographic characteristics on mechanical properties. To achieve this objective, the intact 30 rock core samples from 15 boreholes were selected at different depths. Based on study of the selected samples in thin sections, the limestone in the area was classified as lime-mudstone, wackestone, and grainstone. Additionally, the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) and Schmidt Rebound Hammer (Rn) were determined to detect the mechanical properties of the limestone bedrock. The measured parameters (UCS and Rn) demonstrated a high direct relationship with mudstone and a poor direct relationship with dolomite and high negative correlation with wackestone and grainstone. Therefore, the Middle Eocene Limestone bedrock is more durable and has medium-strength, which made it suitable for constructions. Regression analysis was performed to find out some linear relationship between mechanical properties (UCS) with petrographic characteristics. The study reveals significant positive correlation between UCS and Rn with mudstone in accordance higher values of regression coefficient (R 2 = 0.91 and R 2 = 0.036), and an inverse relationship of Rn with dolomite % (R 2 = 0.89 and R 2 = 0.02), respectively. Consequently, the strong confidence on the mechanical parameters opens the way for engineers to predict the mechanical parameters that are required for engineering properties of limestone for the urban expansion.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdelaziz El Shinawi & Peter Mésároš & Martina Zeleňáková, 2020. "The Implication of Petrographic Characteristics on the Mechanical Behavior of Middle Eocene Limestone, 15th May City, Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-15, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:22:p:9710-:d:448681
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/22/9710/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/22/9710/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Teresa Stingl Freitas & Ana Sofia Guimarães & Staf Roels & Vasco Peixoto de Freitas & Andrea Cataldo, 2020. "Is the Time-Domain Reflectometry (TDR) Technique Suitable for Moisture Content Measurement in Low-Porosity Building Materials?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Marzouk Mohamed Aly Abdelhamid & Dong Li & Gaofeng Ren, 2020. "Predicting Unconfined Compressive Strength Decrease of Carbonate Building Materials against Frost Attack Using Nondestructive Physical Tests," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Shaikha Al-Nuaimi & Abdul-Aziz A. Banawi & Sami G. Al-Ghamdi, 2019. "Environmental and Economic Life Cycle Analysis of Primary Construction Materials Sourcing under Geopolitical Uncertainties: A Case Study of Qatar," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-26, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. María Pilar de la Cruz López & Juan José Cartelle Barros & Alfredo del Caño Gochi & Manuel Lara Coira, 2021. "New Approach for Managing Sustainability in Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-27, June.
    2. Maryam Hussain Abal-Seqan & Shaligram Pokharel & Khalid Kamal Naji, 2023. "Key Success Factors and Their Impact on the Performance of Construction Projects: Case in Qatar," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Zhi-Hua Xu & Guang-Liang Feng & Qian-Cheng Sun & Guo-Dong Zhang & Yu-Ming He, 2020. "A Modified Model for Predicting the Strength of Drying-Wetting Cycled Sandstone Based on the P-Wave Velocity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Abdul-Aziz Banawi & Alia Besné & David Fonseca & Jose Ferrandiz, 2020. "A Three Methods Proactive Improvement Model for Buildings Construction Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-14, May.
    5. Kai-Hua Wang & Jia-Min Kan & Cui-Feng Jiang & Chi-Wei Su, 2022. "Is Geopolitical Risk Powerful Enough to Affect Carbon Dioxide Emissions? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-16, June.
    6. Alena Oulehlova & Irena Tušer & David Rehak, 2021. "Environmental Risk Assessment of a Diesel Fuel Tank: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, June.
    7. Chen, Limei & Gozgor, Giray & Mahalik, Mantu Kumar & Pal, Shreya & Rather, Kashif Nesar, 2023. "How does geopolitical risk affect CO2 emissions? The role of natural resource rents," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(PB).
    8. Qamri, Ghulam Muhammad & Sheng, Bin & Adeel-Farooq, Rana Muhammad & Alam, Gazi Mahabubul, 2022. "The criticality of FDI in Environmental Degradation through financial development and economic growth: Implications for promoting the green sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:22:p:9710-:d:448681. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.