IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i22p9538-d445898.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Industry 4.0 Implementation in B2B Companies: Cross-Country Empirical Evidence on Digital Transformation in the CEE Region

Author

Listed:
  • Roland Zs. Szabo

    (Strategic Management Department, Corvinus University of Budapest, 1093 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Iva Vuksanović Herceg

    (Faculty of Economics, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Robert Hanák

    (Faculty of Business Management, University of Economics in Bratislava, 852 35 Bratislava, Slovakia)

  • Lilla Hortovanyi

    (Strategic Management Department, Corvinus University of Budapest, 1093 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Anita Romanová

    (Faculty of Business Management, University of Economics in Bratislava, 852 35 Bratislava, Slovakia)

  • Marian Mocan

    (Faculty of Management in Production and Transportation, Politehnica University Timisoara, 300191 Timisoara, Romania)

  • Dragan Djuričin

    (Faculty of Economics, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

Abstract

Previous research has pointed out that Industry 4.0 will lead to more sustainable production; however, it may have profound effects on European competitiveness. Today, firms in the CEE countries face a limited scope for continued economic expansion, and hence there is a growing pressure on them to move upward in the global value chain by investing heavily in advanced technology. Consequently, the authors argue that B2B firms from the CEE countries can have a massive impact on Europe’s long-term competitiveness by reversing the effect of digital transformation due to their strong interdependencies on other European economies. Therefore, in a cross-country survey, research data were collected ( n = 302) about the driving forces, barriers, and role of stakeholders in the implementation of digital transformations. The authors found that some technologies are implemented much more frequently compared to others, with some indication for country specialization. The leading driving force is customer satisfaction followed by productivity and financial motives. Shortage of skilled human resources and high implementation costs are the main barriers. The firms tend to rely on universities and research centers, while the government is perceived only as a financial provider. The results are also informative for practitioners and policymakers—providing them with benchmarks.

Suggested Citation

  • Roland Zs. Szabo & Iva Vuksanović Herceg & Robert Hanák & Lilla Hortovanyi & Anita Romanová & Marian Mocan & Dragan Djuričin, 2020. "Industry 4.0 Implementation in B2B Companies: Cross-Country Empirical Evidence on Digital Transformation in the CEE Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-20, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:22:p:9538-:d:445898
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/22/9538/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/22/9538/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grinstein, Amir & Goldman, Arieh, 2006. "Characterizing the technology firm: An exploratory study," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 121-143, February.
    2. Héctor Cañas & Josefa Mula & Francisco Campuzano-Bolarín, 2020. "A General Outline of a Sustainable Supply Chain 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Raj, Alok & Dwivedi, Gourav & Sharma, Ankit & Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz & Rajak, Sonu, 2020. "Barriers to the adoption of industry 4.0 technologies in the manufacturing sector: An inter-country comparative perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    4. Karl Widerquist, 2018. "The Bottom Line," Exploring the Basic Income Guarantee, in: A Critical Analysis of Basic Income Experiments for Researchers, Policymakers, and Citizens, chapter 0, pages 93-98, Palgrave Macmillan.
    5. Ossewaarde, Marinus, 2019. "Digital transformation and the renewal of social theory: Unpacking the new fraudulent myths and misplaced metaphors," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 24-30.
    6. Luca Benedictis & Lucia Tajoli, 2007. "Economic integration and similarity in trade structures," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 34(2), pages 117-137, April.
    7. Peter Backé & Iikka Korhonen & Doris Ritzberger-Grünwald & Laura Solanko, 2019. "A tribute to 30 years of transition in CESEE," Focus on European Economic Integration, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue Q3/19, pages 11-28.
    8. Katrin Oettmeier & Erik Hofmann, 2017. "Additive manufacturing technology adoption: an empirical analysis of general and supply chain-related determinants," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(1), pages 97-124, January.
    9. Gunnar Prause & Gunnar Prause & Sina Atari, 2017. "On sustainable production networks for Industry 4.0," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 4(4), pages 421-431, June.
    10. Li Da Xu, 2020. "The contribution of systems science to Industry 4.0," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 618-631, July.
    11. Dalenogare, Lucas Santos & Benitez, Guilherme Brittes & Ayala, Néstor Fabián & Frank, Alejandro Germán, 2018. "The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 383-394.
    12. Morteza Ghobakhloo, 2020. "Determinants of information and digital technology implementation for smart manufacturing," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(8), pages 2384-2405, April.
    13. Kamble, Sachin S. & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Ghadge, Abhijeet & Raut, Rakesh, 2020. "A performance measurement system for industry 4.0 enabled smart manufacturing system in SMMEs- A review and empirical investigation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    14. Müller, Julian Marius & Buliga, Oana & Voigt, Kai-Ingo, 2018. "Fortune favors the prepared: How SMEs approach business model innovations in Industry 4.0," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 2-17.
    15. Artur Pollak & Agata Hilarowicz & Maciej Walczak & Damian Gąsiorek, 2020. "A Framework of Action for Implementation of Industry 4.0. an Empirically Based Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-16, July.
    16. Judit Nagy & Judit Oláh & Edina Erdei & Domicián Máté & József Popp, 2018. "The Role and Impact of Industry 4.0 and the Internet of Things on the Business Strategy of the Value Chain—The Case of Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-25, September.
    17. Tortorella, Guilherme Luz & Cawley Vergara, Alejandro Mac & Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo & Sawhney, Rapinder, 2020. "Organizational learning paths based upon industry 4.0 adoption: An empirical study with Brazilian manufacturers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 284-294.
    18. Donald C. Hambrick, 2010. "Top Management Teams," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Frank Bournois & Jérôme Duval-Hamel & Sylvie Roussillon & Jean-Louis Scaringella (ed.), Handbook of Top Management Teams, chapter 1, pages 23-30, Palgrave Macmillan.
    19. Iva Vuksanović Herceg & Vukašin Kuč & Veljko M. Mijušković & Tomislav Herceg, 2020. "Challenges and Driving Forces for Industry 4.0 Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-22, May.
    20. Olena Liakh & Francesca Spigarelli, 2020. "Managing Corporate Sustainability and Responsibility Efficiently: A Review of Existing Literature on Business Groups and Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-42, September.
    21. Joseph Evans Agolla, 2018. "Human Capital in the Smart Manufacturing and Industry 4.0 Revolution," Chapters, in: Antonella Petrillo & Raffaele Cioffi & Fabio De Felice (ed.), Digital Transformation in Smart Manufacturing, IntechOpen.
    22. Poorya Ghafoorpoor Yazdi & Aydin Azizi & Majid Hashemipour, 2018. "An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Overall Equipment Efficiency (OEE) and Manufacturing Sustainability in Industry 4.0 with Time Study Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-28, August.
    23. Gunnar Prause & Sina Atari, 2017. "On sustainable production networks for Industry 4.0," Post-Print hal-01860909, HAL.
    24. Caviggioli, Federico & Ughetto, Elisa, 2019. "A bibliometric analysis of the research dealing with the impact of additive manufacturing on industry, business and society," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 254-268.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Özköse, Hakan & Güney, Gül, 2023. "The effects of industry 4.0 on productivity: A scientific mapping study," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Culot, Giovanna & Orzes, Guido & Sartor, Marco & Nassimbeni, Guido, 2020. "The future of manufacturing: A Delphi-based scenario analysis on Industry 4.0," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    2. Calabrese, Armando & Costa, Roberta & Tiburzi, Luigi & Brem, Alexander, 2023. "Merging two revolutions: A human-artificial intelligence method to study how sustainability and Industry 4.0 are intertwined," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Bag, Surajit & Gupta, Shivam & Kumar, Sameer, 2021. "Industry 4.0 adoption and 10R advance manufacturing capabilities for sustainable development," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    4. Alok Raj & Anand Jeyaraj, 2023. "Antecedents and consequents of industry 4.0 adoption using technology, organization and environment (TOE) framework: A meta-analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 322(1), pages 101-124, March.
    5. José Salvador da Motta Reis & Maximilian Espuny & Thaís Vieira Nunhes & Nilo Antonio de Souza Sampaio & Raine Isaksson & Fernando Celso de Campos & Otávio José de Oliveira, 2021. "Striding towards Sustainability: A Framework to Overcome Challenges and Explore Opportunities through Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-28, May.
    6. Piccarozzi, Michela & Silvestri, Cecilia & Aquilani, Barbara & Silvestri, Luca, 2022. "Is this a new story of the ‘Two Giants’? A systematic literature review of the relationship between industry 4.0, sustainability and its pillars," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    7. Iva Vuksanović Herceg & Vukašin Kuč & Veljko M. Mijušković & Tomislav Herceg, 2020. "Challenges and Driving Forces for Industry 4.0 Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-22, May.
    8. Marino-Romero, Jorge Alberto & Palos-Sánchez, Pedro R. & Velicia-Martín, Félix, 2024. "Evolution of digital transformation in SMEs management through a bibliometric analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    9. Virmani, Naveen & Sharma, Shikha & Kumar, Anil & Luthra, Sunil, 2023. "Adoption of industry 4.0 evidence in emerging economy: Behavioral reasoning theory perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    10. Colombari, Ruggero & Geuna, Aldo & Helper, Susan & Martins, Raphael & Paolucci, Emilio & Ricci, Riccardo & Seamans, Robert, 2023. "The interplay between data-driven decision-making and digitalization: A firm-level survey of the Italian and U.S. automotive industries," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    11. Peerally, Jahan Ara & Santiago, Fernando & De Fuentes, Claudia & Moghavvemi, Sedigheh, 2022. "Towards a firm-level technological capability framework to endorse and actualize the Fourth Industrial Revolution in developing countries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(10).
    12. Calış Duman, Meral & Akdemir, Bunyamin, 2021. "A study to determine the effects of industry 4.0 technology components on organizational performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    13. Xiaoxia Chen & Mélanie Despeisse & Björn Johansson, 2020. "Environmental Sustainability of Digitalization in Manufacturing: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-31, December.
    14. Shih-Chia Chang & Hsu-Hwa Chang & Ming-Tsang Lu, 2021. "Evaluating Industry 4.0 Technology Application in SMEs: Using a Hybrid MCDM Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-21, February.
    15. Cugno, Monica & Castagnoli, Rebecca & Büchi, Giacomo, 2021. "Openness to Industry 4.0 and performance: The impact of barriers and incentives," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    16. Stornelli, Aldo & Ozcan, Sercan & Simms, Christopher, 2021. "Advanced manufacturing technology adoption and innovation: A systematic literature review on barriers, enablers, and innovation types," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(6).
    17. Oliveira-Dias, Diéssica de & Maqueira-Marin, Juan Manuel & Moyano-Fuentes, José & Carvalho, Helena, 2023. "Implications of using Industry 4.0 base technologies for lean and agile supply chains and performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    18. Michela Piccarozzi & Barbara Aquilani & Corrado Gatti, 2018. "Industry 4.0 in Management Studies: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, October.
    19. Cifone, Fabiana Dafne & Hoberg, Kai & Holweg, Matthias & Staudacher, Alberto Portioli, 2021. "‘Lean 4.0’: How can digital technologies support lean practices?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    20. Mariani, Marcello & Borghi, Matteo, 2019. "Industry 4.0: A bibliometric review of its managerial intellectual structure and potential evolution in the service industries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:22:p:9538-:d:445898. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.