IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i20p8646-d431018.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Biological Reference Points for Conservation and Management of the Bigeye Thresher Shark, Alopias superciliosus , in the Northwest Pacific

Author

Listed:
  • Wen-Pei Tsai

    (Department of Fisheries Production and Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 81157, Taiwan)

  • Kwang-Ming Liu

    (Institute of Marine Affairs and Resource Management, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan
    George Chen Shark Research Center, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan
    Center of Excellence for the Oceans, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan)

  • Yi-Jay Chang

    (Institute of Oceanography, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan)

Abstract

Full stock assessment of sharks is usually hindered by a lack of long time-series catch and effort data. In these circumstances, demographic and per-recruit analyses may provide alternate approaches to describe population status because these methods can be applied to estimate biological reference points (BRPs) for shark stocks. However, the appropriate level of BRPs for sharks is difficult to determine, given the expected low reproductive rates. To determine which BRPs are most appropriate for the CITES-listed species—bigeye thresher shark, Alopias superciliosus , a stochastic demographic model with Monte Carlo simulations and per-recruit models were used to estimate BRPs in this study. The results indicated that conventional fishing mortality-based BRPs ( F BRPs ) derived from per-recruit models may result in a clear population decline. Our analyses also demonstrated that the bigeye thresher population in the Northwest Pacific will stabilize only if demographic-based F BRP is implemented. The F BRP estimated based on the stochastic demographic model was 0.079–0.139 y −1 , which was equivalent to SPR = 50–70%. The findings strongly suggested that more conservative threshold F BRPs should be implemented to ensure sustainable utilization of the bigeye thresher stock. The present study provides new and strategically important information on the population dynamics of the bigeye thresher in the Northwest Pacific, which can be used to help fishery managers to adopt more efficient management measures for this stock. It is also suggested that this approach can be applied to other shark species with limited catch and effort data.

Suggested Citation

  • Wen-Pei Tsai & Kwang-Ming Liu & Yi-Jay Chang, 2020. "Evaluation of Biological Reference Points for Conservation and Management of the Bigeye Thresher Shark, Alopias superciliosus , in the Northwest Pacific," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-29, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:20:p:8646-:d:431018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8646/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8646/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kwang-Ming Liu & Chien-Pang Chin & Chun-Hui Chen & Jui-Han Chang, 2015. "Estimating Finite Rate of Population Increase for Sharks Based on Vital Parameters," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:20:p:8646-:d:431018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.