IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i20p8425-d427165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competitiveness Analysis of GDSs in South Korea by Using Niche Theory: Focusing on User Gratification

Author

Listed:
  • Hyo-Jeong Byun

    (Department of Tourism Industry Research Center, Kyonggi University, Seoul 03746, Korea)

  • Jeong-Joon Kim

    (Department of Airline Services, Seowon University, Cheong-ju 28674, Korea)

  • Byeong-Cheol Lee

    (Department of Tourism and Event Management, Kyonggi University, Seoul 03746, Korea)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the competitive relationships among the four major Global Distribution Systems (GDSs), which are representative reservation systems in the tourism industry by using niche theory. To that end, niche theory, which presents the three core concepts of niche breadth, niche overlap, and niche superiority, was combined with gratification in the uses to apply the gratification niche analysis technique. Based on an extensive literature review, four factors (core functions, system functions, service functions, and additional functions) to measure user satisfaction levels by function with GDSs were extracted. Online/offline questionnaire surveys were conducted with travel agencies’ airline counter staffs who had experience using all four GDSs, and in total, 324 copies of the questionnaire were used in the analysis. The analysis results confirmed that Sabre had a competitive edge in general over the other three GDSs, while TOPAS (Amadeus) and Galileo had a comparative competitive edge in certain functions. This study suggested concrete implications that can help individual GDSs in terms of their development of functions or the establishment of marketing strategies by verifying user satisfaction by the function of individual GDSs.

Suggested Citation

  • Hyo-Jeong Byun & Jeong-Joon Kim & Byeong-Cheol Lee, 2020. "Competitiveness Analysis of GDSs in South Korea by Using Niche Theory: Focusing on User Gratification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:20:p:8425-:d:427165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8425/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8425/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sion Beatrice & Mihălcescu Cezar & Mărginean Alexandra, 2013. "The Passage From Airline Reservation Systems To Global Distribution Systems," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 7(1), pages 93-104, May.
    2. James E. Bailey & Sammy W. Pearson, 1983. "Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(5), pages 530-545, May.
    3. Samar El-Kasrawy & Sara El-Sebai, 2017. "Evaluating The Performance Of Some Global DistributionSystems And Its Impact On Airlines And Travel Agencies In Egypt," Tourism Research Institute, Journal of Tourism Research, vol. 17(1), pages 38-47, June.
    4. Lee, Hae Young & Lee, Yong-Ki & Kwon, Dowan, 2005. "The intention to use computerized reservation systems: the moderating effects of organizational support and supplier incentive," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(11), pages 1552-1561, November.
    5. Thomas C. Powell & Anne Dent‐Micallef, 1997. "Information technology as competitive advantage: the role of human, business, and technology resources," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(5), pages 375-405, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ku, Edward C.S., 2022. "Developing business process agility: Evidence from inter-organizational information systems of airlines and travel agencies," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    2. Jiang, Lijun & Wang, Xifu & Yang, Kai & Gao, Yiwen, 2023. "Bilevel optimization for the reorganization of inland river ports: A niche perspective," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Affifa Sardar & Amir Manzoor & Khurram Adeel Shaikh & Liaqat Ali, 2021. "An Empirical Examination of the Impact of eWom Information on Young Consumers’ Online Purchase Intention: Mediating Role of eWom Information Adoption," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    2. Bui Thi Minh Thu & Nguyen Thi Bich Thu, 2023. "The effect of the relationship between integrating information systems and total quality management on company organizational performance in Vietnam," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 13(2), pages 145-160.
    3. Sanduni I. Senaratne & Samantha M. Samarasinghe, 2019. "Factors Affecting the Intention to Adopt M-Learning," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(2), pages 150-164, February.
    4. Mahmoona Khalil & Kausar Fiaz Khawaja & Muddassar Sarfraz, 2022. "The adoption of blockchain technology in the financial sector during the era of fourth industrial revolution: a moderated mediated model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2435-2452, August.
    5. Zanakis, Stelios H. & Mandakovic, Tomislav & Gupta, Sushil K. & Sahay, Sundeep & Hong, Sungwan, 1995. "A review of program evaluation and fund allocation methods within the service and government sectors," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 59-79, March.
    6. Un-Kon Lee, 2017. "International Tourism Advertisements on Social Media: Impact of Argument Quality and Source," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-18, August.
    7. Gelderman, Maarten, 1997. "Task difficulty, task variability and satisfaction with management support systems: consequences and solutions ˜," Serie Research Memoranda 0053, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    8. Vikram Sethi & Ruth C. King, 1999. "Nonlinear and Noncompensatory Models in User Information Satisfaction Measurement," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 10(1), pages 87-96, March.
    9. Olivier Glassey, 2010. "eGovernment: Does IT save time?," Post-Print hal-00599187, HAL.
    10. Jong Uk Kim & Rajiv Kishore, 2019. "Do we Fully Understand Information Systems Failure? An Exploratory Study of the Cognitive Schema of IS Professionals," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 1385-1419, December.
    11. Ehiorobo Osa Abraham, 2020. "Assessing Financial Resource Capability on Insurance Claims Management in Nigeria: The Moderating Role of Information Technology," Studia Commercialia Bratislavensia, Sciendo, vol. 13(46), pages 279-291, December.
    12. Hunton, James E. & Gibson, Dana, 1999. "Soliciting user-input during the development of an accounting information system: investigating the efficacy of group discussion," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 24(7), pages 597-618, October.
    13. Pierre Berthon & Leyland Pitt & Michael Ewing & Christopher L. Carr, 2002. "Potential Research Space in MIS: A Framework for Envisioning and Evaluating Research Replication, Extension, and Generation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(4), pages 416-427, December.
    14. Verhagen, Tibert & Meents, Selmar, 2007. "A Framework for Developing Semantic Differentials in IS research: Assessing the Meaning of Electronic Marketplace Quality (EMQ)," Serie Research Memoranda 0016, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    15. Nurlia Dewi & Willy Abdillah & Muhartini Salim & Slamet Widodo, 2021. "The Role of Leadership in Implementation Public Information System of Local Government Institutions in Indonesia," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 11(6), pages 1-9.
    16. Stephanie Medlock & Juliette L Parlevliet & Danielle Sent & Saeid Eslami & Marjan Askari & Derk L Arts & Joost B Hoekstra & Sophia E de Rooij & Ameen Abu-Hanna, 2017. "An email-based intervention to improve the number and timeliness of letters sent from the hospital outpatient clinic to the general practitioner: A pair-randomized controlled trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-13, October.
    17. repec:jtr:journl:v:4:y:2012:i:1:p:12-37 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Bayrak, Tuncay, 2018. "Evaluating large-scale IT investment decisions," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 128-138.
    19. Garrison, Gary & Wakefield, Robin L. & Kim, Sanghyun, 2015. "The effects of IT capabilities and delivery model on cloud computing success and firm performance for cloud supported processes and operations," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 377-393.
    20. Sharath Sasidharan & Radhika Santhanam & Daniel J. Brass & Vallabh Sambamurthy, 2012. "The Effects of Social Network Structure on Enterprise Systems Success: A Longitudinal Multilevel Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(3-part-1), pages 658-678, September.
    21. Alain Asquin & Emmanuelle Reynaud & Marion Polgé, 2001. "Entrepreneurship: what are the typical capabilities to create competitive resources? A discussion from case studies," Post-Print hal-00379862, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:20:p:8425-:d:427165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.