Author
Listed:
- Gintaras Šiaudinis
(Vėžaičiai Branch of the Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Gargždų Str. 29, LT-96216 Vėžaičiai, Klaipėda Distr., Lithuania)
- Algirdas Jasinskas
(Agriculture Academy, Institute of Agricultural Engineering and Safety, Vytautas Magnus University, Studentų Str. 15A, LT-53362 Akademija, Kaunas Distr., Lithuania)
- Danutė Karčauskienė
(Vėžaičiai Branch of the Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Gargždų Str. 29, LT-96216 Vėžaičiai, Klaipėda Distr., Lithuania)
- Egidijus Šarauskis
(Agriculture Academy, Institute of Agricultural Engineering and Safety, Vytautas Magnus University, Studentų Str. 15A, LT-53362 Akademija, Kaunas Distr., Lithuania)
- Kristina Lekavičienė
(Agriculture Academy, Institute of Agricultural Engineering and Safety, Vytautas Magnus University, Studentų Str. 15A, LT-53362 Akademija, Kaunas Distr., Lithuania)
- Regina Repšienė
(Vėžaičiai Branch of the Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Gargždų Str. 29, LT-96216 Vėžaičiai, Klaipėda Distr., Lithuania)
Abstract
In order to evaluate the liming and nitrogen efficiency of cocksfoot ( Dactylisglomerata L.) productivity, a field experiment was performed in Western Lithuania’s naturally acidic Retisol area (55°43′ N, 21°27′ E). Based on seven years of research data, dry mass (DM) yield (including first and second cuttings) reliably varied depending on the growing year, from 4.57 to 7.34 t ha −1 . The most significant and positive impact on DM yield was obtained by the application of higher liming (6.0 t ha −1 CaCO 3 ) and nitrogen (120 kg ha −1 ) rates. Liming utilization efficiency (LUE) was affected by the year of growth (although not always significantly), with a 6.0 t ha −1 CaCO 3 liming rate and nitrogen fertilization. Nitrogen utilization efficiency (NUE) varied depending on the growing year and N fertilization rate. One of the most effective solutions for improving cocksfoot biomass is to prepare pressed granulated biofuel, which is potentially a good quality raw material for the direct combustion process. The execution and evaluation of technological parameters and properties of produced pellets revealed that cocksfoot pellet humidity reached 10.0% ± 0.6%, whereas pellet density was sufficiently high, and reached 983.8 ± 22.9 kgm −3 DM. The lower calorific value of cocksfoot pellets reached 17.7 MJkg −1 . Ash content after pellet burning was relatively high, reaching 7.0–7.6%. Pellet ash melting temperatures were sufficiently high, with ash softening temperature (ST) reaching 1065 °C. Determined emissions of harmful gases from the burning of cocksfoot pellets (CO 2 , CO, SO 2 , NO x and unburnt hydrocarbons C x H y ) did not exceed the permissible limits.
Suggested Citation
Gintaras Šiaudinis & Algirdas Jasinskas & Danutė Karčauskienė & Egidijus Šarauskis & Kristina Lekavičienė & Regina Repšienė, 2020.
"The Dependence of Cocksfoot Productivity of Liming and Nitrogen Application and the Assessment of Qualitative Parameters and Environmental Impact Using Biomass for Biofuels,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-13, October.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:8208-:d:423988
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Beata Kuziemska & Andrzej Wysokinski & Paulina Klej, 2023.
"The Content, Uptake and Bioaccumulation Factor of Copper and Nickel in Grass Depending on Zinc Application and Organic Fertilization,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, August.
- Beata Kuziemska & Paulina Klej & Andrzej Wysokinski & Robert Rudziński, 2022.
"Effect of Zinc along with Organic Fertilizers on Phosphorus Uptake and Use Efficiency by Cocksfoot ( Dactylis glomerata L.),"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-11, September.
- Jacek Sosnowski & Milena Truba & Katarzyna Jarecka, 2022.
"Effect of Humus, Compost, and Vermicompost Extracts on the Net Energy Concentration, Net Energy of Lactation, and Energy Yield of Dactylis glomerata and Lolium perenne,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-10, July.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:8208-:d:423988. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.