IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i19p7934-d419472.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrated Tomato Picking and Distribution Scheduling Based on Maturity

Author

Listed:
  • Anqi Zhu

    (School of Information Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210031, China)

  • Bei Bian

    (School of Information Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210031, China)

  • Yiping Jiang

    (School of Information Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210031, China)

  • Jiaxiang Hu

    (College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
    China Center for Food Security Studies, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China)

Abstract

Agriproducts have the characteristics of short lifespan and quality decay due to the maturity factor. With the development of e-commerce, high timelines and quality have become a new pursuit for agriproduct online retailing. To satisfy the new demands of customers, reducing the time from receiving orders to distribution and improving agriproduct quality are significantly needed advancements. In this study, we focus on the joint optimization of the fulfillment of online tomato orders that integrates picking and distribution simultaneously within the context of the farm-to-door model. A tomato maturity model with a firmness indicator is proposed firstly. Then, we incorporate the tomato maturity model function into the integrated picking and distribution schedule and formulate a multiple-vehicle routing problem with time windows. Next, to solve the model, an improved genetic algorithm (the sweep-adaptive genetic algorithm, S-AGA) is addressed. Finally, we prove the validity of the proposed model and the superiority of S-AGA with different numerical experiments. The results show that significant improvements are obtained in the overall tomato supply chain efficiency and quality. For instance, tomato quality and customer satisfaction increased by 5% when considering the joint optimization, and the order processing speed increased over 90% compared with traditional GA. This study could provide scientific tomato picking and distribution scheduling to satisfy the multiple requirements of consumers and improve agricultural and logistics sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Anqi Zhu & Bei Bian & Yiping Jiang & Jiaxiang Hu, 2020. "Integrated Tomato Picking and Distribution Scheduling Based on Maturity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:7934-:d:419472
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/7934/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/7934/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Behzadi, Golnar & O’Sullivan, Michael Justin & Olsen, Tava Lennon & Zhang, Abraham, 2018. "Agribusiness supply chain risk management: A review of quantitative decision models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 21-42.
    2. Liu, Hengyu & Zhang, Juliang & Zhou, Chen & Ru, Yihong, 2018. "Optimal purchase and inventory retrieval policies for perishable seasonal agricultural products," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 133-145.
    3. Ahumada, Omar & Rene Villalobos, J. & Nicholas Mason, A., 2012. "Tactical planning of the production and distribution of fresh agricultural products under uncertainty," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 17-26.
    4. Shiue, Yih-Chearng, 1990. "An inventory model for perishable items in a lot-size system with quantity discounts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 45(2-3), pages 260-264, April.
    5. Kangzhou Wang & Shulin Lan & Yingxue Zhao, 2017. "A genetic-algorithm-based approach to the two-echelon capacitated vehicle routing problem with stochastic demands in logistics service," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(11), pages 1409-1421, November.
    6. Ahumada, Omar & Villalobos, J. Rene, 2009. "Application of planning models in the agri-food supply chain: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(1), pages 1-20, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Linlu Zu & Mingzheng Han & Jiuqin Liu & Pingzeng Liu & Tianhua Li & Fei Su, 2022. "Design and Experiment of Nondestructive Post-Harvest Device for Tomatoes," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Yongmao Xiao & Jincheng Zhou & Xiaoyong Zhu & Fajun Yu, 2022. "Research on Optimization Method and Algorithm Design of Green Simultaneous Pick-up and Delivery Vehicle Scheduling under Uncertain Demand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhong, Yuanguang & Liu, Ju & Zhou, Yong-Wu & Cao, Bin & Zheng, Xueliang, 2023. "The Role of Ambiguity Aversion in Contract-farming Supply Chains: A Distributionally Robust Approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    2. Tuğçe Taşkıner & Bilge Bilgen, 2021. "Optimization Models for Harvest and Production Planning in Agri-Food Supply Chain: A Systematic Review," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-27, August.
    3. Najafi, Mehdi & Zolfagharinia, Hossein, 2024. "A Multi-objective integrated approach to address sustainability in a meat supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    4. Fatemeh Keshavarz-Ghorbani & Seyed Hamid Reza Pasandideh, 2022. "Modeling and optimizing an agro-supply chain considering different quality grades and storage systems for fresh products: a Benders decomposition solution approach," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 21-50, August.
    5. Soto-Silva, Wladimir E. & Nadal-Roig, Esteve & González-Araya, Marcela C. & Pla-Aragones, Lluis M., 2016. "Operational research models applied to the fresh fruit supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(2), pages 345-355.
    6. Na Luo & Tava Lennon Olsen & Yanping Liu, 2021. "A Conceptual Framework to Analyze Food Loss and Waste within Food Supply Chains: An Operations Management Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    7. Flores, Hector & Villalobos, J. Rene, 2018. "A modeling framework for the strategic design of local fresh-food systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1-15.
    8. Kusumastuti, Ratih Dyah & Donk, Dirk Pieter van & Teunter, Ruud, 2016. "Crop-related harvesting and processing planning: a review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 76-92.
    9. Jahantab, Mahboubeh & Abbasi, Babak & Le Bodic, Pierre, 2023. "Farmland allocation in the conversion from conventional to organic farming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(3), pages 1103-1119.
    10. Amorim, Pedro & Curcio, Eduardo & Almada-Lobo, Bernardo & Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana P.F.D. & Grossmann, Ignacio E., 2016. "Supplier selection in the processed food industry under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(3), pages 801-814.
    11. Jianli Luo & Chen Ji & Chunxiao Qiu & Fu Jia, 2018. "Agri-Food Supply Chain Management: Bibliometric and Content Analyses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-22, May.
    12. Chintapalli, Prashant & Tang, Christopher S., 2022. "The implications of crop minimum support price in the presence of myopic and strategic farmers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(1), pages 336-349.
    13. Yang, Manyi & Qu, Shaojian & Ji, Ying & Abdoulrahaman, Dabo, 2024. "Vulnerability of fresh agricultural products supply chain: Assessment, interrelationship analysis and control strategies," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    14. Liu, Qingyu & Shen, Bin & Wen, Xin, 2023. "Role of climate-smart agriculture in fighting against climate change in competitive supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    15. Kate, Joeri ten & Teunter, Ruud & Kusumastuti, Ratih Dyah & van Donk, Dirk Pieter, 2017. "Bio-diesel production using mobile processing units: A case in Indonesia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 121-130.
    16. Behzadi, Golnar & O’Sullivan, Michael Justin & Olsen, Tava Lennon & Zhang, Abraham, 2018. "Agribusiness supply chain risk management: A review of quantitative decision models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 21-42.
    17. Reis, Silvia Araújo & Leal, José Eugenio, 2015. "A deterministic mathematical model to support temporal and spatial decisions of the soybean supply chain," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 48-58.
    18. Borodin, Valeria & Bourtembourg, Jean & Hnaien, Faicel & Labadie, Nacima, 2016. "Handling uncertainty in agricultural supply chain management: A state of the art," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 348-359.
    19. El Mehdi, Er Raqabi & Ilyas, Himmich & Nizar, El Hachemi & Issmaïl, El Hallaoui & François, Soumis, 2023. "Incremental LNS framework for integrated production, inventory, and vessel scheduling: Application to a global supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    20. Yi Wang & Yafei Yang & Zhaoxiang Qin & Yefei Yang & Jun Li, 2023. "A Literature Review on the Application of Digital Technology in Achieving Green Supply Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:7934-:d:419472. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.