IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i18p7504-d412333.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of a Multi-Criteria Model for Sustainable Reorganization of a Healthcare System in an Emergency Situation Caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Dragan Pamučar

    (Informetrics Research Group, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 758307, Vietnam
    Faculty of Civil Engineering, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 758307, Vietnam)

  • Mališa Žižović

    (Faculty of Technical Sciences in Cacak, University of Kragujevac, Svetog Save 65, 32102 Cacak, Serbia)

  • Dragan Marinković

    (Berlin Institute of Technology, Department of Structural Analysis, 10115 Berlin, Germany)

  • Dragan Doljanica

    (MEF Faculty of Applied Management, Economics and Finance, University Business Academy in Novi Sad, Jevrejska 24, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Saša Virijević Jovanović

    (MEF Faculty of Applied Management, Economics and Finance, University Business Academy in Novi Sad, Jevrejska 24, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Pavle Brzaković

    (MEF Faculty of Applied Management, Economics and Finance, University Business Academy in Novi Sad, Jevrejska 24, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

Abstract

Healthcare systems worldwide are facing problems in providing health care to patients in a pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus (COVID-19). The pandemic causes an extreme disease to spread with fluctuating needs among patients, which significantly affect the capacity and overall performance of healthcare systems. In addition, its impact on the sustainability of the entire economic and social system is enormous and certain sustainable management strategies need to be selected. To meet the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic and ensure sustainable performance, national healthcare systems must adapt to new circumstances. This paper proposes an original multi-criteria methodology for the sustainable selection of strategic guidelines for the reorganization of a healthcare system under the conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic. The selection of an appropriate strategic guideline is made on the basis of defined criteria and depending on infection capacity and pandemic spread risk. The criteria for the evaluation of strategic guidelines were defined on the basis of a survey in which the medical personnel engaged in the crisis response team during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Republic of Serbia participated. The Level-Based Weight Assessment (LBWA) model and Measuring Attractiveness by a Categorical-Based Evaluation Technique (MACBETH) method were used to determine the weight coefficient criteria, while a novel fuzzy Ranking of Alternatives through Functional Mapping of Criterion Subintervals into a Single Interval (RAFSI) model was used to evaluate the strategic guidelines. The proposed multi-criteria methodology was tested in a case study in the Republic of Serbia. The validity of the proposed methodology is shown through the simulation of changes in input parameters of Bonferroni aggregation functions and through a comparison with other multi-criteria methodologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Dragan Pamučar & Mališa Žižović & Dragan Marinković & Dragan Doljanica & Saša Virijević Jovanović & Pavle Brzaković, 2020. "Development of a Multi-Criteria Model for Sustainable Reorganization of a Healthcare System in an Emergency Situation Caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-25, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7504-:d:412333
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7504/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7504/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zavadskas, E. K. & Kaklauskas, A. & Banaitis, A. & Kvederyte, N., 2004. "Housing credit access model: The case for Lithuania," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(2), pages 335-352, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez & Eduardo Navarro-Jiménez & Pablo Ruisoto & Athanasios A. Dalamitros & Ana Isabel Beltran-Velasco & Alberto Hormeño-Holgado & Carmen Cecilia Laborde-Cárdenas & Jose Fran, 2021. "Performance of Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis of Emergency System in COVID-19 Pandemic. An Extensive Narrative Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-12, May.
    2. Sibnath Deb & Samarjit Kar & Shayana Deb & Sanjib Biswas & Aehsan Ahmad Dar & Tusharika Mukherjee, 2022. "A Cross-Sectional Study on Mental Health of School Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic in India," Data, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-27, July.
    3. Wang, Weizhong & Chen, Yu & Wang, Yi & Deveci, Muhammet & Moslem, Sarbast & Coffman, D'Maris, 2024. "Unveiling the implementation barriers to the digital transformation in the energy sector using the Fermatean cubic fuzzy method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
    4. Justyna Berniak-Woźny & Małgorzata Rataj, 2023. "Towards Green and Sustainable Healthcare: A Literature Review and Research Agenda for Green Leadership in the Healthcare Sector," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-18, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mulliner, Emma & Smallbone, Kieran & Maliene, Vida, 2013. "An assessment of sustainable housing affordability using a multiple criteria decision making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 270-279.
    2. Fernando A. F. Ferreira & Ieva Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė & Edmundas K. Zavadskas & Marjan S. Jalali & Sandra M. J. Catarino, 2019. "A Judgment-Based Risk Assessment Framework for Consumer Loans," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(01), pages 7-33, January.
    3. Mulliner, Emma & Malys, Naglis & Maliene, Vida, 2016. "Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB), pages 146-156.
    4. Maghsoud Amiri & Mohammad Hashemi-Tabatabaei & Mohammad Ghahremanloo & Mehdi Keshavarz-Ghorabaee & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Arturas Kaklauskas, 2021. "Evaluating Life Cycle of Buildings Using an Integrated Approach Based on Quantitative-Qualitative and Simplified Best-Worst Methods (QQM-SBWM)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-28, April.
    5. Hannan Amoozad Mahdiraji & Sepas Arzaghi & Gintaras Stauskis & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, 2018. "A Hybrid Fuzzy BWM-COPRAS Method for Analyzing Key Factors of Sustainable Architecture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-26, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7504-:d:412333. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.