IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i17p7088-d406418.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Smart Cities Oriented Project Planning and Evaluation Methodology Driven by Citizen Perception—IoT Smart Mobility Case

Author

Listed:
  • Luis F. Luque-Vega

    (Centro de Investigación, Innovación y Desarrollo Tecnológico CIIDETEC-UVM, Universidad del Valle de Mexico, Tlaquepaque, Jalisco 45601, Mexico)

  • Miriam A. Carlos-Mancilla

    (Centro de Investigación, Innovación y Desarrollo Tecnológico CIIDETEC-UVM, Universidad del Valle de Mexico, Tlaquepaque, Jalisco 45601, Mexico)

  • Verónica G. Payán-Quiñónez

    (Centro de Investigación, Innovación y Desarrollo Tecnológico CIIDETEC-UVM, Universidad del Valle de Mexico, Tlaquepaque, Jalisco 45601, Mexico)

  • Emmanuel Lopez-Neri

    (Centro de Investigación, Innovación y Desarrollo Tecnológico CIIDETEC-UVM, Universidad del Valle de Mexico, Tlaquepaque, Jalisco 45601, Mexico)

Abstract

Smart Cities empower progress through technology integration directed with a strategic approach to sustainable development and citizen well-being. The creation of solid strategic planning boosts the development of infrastructure, innovation, and technology. However, the above can be compromised if citizens are not properly involved; therefore, it is relevant to enhance citizen participation when a new Smart City project appears on the horizon. This work presents a Smart Cities Oriented Project Planning and Evaluation (SCOPPE) Methodology that combines the citizen participation and the Minimum Viable Product creation through adaptive project management. Moreover, since the smart mobility projects represent the first step towards a Smart City, a case of study of an Intelligent Parking System (SEI-UVM) is presented following the SCOPPE Methodology. The application’s steps results lead us to key and useful information when defining, designing, and implementing the minimum viable product of the cornerstone device of the SEI-UVM: the Smart Vehicle Presence Sensor (SPIN-V). It is worthwhile to mention that the proposed SCOPPE Methodology could be extended to any Smart City project.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis F. Luque-Vega & Miriam A. Carlos-Mancilla & Verónica G. Payán-Quiñónez & Emmanuel Lopez-Neri, 2020. "Smart Cities Oriented Project Planning and Evaluation Methodology Driven by Citizen Perception—IoT Smart Mobility Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-18, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:7088-:d:406418
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/7088/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/7088/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Patricia Janoskova & Katarina Repkova Stofkova & Martina Kovacikova & Jana Stofkova & Kristina Kovacikova, 2021. "The Concept of a Smart City Communication in the Form of an Urban Mobile Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Rodríguez Bolívar, Manuel Pedro & Alcaide Muñoz, Laura & Alcaide Muñoz, Cristina, 2023. "Identifying patterns in smart initiatives' planning in smart cities. An empirical analysis in Spanish smart cities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    3. Carlos J. Rodríguez-Rad & María-Ángeles Revilla-Camacho & María-Elena Sánchez-del-Río-Vázquez, 2023. "Exploring the Intention to Adopt Sustainable Mobility Modes of Transport among Young University Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Danila Parygin & Natalia Sadovnikova & Leyla Gamidullaeva & Anton Finogeev & Nikolay Rashevskiy, 2022. "Tools and Technologies for Sustainable Territorial Development in the Context of a Quadruple Innovation Helix," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    5. Monika Wawer & Kalina Grzesiuk & Dorota Jegorow, 2022. "Smart Mobility in a Smart City in the Context of Generation Z Sustainability, Use of ICT, and Participation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-30, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:7088-:d:406418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.