IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i17p6752-d401582.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inter-Relations among Motivation, Self-Perceived Use of Strategies and Academic Achievement in Science: A Study with Spanish Secondary School Students

Author

Listed:
  • Enric Ortega-Torres

    (Science Education, Florida Universitaria, 46470 Valencia, Spain
    Science Education and CDC Research Group, Universitat de Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

  • Joan-Josep Solaz-Portoles

    (Science Education and CDC Research Group, Universitat de Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

  • Vicente Sanjosé-López

    (Science Education and CDC Research Group, Universitat de Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

Abstract

The relationship between motivation and the use of learning strategies is a focus of research in order to improve students’ learning. Meaningful learning requires a learner’s personal commitment to put forth the required effort needed to acquire new knowledge. This commitment involves emotional as well as cognitive and metacognitive factors, and requires the ability to manage different resources at hand, in order to achieve the proposed learning goals. The main objectives in the present study were to analyse: (a) Spanish secondary school students’ motivation and self-perception of using strategies when learning science; (b) the nature of the relationship between motivation and perceived use of learning strategies; (c) the influence of different motivational, cognitive, metacognitive and management strategies on students’ science achievement. The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) was administered to 364 middle and high-school students in grades 7–11. For each participant, the academic achievement was provided by the respective science teacher. The results obtained from the Pearson product-moment correlations between the study variables and a stepwise regression analysis suggested that: (1) motivation, cognitive and metacognitive, and resource management strategies, have a significant influence on students’ science achievement; (2) students’ motivation acts as a kind of enabling factor for the intellectual effort, which is assessed by the self-perceived use of learning strategies in science; and, (3) motivational components have a greater impact on students’ performance in science than cognitive and metacognitive strategies, with self-efficacy being the variable with the strongest influence. These results suggest a reflexion about the limited impact on science achievement of the self-perceived use of cognitive and metacognitive strategies, and highlight the importance of students’ self-efficacy in science, in line with previous studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Enric Ortega-Torres & Joan-Josep Solaz-Portoles & Vicente Sanjosé-López, 2020. "Inter-Relations among Motivation, Self-Perceived Use of Strategies and Academic Achievement in Science: A Study with Spanish Secondary School Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-12, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:6752-:d:401582
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/6752/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/6752/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rubén Trigueros & Ana Padilla & José M. Aguilar-Parra & María J. Lirola & Amelia V. García-Luengo & Patricia Rocamora-Pérez & Remedios López-Liria, 2020. "The Influence of Teachers on Motivation and Academic Stress and Their Effect on the Learning Strategies of University Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-11, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:6752-:d:401582. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.