Perceptions and Preconceptions about Chicken and Pork Meat: A Qualitative Exploratory Study of Argentine Consumers in the Metropolitan Area of Buenos Aires
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Lacaze, María Victoria, 2009. "Consumos alimentarios sustentables en Argentina: una estimación de la disposición a pagar por alimentos orgánicos frescos y procesados por consumidores de la ciudad de Buenos Aires," Nülan. Deposited Documents 380, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Centro de Documentación.
- Gallopín, Gilberto C. & Manuel-Navarrete, David, 2007. "Integración de políticas, sostenibilidad y agriculturización en la pampa argentina y áreas extrapampeanas," Seminarios y Conferencias 6896, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Adrián Bifaretti & Enrique Pavan & Gabriela Grigioni, 2023. "Consumer Attitudes and Concerns about Beef Consumption in Argentina and Other South American Countries," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, February.
- Andrea Beatriz Damico & Margherita Masi & José María Aulicino & Yari Vecchio & Jorgelina Di Pasquale, 2022. "The Knowledge and Perception of Sustainability in Livestock Systems: Evidence from Future Professionals in Italy and Argentina," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, December.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Farreras, Verónica & Riera, Pere & Salvador, Pablo F., 2017. "Environmental Valuation With Periodical Payments in High-inflation Economies. An Argentinean Case Study," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 56-63.
More about this item
Keywords
consumer preferences; consumer perception; consumer preconception; Argentine consumers; pork consumption; chicken consumption; meat consumption; environment impact; discourse analysis; qualitative data analysis;All these keywords.
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:6729-:d:401201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.