IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i15p5948-d388745.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unconventional Methods of Preserving Meat Products and Their Impact on Health and the Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Mariusz Rudy

    (Department of Agricultural Processing and Commodity Science, Institute of Food and Nutrition Technology, College of Natural Sciences, University of Rzeszow, St. Zelwerowicza Street 4, 35-601 Rzeszów, Poland)

  • Sylwia Kucharyk

    (Department of Agricultural Processing and Commodity Science, Institute of Food and Nutrition Technology, College of Natural Sciences, University of Rzeszow, St. Zelwerowicza Street 4, 35-601 Rzeszów, Poland)

  • Paulina Duma-Kocan

    (Department of Agricultural Processing and Commodity Science, Institute of Food and Nutrition Technology, College of Natural Sciences, University of Rzeszow, St. Zelwerowicza Street 4, 35-601 Rzeszów, Poland)

  • Renata Stanisławczyk

    (Department of Agricultural Processing and Commodity Science, Institute of Food and Nutrition Technology, College of Natural Sciences, University of Rzeszow, St. Zelwerowicza Street 4, 35-601 Rzeszów, Poland)

  • Marian Gil

    (Department of Agricultural Processing and Commodity Science, Institute of Food and Nutrition Technology, College of Natural Sciences, University of Rzeszow, St. Zelwerowicza Street 4, 35-601 Rzeszów, Poland)

Abstract

A dual objective of food storage is to retain nutritional value and safe consumption over time. As supply chains have globalized, food protection and preservation methods have advanced. However, increasing demands to cater for larger volumes and for more effective food storage call for new technologies. This paper examines promising meat preservation methods, including high pressure process, ultrasounds, pulsating electric and magnetic field, pulsed light and cold plasma. These methods not only make it possible to obtain meat and meat products with a longer shelf life, safer for health and without preservatives, but also are more environment-friendly in comparison with traditional methods. With the use of alternative methods, it is possible to obtain meat products that are microbiologically safer, whilst also high quality and free from chemical additives. Moreover, these new technologies are also more ecological, do not require large quantities of energy or water, and generate less waste.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariusz Rudy & Sylwia Kucharyk & Paulina Duma-Kocan & Renata Stanisławczyk & Marian Gil, 2020. "Unconventional Methods of Preserving Meat Products and Their Impact on Health and the Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-20, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:15:p:5948-:d:388745
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/15/5948/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/15/5948/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sakowska, Anna & Konarska, Małgorzata & Guzek, Dominika & Głąbska, Dominika & Wierzbicka, Agnieszka, 2014. "Charakterystyka wybranych systemów pakowania mięsa w odniesieniu do preferencji konsumentów i aspektów ekonomicznych," Problems of World Agriculture / Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, vol. 14(29), pages 1-11, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hugo Miguel Lisboa & Matheus Bittencourt Pasquali & Antonia Isabelly dos Anjos & Ana Maria Sarinho & Eloi Duarte de Melo & Rogério Andrade & Leonardo Batista & Janaina Lima & Yasmin Diniz & Amanda Bar, 2024. "Innovative and Sustainable Food Preservation Techniques: Enhancing Food Quality, Safety, and Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-44, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:15:p:5948-:d:388745. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.