IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i12p4977-d373243.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hazard-Consistent Earthquake Scenario Selection for Seismic Slope Stability Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Alexey Konovalov

    (Sakhalin Department of Far East Geological Institute, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk 693023, Russia)

  • Yuriy Gensiorovskiy

    (Sakhalin Department of Far East Geological Institute, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk 693023, Russia)

  • Andrey Stepnov

    (Sakhalin Department of Far East Geological Institute, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk 693023, Russia)

Abstract

Design ground shaking intensity, based on probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) maps, is most commonly used as a triggering condition to analyze slope stability under seismic loading. Uncertainties that are associated with expected ground motion levels are often ignored. This study considers an improved, fully probabilistic approach for earthquake scenario selection. The given method suggests the determination of the occurrence probability of various ground motion levels and the probability of landsliding for these ground motion parameters, giving the total probability of slope failure under seismic loading in a certain time interval. The occurrence hazard deaggregation technique is proposed for the selection of the ground shaking level, as well as the magnitude and source-to-site distance of a design earthquake, as these factors most probably trigger slope failure within the time interval of interest. An example application of the approach is provided for a slope near the highway in the south of Sakhalin Island (Russia). The total probability of earthquake-induced slope failure in the next 50 years was computed to be in the order of 16%. The scenario peak ground acceleration value estimated from the disaggregated earthquake-induced landslide hazard is 0.15 g , while the 475-year seismic hazard curve predicts 0.3 g . The case study highlights the significant difference between ground shaking scenario levels in terms of the 475-year seismic hazard map and the considered fully probabilistic approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexey Konovalov & Yuriy Gensiorovskiy & Andrey Stepnov, 2020. "Hazard-Consistent Earthquake Scenario Selection for Seismic Slope Stability Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-14, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:12:p:4977-:d:373243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/12/4977/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/12/4977/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrea Fabbri & Chang-Jo Chung & Antonio Cendrero & Juan Remondo, 2003. "Is Prediction of Future Landslides Possible with a GIS?," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 30(3), pages 487-503, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nussaïbah B. Raja & Ihsan Çiçek & Necla Türkoğlu & Olgu Aydin & Akiyuki Kawasaki, 2017. "Landslide susceptibility mapping of the Sera River Basin using logistic regression model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 85(3), pages 1323-1346, February.
    2. Caruso, Germán Daniel, 2017. "The legacy of natural disasters: The intergenerational impact of 100 years of disasters in Latin America," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 209-233.
    3. Yang Hong & Robert Adler & George Huffman, 2007. "Use of satellite remote sensing data in the mapping of global landslide susceptibility," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 43(2), pages 245-256, November.
    4. Juan Cao & Zhao Zhang & Jie Du & Liangliang Zhang & Yun Song & Geng Sun, 2020. "Multi-geohazards susceptibility mapping based on machine learning—a case study in Jiuzhaigou, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 102(3), pages 851-871, July.
    5. Bipin Peethambaran & R. Anbalagan & K. V. Shihabudheen, 2019. "Landslide susceptibility mapping in and around Mussoorie Township using fuzzy set procedure, MamLand and improved fuzzy expert system-A comparative study," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 96(1), pages 121-147, March.
    6. Dimitrios Myronidis & Charalambos Papageorgiou & Stavros Theophanous, 2016. "Landslide susceptibility mapping based on landslide history and analytic hierarchy process (AHP)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 81(1), pages 245-263, March.
    7. Dimitris Kouhartsiouk & Skevi Perdikou, 2021. "The application of DInSAR and Bayesian statistics for the assessment of landslide susceptibility," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(3), pages 2957-2985, February.
    8. Dimitrios Myronidis & Charalambos Papageorgiou & Stavros Theophanous, 2016. "Landslide susceptibility mapping based on landslide history and analytic hierarchy process (AHP)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 81(1), pages 245-263, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:12:p:4977-:d:373243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.