IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2019i1p301-d303417.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing a Landscape Sustainability Assessment Model Using an Analytic Hierarchy Process in Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Hyung-Sook Lee

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41561, Korea)

  • Eun-Yeong Park

    (Department of Environmental Landscape Architecture, Joongbu University, Geumsan 32713, Korea)

Abstract

With the increasing interest in integrative sustainable development, there has been a strong need for a landscape sustainability assessment tool independent from the existing green building rating system. This study aimed to establish an assessment model to objectively evaluate landscape sustainability using an analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Through an extensive literature review and expert survey, an initial list of assessment items was derived and used to set up an AHP model. An AHP survey with landscape architects and architects/engineers was then conducted to determine the importance of the assessment factors. In addition, the model was applied to three projects that were previously certified by a green building rating system in Korea. The AHP results showed that “site context” ranked as the most important factor of landscape sustainability followed by “soil and vegetation,” “maintenance,” “water,” “health and wellbeing,” and “materials.” Among the 20 assessment factors, “monitoring plan” was evaluated as the most important index, followed by “protection of cultural heritage” and “long-term management plan.” Landscape architects evaluated “soil and vegetation” as the most important in the assessment, while the engineers/architects group rated “site context” as the most important. When tested by applying them to the previously certified projects, the developed factors provided more objective and detailed information on landscape sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Hyung-Sook Lee & Eun-Yeong Park, 2019. "Developing a Landscape Sustainability Assessment Model Using an Analytic Hierarchy Process in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:301-:d:303417
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/1/301/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/1/301/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:301-:d:303417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.