IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i4p1057-d206835.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Circular Economy Practices on Wood Panels: A Bibliographic Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Cristiane Karyn de Carvalho Araújo

    (Department of Production Engineering and Sustainable Production Systems Laboratory (LESP), Federal University of Technology, Ponta Grossa 84016-210, Brazil)

  • Rodrigo Salvador

    (Department of Production Engineering and Sustainable Production Systems Laboratory (LESP), Federal University of Technology, Ponta Grossa 84016-210, Brazil)

  • Cassiano Moro Piekarski

    (Department of Production Engineering and Sustainable Production Systems Laboratory (LESP), Federal University of Technology, Ponta Grossa 84016-210, Brazil)

  • Carla Cristiane Sokulski

    (Department of Production Engineering and Sustainable Production Systems Laboratory (LESP), Federal University of Technology, Ponta Grossa 84016-210, Brazil)

  • Antonio Carlos de Francisco

    (Department of Production Engineering and Sustainable Production Systems Laboratory (LESP), Federal University of Technology, Ponta Grossa 84016-210, Brazil)

  • Sâmique Kyene de Carvalho Araújo Camargo

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Guaratinguetá 01049-010, Brazil)

Abstract

The scarcity of natural resources and the generation of waste without adequate disposal are a worldwide concern related to the linear production model.These characteristics are present in the wood panel production. Faced with this problem, the present study aimed to identify in the literature, circular economy (CE) practices in the waste management of wood panel production processes and the possibilities for implementing new practices that incorporate circularity concepts. A systematic search was conducted to select the most relevant work on the theme. A search was done using the ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Scopus databases by combining the following keywords: “Circular Economy” (and its possible variations), “Wood-based Panel”, and “Wood Waste”. The results evidenced circular economy practices on waste management already being used by the wood panel industry, besides potential practices to increase circularity. The changes go towards sustainable manufacturing and responsible consumption, which aims to “ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns”. Opportunities range from the extraction of raw materials to the disposal of wood panel waste at the end-of-life. The circular economy model is still recent and the process of transitioning is in its initial phase, as well as scientific research on the theme, mainly regarding the wood panel industry. Studies addressing the circular economy and wood panels are not yet widespread, pointing to a gap yet to be explored. The bibliographic review allowed identifying the existence of potential applications of circular economy in the wood panel industry; yet, this piece of research points to a broad field of exploration.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristiane Karyn de Carvalho Araújo & Rodrigo Salvador & Cassiano Moro Piekarski & Carla Cristiane Sokulski & Antonio Carlos de Francisco & Sâmique Kyene de Carvalho Araújo Camargo, 2019. "Circular Economy Practices on Wood Panels: A Bibliographic Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:4:p:1057-:d:206835
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/4/1057/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/4/1057/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marcia C. Branciforti & Alessandra L. Marinelli & Marcio Kobayashi & Jose D. Ambrosio & Marcos R. Monteiro & Antonio D. Nobre, 2009. "Wood Polymer Composites Technology Supporting the Recovery and Protection of Tropical Forests: The Amazonian Phoenix Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 1(4), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Fei Lun & Moucheng Liu & Dan Zhang & Wenhua Li & Junguo Liu, 2016. "Life Cycle Analysis of Carbon Flow and Carbon Footprint of Harvested Wood Products of Larix principis-rupprechtii in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Anna Augustsson & Louise Sörme & Anna Karlsson & Jennie Amneklev, 2017. "Persistent Hazardous Waste and the Quest Toward a Circular Economy: The Example of Arsenic in Chromated Copper Arsenate–Treated Wood," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(3), pages 689-699, June.
    4. Frank S. Luisser & Marc A. Rosen, 2009. "Improving the Sustainability of Office Partition Manufacturing: Balancing Options for Reducing Emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 1(2), pages 1-20, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luis Diaz‐Balteiro & Carlos Romero & Silvestre García de Jalón, 2022. "An analysis of the degree of circularity of the wood products industry in Europe," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1350-1363, August.
    2. Marika Arena & Giovanni Azzone & Manuela Grecchi & Giulia Piantoni, 2021. "How can the waste management sector contribute to overcoming barriers to the circular economy?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(6), pages 1062-1071, November.
    3. Israt Jahan & Guomin Zhang & Muhammed Bhuiyan & Satheeskumar Navaratnam, 2022. "Circular Economy of Construction and Demolition Wood Waste—A Theoretical Framework Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-26, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marc A. Rosen, 2012. "Engineering Sustainability: A Technical Approach to Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(9), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Mengwan Zhang & Ning Ma & Youneng Yang, 2023. "Carbon Footprint Assessment and Efficiency Measurement of Wood Processing Industry Based on Life Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-24, April.
    3. Marc A. Rosen & Hossam A. Kishawy, 2012. "Sustainable Manufacturing and Design: Concepts, Practices and Needs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-21, January.
    4. Shanshan Wang & Weifeng Wang & Hongqiang Yang, 2018. "Comparison of Product Carbon Footprint Protocols: Case Study on Medium-Density Fiberboard in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-14, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:4:p:1057-:d:206835. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.