IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i22p6522-d288639.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing Rice Production by Potassium Management: Recommended Reasonable Fertilization Strategies in Different Inherent Soil Productivity Levels for a Sustainable Rice Production System

Author

Listed:
  • Wenting Jiang

    (College of Life Science, Yan’an University, Yan’an, Shaanxi 716000, China)

  • Xiukang Wang

    (College of Life Science, Yan’an University, Yan’an, Shaanxi 716000, China)

  • Yingying Xing

    (College of Life Science, Yan’an University, Yan’an, Shaanxi 716000, China)

  • Xiaohu Liu

    (College of Land and Environmental, Shenyang Agriculture University, Shenyang 110866, China)

  • Zhigang Cui

    (College of Land and Environmental, Shenyang Agriculture University, Shenyang 110866, China)

  • Lihui Yang

    (College of Land and Environmental, Shenyang Agriculture University, Shenyang 110866, China)

Abstract

Enhancing agricultural productivity with the minimum possible cost to the environment is crucial for sustainable agriculture development. The effective management of K fertilizer would reduce the pollution risk of fertilizer residue. The data from the 29 experimental sites for rice in Liaoning province were used to determine the effect of different K fertilizer management in increasing yield, K uptake, and potassium fertilizer contribution rates (FCR K ) for rice. The relationship among rice yield, biomass accumulation and plant K uptake, and recommended reasonable K fertilizer application rates in different inherent soil productivity levels were evaluated. The four treatments comprised no K fertilizer (K0), K fertilizer application of 60 kg ha −1 (K60), 120 kg ha −1 (K120), and 180 kg ha −1 (K180). The K120 treatment showed a significant yield increase (16.59%) compared to the K0 treatment in this study. The average K uptake of grain in the K60, K120 and K180 treatments was 23.1, 24.8 and 24.9 kg ha −1 , which was significantly higher by 12.67%, 20.77%, and 21.48% compared to the K0 treatment. The average K uptake of grain, straw and plant was highest in K180 (134.8 kg ha −1 ), followed by the K120 and K60. Additionally, the correlation between grain yield, biomass accumulation (y) and plant K uptake (x) showed a significant positive polynomial function. The equation was y = −0.406x 2 + 110.43x + 639.3 and y = −0.237x 2 + 135.3x + 3796.2, respectively. The FCR K followed the sequence as K180 < K60 < K120. Furthermore, the recommended K application rates in the 29 experimental sites were ranged from 92.8 to 134.5 kg ha −1 , and the corresponding theoretical yield of recommended K rate were ranged from 7371.5 to 11144.5, and with an average of 9297.5 kg ha −1 . Remarkably, the average recommended K rate in the four inherent soil productivity levels was 116.1, 111.2, 112.2 and 111.7 kg ha −1 and the corresponding average theoretical yield was 9966.1 kg ha −1 , 10158.8 kg ha −1 , 8373.2 kg ha −1 and 8881.9 kg ha −1 . The results of this study suggest that different inherent soil productivity levels have different K application rates and yield performance. This result somewhat strengthens the finding of this study that moderate K application is conducive to effectively improving the yield and to the enhancement of agricultural productivity, which is conducive to the sustainable environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenting Jiang & Xiukang Wang & Yingying Xing & Xiaohu Liu & Zhigang Cui & Lihui Yang, 2019. "Enhancing Rice Production by Potassium Management: Recommended Reasonable Fertilization Strategies in Different Inherent Soil Productivity Levels for a Sustainable Rice Production System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-13, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:22:p:6522-:d:288639
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/22/6522/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/22/6522/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wenting Jiang & Xiaohu Liu & Ying Wang & Yu Zhang & Wen Qi, 2018. "Responses to Potassium Application and Economic Optimum K Rate of Maize under Different Soil Indigenous K Supply," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-10, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lian-Jie Wan & Yang Tian & Man He & Yong-Qiang Zheng & Qiang Lyu & Rang-Jin Xie & Yan-Yan Ma & Lie Deng & Shi-Lai Yi, 2021. "Effects of Chemical Fertilizer Combined with Organic Fertilizer Application on Soil Properties, Citrus Growth Physiology, and Yield," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Yingying Xing & Xiaoli Niu & Ning Wang & Wenting Jiang & Yaguang Gao & Xiukang Wang, 2020. "The Correlation between Soil Nutrient and Potato Quality in Loess Plateau of China Based on PLSR," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asad Mohd Fathi Amin AlKhader & Amal Al-Khatib & Awad Kaabneh & Ali Mahasneh & Elaf Obeidat & Yahya Bani Khalaf & Ahmad Bataineh & Isra Salem & Shahnaz Absharat, 2023. "Response of Wheat Crop to Potassium Fertilization Under Rain-fed Conditions in Semi-arid Regions," Sustainable Agriculture Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(1), pages 1-51, April.
    2. Limin Chuan & Huaiguo Zheng & Sufen Sun & Ailing Wang & Jipei Liu & Tongke Zhao & Jingjuan Zhao, 2019. "A Sustainable Way of Fertilizer Recommendation Based on Yield Response and Agronomic Efficiency for Chinese Cabbage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Wenting Jiang & Yingying Xing & Xiukang Wang & Xiaohu Liu & Zhigang Cui, 2020. "Developing a Sustainable Management Strategy for Quantitative Estimation of Optimum Nitrogen Fertilizer Recommendation Rates for Maize in Northeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-12, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:22:p:6522-:d:288639. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.