IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i22p6519-d288583.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Ecosystem Service Values of Urban Parks in Improving Air Quality: A Case Study of Wuhan, China

Author

Listed:
  • Qijiao Xie

    (School of Resources and Environmental Science, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China
    Key Laboratory of Regional Development and Environmental Response, Wuhan 430062, China)

  • Yang Yue

    (School of Resources and Environmental Science, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China)

  • Qi Sun

    (School of Resources and Environmental Science, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China)

  • Si Chen

    (School of Resources and Environmental Science, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China
    Key Laboratory of Regional Development and Environmental Response, Wuhan 430062, China)

  • Soo-Beom Lee

    (Department of Transportation Engineering, University of Seoul, Seoul 04763, Korea)

  • Seong Wook Kim

    (Department of Applied Mathematics, Hanyang University, Ansan 15588, Korea)

Abstract

Assessing ecosystem service values of urban parks can promote understanding of urban green space protection and management. In this study, ecosystem services of air quality purification from 40 sample parks with different areas and land cover compositions were assessed based on literature records and high-resolution images. Six typical ecological benefits of CO 2 sequestration, O 2 generation, air temperature amelioration, SO 2 removal, NO x removal, and dust interception were estimated. The results showed similar proportions of different ecosystem service values to total. The ecological services of CO 2 sequestration and O 2 generation contributed the majority of total ecosystem service value, with percentages ranging from 69.34% to 73.76% and from 20.52% to 21.71%, respectively. There was very wide variation of ecosystem service values among urban parks. Multivariate regression between ecosystem service values and spatial characteristics of urban parks revealed that park areas of forest and water played a vital role in service value. For a given park, the total service value could be increased by up to 600% if the park was redesigned with consideration of land cover composition. This study provides sound scientific information for urban planners and greening designers to optimize urban park layout.

Suggested Citation

  • Qijiao Xie & Yang Yue & Qi Sun & Si Chen & Soo-Beom Lee & Seong Wook Kim, 2019. "Assessment of Ecosystem Service Values of Urban Parks in Improving Air Quality: A Case Study of Wuhan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-14, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:22:p:6519-:d:288583
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/22/6519/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/22/6519/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zeng, Jingjing & Liu, Ting & Feiock, Richard & Li, Fei, 2019. "The impacts of China's provincial energy policies on major air pollutants: A spatial econometric analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 392-403.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wei Jiang & Bojie Fu & Yihe Lü, 2020. "Assessing Impacts of Land Use/Land Cover Conversion on Changes in Ecosystem Services Value on the Loess Plateau, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-26, September.
    2. Antonella Pietta & Marco Tononi, 2021. "Re-Naturing the City: Linking Urban Political Ecology and Cultural Ecosystem Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Chunsheng Wu & Guoxia Ma & Weishan Yang & Ying Zhou & Fei Peng & Jinnan Wang & Fang Yu, 2021. "Assessment of Ecosystem Service Value and Its Differences in the Yellow River Basin and Yangtze River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Wen Wu & Kewei Ding, 2022. "Optimization Strategy for Parks and Green Spaces in Shenyang City: Improving the Supply Quality and Accessibility," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-13, April.
    5. Diana Andreea Onose & Ioan Cristian Iojă & Mihai Răzvan Niță & Gabriel Ovidiu Vânău & Ana Maria Popa, 2020. "Too Old for Recreation? How Friendly Are Urban Parks for Elderly People?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-14, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Wang, Fuhao & Chang, Yu-Fang, 2023. "Towards net-zero emissions: Can green bond policy promote green innovation and green space?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    2. Li-chen Zhang & Zheng-ai Dong & Zhi-xiong Tan & Jia-hui Luo & De-kui Yan, 2024. "Institutional Performance and Carbon Reduction Effect of High-Quality Development of New Energy: China’s Experience and Policy Implication," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-26, August.
    3. Pinglin He & Jing Ning & Zhongfu Yu & Hao Xiong & Huayu Shen & Hui Jin, 2019. "Can Environmental Tax Policy Really Help to Reduce Pollutant Emissions? An Empirical Study of a Panel ARDL Model Based on OECD Countries and China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-32, August.
    4. Mengyao Liu & Hongli Jiang, 2022. "Can the Energy-Consumption Permit Trading Scheme Curb SO 2 Emissions? Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Chao Bi & Jingjing Zeng, 2019. "Nonlinear and Spatial Effects of Tourism on Carbon Emissions in China: A Spatial Econometric Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Ke-Liang Wang & Rui-Rui Zhu & Yun-He Cheng, 2022. "Does the Development of Digital Finance Contribute to Haze Pollution Control? Evidence from China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, April.
    7. Xiaoyan Sun & Wenwei Lian & Hongmei Duan & Anjian Wang, 2021. "Factors Affecting Wind Power Efficiency: Evidence from Provincial-Level Data in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Jingjing Zeng & Dingjie Liu & Hongtao Yi, 2019. "Agglomeration, Structural Embeddedness, and Enterprises’ Innovation Performance: An Empirical Study of Wuhan Biopharmaceutical Industrial Cluster Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-15, July.
    9. Zeng, Jingjing & Bao, Rui & McFarland, Michael, 2022. "Clean energy substitution: The effect of transitioning from coal to gas on air pollution," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    10. Wu, Jian-Xin & He, Ling-Yun & Zhang, ZhongXiang, 2022. "On the co-evolution of PM2.5 concentrations and income in China: A joint distribution dynamics approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    11. Sichong Chen & Wenxue Li & Qi Wang, 2020. "Are Chinese Acquirers Discriminated against in Cross‐border Mergers and Acquisitions? An Analysis Based on Covered Transactions Filed with CFIUS," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 28(2), pages 37-58, March.
    12. Liqiang Chen & Ming Gao, 2020. "The effects of three types of China's official turnover on air quality: A regression discontinuity study," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 1081-1101, September.
    13. Jing Zhang & Yang Liu & Cuicui Liu & Su Guo & Junfu Cui, 2023. "Study on the Spatial and Temporal Evolution of High-Quality Development in Nine Provinces of the Yellow River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    14. Pinglin He & Yulong Sun & Huayu Shen & Jianhui Jian & Zhongfu Yu, 2019. "Does Environmental Tax Affect Energy Efficiency? An Empirical Study of Energy Efficiency in OECD Countries Based on DEA and Logit Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-21, July.
    15. Yu, Shiwei & Zheng, Yali & Hu, Xing & Shu, Kesheng, 2022. "Spatial impacts of biomass resource endowment on provincial green development efficiency," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 651-662.
    16. Yao, Wanxiang & Zheng, Zhimiao & Zhao, Jun & Wang, Xiao & Wang, Yan & Li, Xianli & Fu, Jidong, 2020. "The factor analysis of fog and haze under the coupling of multiple factors -- taking four Chinese cities as an example," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    17. Browning, Morgan S. & Lenox, Carol S., 2020. "Contribution of offshore wind to the power grid: U.S. air quality implications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    18. Jingjing Zeng & Meiquan Jiang & Meng Yuan, 2020. "Environmental Risk Perception, Risk Culture, and Pro-Environmental Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-18, March.
    19. Nepal, Rabindra & Musibau, Hammed Oluwaseyi & Jamasb, Tooraj, 2021. "Energy consumption as an indicator of energy efficiency and emissions in the European Union: A GMM based quantile regression approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    20. Zhang, Pan & Wang, Huan, 2022. "Do provincial energy policies and energy intensity targets help reduce CO2 emissions? Evidence from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:22:p:6519-:d:288583. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.