IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i21p6095-d282797.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aging-Suitability of Urban Waterfront Open Spaces in Gongchen Bridge Section of the Grand Canal

Author

Listed:
  • Min Gong

    (Department of Architecture, Zhejiang University City College, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Mengyu Ren

    (College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Qin Dai

    (Department of Architecture, Zhejiang University City College, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Xiaoyu Luo

    (College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

Abstract

Aging has become a worldwide issue in the 21st century. China became an aging society in 1999, and home-based care is now the main mode of care for the elderly. Present research on the aging-suitability of spaces mainly focuses on the interior and exterior environmental conditions of the home, ignoring public open spaces at the regional and urban levels, with a specific lack of research on waterfront open spaces, which is an important type of public open space in Jiangnan Watertown. The study used the example of the waterfront space of the Hangzhou Gongchen Bridge section of the Grand Canal, the longest artificial canal in the world, to analyze the aging-suitability of waterfront open spaces. Firstly, in this section, the activity characteristics of the elderly were surveyed through observation and semi-structured interviews, then the subjective satisfaction of the elderly with the waterfront spaces was investigated. Through correlation and principal component analysis, five common factors affecting the satisfaction of the elderly were obtained: environment, function, transportation, social culture, and vision. Finally, some design suggestions suitable for the elderly were proposed for three aspects: environment, function, and transportation, which are the most important factors affecting the overall subjective satisfaction of the elderly with the waterfront open space. This study provided a reference for the design and planning of aging-friendly waterfront open spaces, which would improve the aging-suitability of urban open spaces, increasing social participation, and enhancing the quality of life of the elderly. It is of profound significance to build a senior-friendly city and deal with the increasingly severe aging problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Min Gong & Mengyu Ren & Qin Dai & Xiaoyu Luo, 2019. "Aging-Suitability of Urban Waterfront Open Spaces in Gongchen Bridge Section of the Grand Canal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-19, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:21:p:6095-:d:282797
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/21/6095/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/21/6095/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Phillips, David R. & Siu, Oi-ling & Yeh, Anthony G.O. & Cheng, Kevin H.C., 2005. "The impacts of dwelling conditions on older persons' psychological well-being in Hong Kong: the mediating role of residential satisfaction," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(12), pages 2785-2797, June.
    2. Ali Keyvanfar & Arezou Shafaghat & Sapura Mohamad & Mu’azu Mohammed Abdullahi & Hamidah Ahmad & Nurul Hidayah Mohd Derus & Majid Khorami, 2018. "A Sustainable Historic Waterfront Revitalization Decision Support Tool for Attracting Tourists," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-23, January.
    3. Yan, Bingqiu & Gao, Xiaolu & Lyon, Michael, 2014. "Modeling satisfaction amongst the elderly in different Chinese urban neighborhoods," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 127-134.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Siya Cheng & Zheran Zhai & Wenzhuo Sun & Yuan Wang & Rui Yu & Xiaoyu Ge, 2022. "Research on the Satisfaction of Beijing Waterfront Green Space Landscape Based on Social Media Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-25, October.
    2. Weiyi Yu & Hong Hu & Bindong Sun, 2021. "Elderly Suitability of Park Recreational Space Layout Based on Visual Landscape Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Maša Filipovič Hrast & Richard Sendi & Boštjan Kerbler, 2020. "Housing Choices of Older People: Staying or Moving in the Case of High Care Needs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Fei Shi & Yuanyuan Lu & Longgao Chen & Wei-Ling Hsu, 2023. "Evaluation of the Sustainable Use of Land Resources in the Cities along the Jiangsu Section of the Beijing–Hangzhou Grand Canal," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-20, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jianxi Feng & Shuangshuang Tang & Xiaowei Chuai, 2018. "The impact of neighbourhood environments on quality of life of elderly people: Evidence from Nanjing, China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(9), pages 2020-2039, July.
    2. Shi Chen & Yi Sun & Bo Kyong Seo, 2022. "The Effects of Public Open Space on Older People’s Well-Being: From Neighborhood Social Cohesion to Place Dependence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Jinhyun Jun, 2023. "Towards Sustainable Urban Riverfront Redevelopment: Adaptability as a Design Strategy for the Hangang Riverfront in Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-22, June.
    4. Younghun Choi & Takuro Kobashi & Yoshiki Yamagata & Akito Murayama, 2021. "Assessment of waterfront office redevelopment plan on optimal building energy demand and rooftop photovoltaics for urban decarbonization," Papers 2108.09029, arXiv.org.
    5. Lei Kang & Zhaoping Yang & Yunxiao Dang & Wenzhong Zhang & Caicai Liu, 2022. "Can Tourism Development Make Cities More Livable? Investigating 40 Cities in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-17, January.
    6. Zydrune Morkunaite & Romualdas Bausys & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, 2019. "Contractor Selection for Sgraffito Decoration of Cultural Heritage Buildings Using the WASPAS-SVNS Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-25, November.
    7. Andrzej Bialas, 2022. "Towards a Software Tool Supporting Decisions in Planning Heap Revitalization Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-33, February.
    8. Ho, Hung Chak & Cheng, Wei & Song, Yimeng & Liu, Yuqi & Guo, Yingqi & Lu, Shiyu & Lum, Terry Yat Sang & Chiu, Rebecca & Webster, Chris, 2022. "Spatial uncertainty and environment-health association: An empirical study of osteoporosis among “old residents” in public housing estates across a hilly environment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    9. Yang Zhang & Agnes E. Van den Berg & Terry Van Dijk & Gerd Weitkamp, 2017. "Quality over Quantity: Contribution of Urban Green Space to Neighborhood Satisfaction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-10, May.
    10. Kevin Cheng & David Phillips & Oi-Ling Siu & Anthony Yeh, 2014. "Patterns of Residential Adjustment for Older Person: Who will Recover and How Do They Recover? A Study in Different Residential Environments in Hong Kong," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 119(1), pages 295-319, October.
    11. Ruohan Zhang & Jialan Zhang & Kuan Zhang & Dingde Xu & Yanbin Qi & Xin Deng, 2024. "Do Clean Toilets Help Improve Farmers’ Mental Health? Empirical Evidence from China’s Rural Toilet Revolution," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, January.
    12. Pan, Zhuolin & Liu, Yuqi & Liu, Ye & Huo, Ziwen & Han, Wenchao, 2024. "Age-friendly neighbourhood environment, functional abilities and life satisfaction: A longitudinal analysis of older adults in urban China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    13. Yan, Bingqiu & Gao, Xiaolu & Lyon, Michael, 2014. "Modeling satisfaction amongst the elderly in different Chinese urban neighborhoods," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 127-134.
    14. Ming Guan & Hongyi Guan, 2024. "Sense of community and residential well-being among rural-urban migrants in China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    15. Jianbo Han & Edwin H. W. Chan & Esther H. K. Yung & Queena K. Qian & Patrick T. I. Lam, 2022. "A Policy Framework for Producing Age-Friendly Communities from the Perspective of Production of Space," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-23, February.
    16. Yafei Liu & Martin Dijst & Stan Geertman, 2017. "The subjective well-being of older adults in Shanghai: The role of residential environment and individual resources," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(7), pages 1692-1714, May.
    17. Thomson, Hilary & Thomas, Sian, 2015. "Developing empirically supported theories of change for housing investment and health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 205-214.
    18. Younghun Choi & Takuro Kobashi & Yoshiki Yamagata & Akito Murayama, 2022. "Assessment of Waterfront Office Redevelopment Plan on Optimal Building Arrangements with Rooftop Photovoltaics: A Case Study for Shinagawa, Tokyo," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, January.
    19. Sun, Bindong & Liu, Jiahang & Yin, Chun & Cao, Jason, 2022. "Residential and workplace neighborhood environments and life satisfaction: Exploring chain-mediation effects of activity and place satisfaction," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    20. Chen, Di & Wang, Chunyan & Liu, Yi, 2023. "How household food shopping behaviors changed during COVID-19 lockdown period: Evidence from Beijing, China," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:21:p:6095-:d:282797. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.