IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i21p5989-d281067.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Creative Street Regeneration in the Context of Socio-Spatial Sustainability: A Case Study of a Traditional City Centre in Podgorica, Montenegro

Author

Listed:
  • Svetlana K. Perović

    (Faculty of Architecture, University of Montenegro, Džordža Vašingtona bb, 81 000 Podgorica, Montenegro)

  • Jelena Bajić Šestović

    (Faculty of Architecture, University of Montenegro, Džordža Vašingtona bb, 81 000 Podgorica, Montenegro)

Abstract

The physical structure of Podgorica was predominantly developed with a traditional planning concept, whereby public open spaces of the city are as important as the city’s architectural objects. The focus of this paper is the perception of a traditional street in the context of sustainable urban regeneration. The aim of this study is to submit a proposal, through the Urban Design course at the Faculty of Architecture in Podgorica, for the physical regeneration of twelve traditional streets (eight street directions) that define the central core of Podgorica, known as Mirkova Varoš. These streets are the sites of social processes, interpreters of cultural and identity values of the society, and primary keepers of collective memory. It was detected that the attractiveness of the case study streets is weakening due to inadequate social and professional engagement in the processes of preservation and regeneration over time and also due to new users’ needs. Global requirements reflect the weakened role of public open spaces as places of social interaction, in favour of primarily closed shopping centres that are the new urban artefacts of the 21st century city. The first phase of this study is related to the theoretical interpretation of regeneration and the role of public space in the context of socio-spatial sustainability. The second phase of the study is directed toward estimating the perception of the current state of the street area in Mirova Varoš, as seen by the case study area users and architecture students, using (1) visual, (2) tactile, and (3) auditory criteria. The obtained results serve as a platform for concrete urban design proposals for sustainable street regeneration that will reflect a stronger socio-spatial interaction between (1) user–place, (2) the place–city system, and (3) local processes–global flows.

Suggested Citation

  • Svetlana K. Perović & Jelena Bajić Šestović, 2019. "Creative Street Regeneration in the Context of Socio-Spatial Sustainability: A Case Study of a Traditional City Centre in Podgorica, Montenegro," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-25, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:21:p:5989-:d:281067
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/21/5989/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/21/5989/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Hall, 2000. "Creative Cities and Economic Development," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(4), pages 639-649, April.
    2. Jeremy Németh & Justin Hollander, 2010. "Security Zones and New York City's Shrinking Public Space," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 20-34, March.
    3. Florian Langstraat & Rianne Van Melik, 2013. "Challenging the 'End of Public Space': A Comparative Analysis of Publicness in British and Dutch Urban Spaces," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 429-448, August.
    4. Soomi Kim & Hyun-ah Kwon, 2018. "Urban Sustainability through Public Architecture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, April.
    5. Rosemary D F Bromley & Andrew R Tallon & Colin J Thomas, 2003. "Disaggregating the Space–Time Layers of City-Centre Activities and Their Users," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 35(10), pages 1831-1851, October.
    6. Matthew Carmona & Claudio De Magalhaes, 2006. "Public Space Management: Present and Potential," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(1), pages 75-99.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. YuLing Tsai & Bart Julien Dewancker & Athina Ardhyanto, 2023. "Urban-Rural Revitalization Space for Sustainable Social Value: An Evaluation in Redesigning Built Environment in Taiwan," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, March.
    2. Hawar Himdad J. Sektani & Mahmood Khayat & Masi Mohammadi & Ana Pereira Roders, 2021. "Erbil City Built Heritage and Wellbeing: An Assessment of Local Perceptions Using the Semantic Differential Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Rasha A. Moussa, 2023. "A Responsive Approach for Designing Shared Urban Spaces in Tourist Villages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-27, May.
    4. Yuhan Shao & Xinyu Xu & Like Jiang & Romain Crastes dit Sourd, 2020. "Economic Valuation of the Renewal of Urban Streets: A Choice Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giuseppe Attanasi & Ylenia Curci & Patrick Llerena & Maria del Pino Ramos-Sosa & Adriana Carolina Pinate & Giulia Urso, 2019. "Looking at Creativity from East to West: Risk Taking and Intrinsic Motivation in Socially and Culturally Diverse Countries," Working Papers of BETA 2019-38, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    2. Junlae Kim & Seiyong Kim, 2020. "The Impact of Population Characteristics and Government Budgets on the Sustainability of Public Buildings in Korea’s Regional Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-15, July.
    3. Seungil Yum, 2019. "The interaction between knowledge-intensive business services and urban economy," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 63(1), pages 53-83, August.
    4. Ye Seul Choi & Up Lim, 2015. "Effects of Regional Creative Milieu on Interregional Migration of the Highly Educated in Korea: Evidence from Hierarchical Cross-Classified Linear Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Nathan, Max, 2022. "Does light touch cluster policy work? Evaluating the tech city programme," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(9).
    6. Peter Mayerhofer & Oliver Fritz & Dieter Pennerstorfer, 2010. "Dritter Bericht zur internationalen Wettbewerbsfähigkeit Wiens," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 42430, August.
    7. Rik Wenting & Oedzge Atzema & Koen Frenken, 2008. "Urban Amenities or Agglomeration Economies? Locational Behaviour and Entrepreneurial Success of Dutch Fashion Designers," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 0803, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jan 2008.
    8. Helene Martin‐Brelot & Michel Grossetti & Denis Eckert & Olga Gritsai & Zoltán Kovács, 2010. "The Spatial Mobility of the ‘Creative Class’: A European Perspective," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 854-870, December.
    9. Arauzo Carod, Josep Maria & Coll Martínez, Eva & Turcu, Camelia, 2018. "Where New Creative Industries Locate? Evidence from French Departments," Working Papers 2072/307042, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
    10. Francisco Ruiz Vicente & Alberto Zapatera Llinares & Nicolás Montés Sánchez, 2020. "“Sustainable City”: A Steam Project Using Robotics to Bring the City of the Future to Primary Education Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-21, November.
    11. Robert Socha & Bogusław Kogut, 2020. "Urban Video Surveillance as a Tool to Improve Security in Public Spaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-12, August.
    12. Marina van Geenhuizen & Peter Nijkamp (ed.), 2012. "Creative Knowledge Cities," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14402.
    13. Sanober Naheed & Salman Shooshtarian, 2022. "The Role of Cultural Heritage in Promoting Urban Sustainability: A Brief Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, September.
    14. Gunwoo Kim, 2016. "The Public Value of Urban Vacant Land: Social Responses and Ecological Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-19, May.
    15. Yannick Oliveira & Suguru Mori & Rie Nomura, 2023. "Common Space and Behavior at the Border between Slum and Metropolitan Area: The Case of “Catambor” and “Alvalade”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-28, March.
    16. Jaekyung Lee & Galen Newman & Yunmi Park, 2018. "A Comparison of Vacancy Dynamics between Growing and Shrinking Cities Using the Land Transformation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17, May.
    17. Koutra, Sesil & Becue, Vincent & Ioakimidis, Christos S., 2019. "Searching for the ‘smart’ definition through its spatial approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 924-936.
    18. Joachim Michael Espina & Suguru Mori & Rie Nomura, 2018. "An Analysis of Environment Behavior Relationships towards the Design of a Local Mixed-used Street: Based on Behavior Settings of Belgium Street in Cebu City, Philippines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, September.
    19. Mila Freire & Mario Polèse & Pamela Echeverria, 2003. "Connecting Cities with Macroeconomic Concerns : The Missing Link," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 15058.
    20. Dameri, Renata Paola & Benevolo, Clara & Veglianti, Eleonora & Li, Yaya, 2019. "Understanding smart cities as a glocal strategy: A comparison between Italy and China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 26-41.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:21:p:5989-:d:281067. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.