IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i19p5516-d273806.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Management Scale Assessment of Practices to Mitigate Cattle Microbial Water Quality Impairments of Coastal Waters

Author

Listed:
  • David J. Lewis

    (University of California Cooperative Extension, Novato, CA 94947, USA)

  • Dylan Voeller

    (Point Reyes National Seashore, Point Reyes Station, CA 94956, USA)

  • Tina L. Saitone

    (Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA)

  • Kenneth W. Tate

    (Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA)

Abstract

Coastal areas support multiple important resource uses including recreation, aquaculture, and agriculture. Unmanaged cattle access to stream corridors in grazed coastal watersheds can contaminate surface waters with fecal-derived microbial pollutants, posing risk to human health via activities such as swimming and shellfish consumption. Improved managerial control of cattle access to streams through implementation of grazing best management practices (BMPs) is a critical step in mitigating waterborne microbial pollution in grazed watersheds. This paper reports trend analysis of a 19-year dataset to assess long-term microbial water quality responses resulting from a program to implement 40 grazing BMPs within the Olema Creek Watershed, a primary tributary to Tomales Bay, USA. Stream corridor grazing BMPs implemented included: (1) Stream corridor fencing to eliminate/control cattle access, (2) hardened stream crossings for cattle movements across stream corridors, and (3) off stream drinking water systems for cattle. We found a statistically significant reduction in fecal coliform concentrations following the initial period of BMP implementation, with overall mean reductions exceeding 95% (1.28 log 10 )—consistent with 1—2 log 10 (90–99%) reductions reported in other studies. Our results demonstrate the importance of prioritization of pollutant sources at the watershed scale to target BMP implementation for rapid water quality improvements and return on investment. Our findings support investments in grazing BMP implementation as an important component of policies and strategies to protect public health in grazed coastal watersheds.

Suggested Citation

  • David J. Lewis & Dylan Voeller & Tina L. Saitone & Kenneth W. Tate, 2019. "Management Scale Assessment of Practices to Mitigate Cattle Microbial Water Quality Impairments of Coastal Waters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-10, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:19:p:5516-:d:273806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/19/5516/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/19/5516/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kelsey L. Derose & Leslie M. Roche & David F. Lile & Danny J. Eastburn & Kenneth W. Tate, 2020. "Microbial Water Quality Conditions Associated with Livestock Grazing, Recreation, and Rural Residences in Mixed-Use Landscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Ermanno Affuso & John Reid Cummings & Donald Alex Beebe & Steven R. Schultze, 2022. "Endogenous, Regime-Switching Hedonic Estimation of Commercial Waterway Water Quality Impact on Home Values in the Alabama Black Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:19:p:5516-:d:273806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.