IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i18p4965-d266295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Constructing an Evaluation Model for User Experience in an Unmanned Store

Author

Listed:
  • Chi-Hung Lo

    (Department of Industrial Design, Tunghai University, Taichung 40704, Taiwan)

  • Yi-Wen Wang

    (Digital Innovation, Tunghai University, Taichung 40704, Taiwan)

Abstract

Traditional stores feature three characteristics: the goods, convenience, and the service provided to its customers (users). Due to the development of the online/offline omni channel consumption model, the starting point for supplying the user with services is no longer the time at which a user arrives at the store door. Instead, it is expected that services can be merged seamlessly into users’ lives at any point in time. Convenience and quality of service can be maximized and optimized via any medium or device. Therefore, in light of the foreseen commercial requirements of the supply end, we introduce a strategy for implementing intelligent equipment in order to achieve the goals of enhanced efficiency and reduced manpower. We investigate the possibility of traditional stores being replaced by other types of convenient store. This study investigates the experience evaluation of unmanned stores with respect to three dimensions: the economic experience, marketing experience, and qualia experience. A case study approach is implemented in this study. The goal is to investigate the course of the user experience in the X-Store, which was founded by the Uni-President Enterprises Corporation in Taiwan. By determining the relationship between users’ interactions with tangible and intangible objects, it is possible to understand the reasons behind the insufficiency in a bad user experience. It is then possible to deal with the insufficiency represented by an intangible service guidance interface, rather than the single and tangible factor of there being no clerks. Finally, a type I quantification theory is applied to the quantification of qualitative data. It is known that the elements corresponding to higher user ratings include, respectively, entertaining setting, positive sensory experience, and innovative products or facilities. The most representative factors for these elements include an interactive drinks cabinet, a futuristic layout, and facial recognition. In contrast, the elements of lower satisfaction level include a setting far from feelings of hustle and bustle, the experience of being introduced to new ideas (thinking), and facilities that are easy to operate. The most representative factors behind these elements include being unable to perform immersive shopping, there being no memory of limited-edition souvenirs, and apps that are not good to use. The contributions of this study are twofold. Firstly, we provide an evaluation of user experience for the first unmanned store in Taiwan, along with a subsequent ranking of the factors. This could provide companies with a reference for either maintaining or improving upon their current state. Secondly, we analyzed the five-stage experience activities for the embodiment of the interactive relationship between users and other people who were analyzed. Any follow-up changes to user influence can be traced back by means of this approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Chi-Hung Lo & Yi-Wen Wang, 2019. "Constructing an Evaluation Model for User Experience in an Unmanned Store," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-29, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:18:p:4965-:d:266295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/18/4965/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/18/4965/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lin Feng & Wei Wei, 2019. "An Empirical Study on User Experience Evaluation and Identification of Critical UX Issues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Margherita Pillan & Fiammetta Costa & Marco Aureggi, 2019. "The Complexity of Simple Goals: Case Study of a User-Centred Thermoregulation System for Smart Living and Optimal Energy Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Nan Ma & Hing-wah Chau & Jin Zhou & Masa Noguchi, 2017. "Structuring the Environmental Experience Design Research Framework through Selected Aged Care Facility Data Analyses in Victoria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Lin Feng & Baoping Sun & Kai Wang & Sang-Bing Tsai, 2018. "An Empirical Study on the Design of Digital Content Products from a Big Data Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sheng-Chi Chen & Shari S. C. Shang, 2021. "Sustaining User Experience in a Smart System in the Retail Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Szabó-Szentgróti Eszter & Rámháp Szabolcs & Kézai Petra Kinga, 2023. "Systematic Review of Cashierless Stores (Just Walk Out Stores) Revolutionizing The Retail," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 18(s1), pages 427-448, December.
    3. Na Yu & Yi-Ting Huang, 2020. "Important Factors Affecting User Experience Design and Satisfaction of a Mobile Health App—A Case Study of Daily Yoga App," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-16, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin Feng & Wei Wei, 2020. "A Combined Method of r-NPS and t-NPS Evaluations for Identification of Negative Triggers of Detractors’ Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Sergio Pardo-Jaramillo & Andrés Muñoz-Villamizar & Ignacio Osuna & Rolando Roncancio, 2020. "Mapping Research on Customer Centricity and Sustainable Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Weidong Dai, 2019. "V-Shaped Responsibility of China’s Social Welfare for the Elderly: Based on Analyzing Historical Evolution and Future Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-13, April.
    4. Shobhana Chandra & Sanjeev Verma, 2023. "Big Data and Sustainable Consumption: A Review and Research Agenda," Vision, , vol. 27(1), pages 11-23, February.
    5. Russell Tatenda Munodawafa & Satirenjit Kaur Johl, 2019. "Big Data Analytics Capabilities and Eco-Innovation: A Study of Energy Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-21, August.
    6. Lin Feng & Wei Wei, 2019. "An Empirical Study on User Experience Evaluation and Identification of Critical UX Issues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    7. Mashael Alghareeb & Abdulmohsen Saud Albesher & Amna Asif, 2023. "Studying Users’ Perceptions of COVID-19 Mobile Applications in Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:18:p:4965-:d:266295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.