Author
Listed:
- Kaidi Zhang
(School of Environmental and Geographical Sciences (SEGS), Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China
Research Center of Urban Ecology and Environment, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China)
- Yuan Gong
(Department of Environmental Science, College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
Collaborative Innovation Center of Sustainable Forestry in Southern China of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)
- Hao Fa
(School of Environmental and Geographical Sciences (SEGS), Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China
Research Center of Urban Ecology and Environment, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China)
- Min Zhao
(Research Center of Urban Ecology and Environment, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China)
Abstract
Shanghai, China, is a city that is relatively representative of various cities in China due to its geographical location and socio-economic dynamics. The role of urban vegetation in the carbon cycle of urban developments in these types of cities is now being studied. We focus on identifying which urban plant community types have a greater influence on CO 2 flux in cities, thus providing a scientific basis for low-carbon urban greening. Based on the eddy covariance (EC) observation system, ART Footprint Tool, plant inventory, and ecological community classification, we show that the CO 2 flux characteristics of different plant communities vary temporally. The carbon sink duration during summer was the longest (up to 10 h) and the carbon sink duration was the shortest during winter (7.5 h). In addition, we discovered that the CO 2 flux contribution rates of different plant community types are distinct. The annual average CO 2 contribution rates of the Cinnamomum camphora - Trachycarpus fortunei community and the Metasequoia glyptostroboides + Sabina chinensis community are 11.88% and 0.93%, respectively. The CO 2 flux contribution rate of the same plant community differs according to season. The CO 2 contribution rate of the Cinnamomum camphora - Trachycarpus fortunei community exhibits local maxima during winter and summer, with a maximum difference of 11.16%. In contrast, the Metasequoia glyptostroboides + Sabina chinensis community has a CO 2 contribution rate of 0.35% during the same period. In general, summer is the season with the lowest CO 2 flux contribution rate of plant communities, and winter is the season with the highest CO 2 flux contribution rate. However, the Cinnamomum camphora + Salix babylonica community and the Cinnamomum camphora + Sabina chinensis community present the opposite pattern. Finally, the diurnal variation characteristics of CO 2 flux in different communities have the same trend, but the peak values differ significantly. Overall, daily CO 2 flux peak value of the Metasequoia glyptostroboides community and the Cinnamomum camphora - Trachycarpus fortunei community indicate that these two plant communities exhibit a strong capacity for CO 2 absorption in the study area. According to these research results, urban greening efforts in subtropical climates can increase the green space covered by the Cinnamomum camphora - Trachycarpus fortunei and the Metasequoia glyptostroboides community types when urban greening, so as to appropriately reduce the CO 2 emitted into the atmosphere.
Suggested Citation
Kaidi Zhang & Yuan Gong & Hao Fa & Min Zhao, 2019.
"CO 2 Flux Characteristics of Different Plant Communities in a Subtropical Urban Ecosystem,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-13, September.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:18:p:4879-:d:264717
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:18:p:4879-:d:264717. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.