IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i17p4517-d259417.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Between Environmental Utilization and Protection: Adolescent Conceptions of Biodiversity

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer Schneiderhan-Opel

    (Centre of Math & Science Education (Z-MNU), Department of Biology Education, University of Bayreuth, NW1, 95447 Bayreuth, Germany)

  • Franz X. Bogner

    (Centre of Math & Science Education (Z-MNU), Department of Biology Education, University of Bayreuth, NW1, 95447 Bayreuth, Germany)

Abstract

As human activities threaten biodiversity on a global scale, preventing further biodiversity loss requires scientifically literate and environmentally responsible citizens. Biodiversity education (BE) as part of education for sustainable development (ESD) may lay the foundation of fostering a sense of responsibility for biodiversity and its preservation among future generations. Meaningful learning depends on the integration of new knowledge into already existing student conceptions (i.e., students’ pre-instructional mental concepts and ideas of teaching subjects). Thus, assessment and consideration of student conceptions on biodiversity are of high relevance for the development of successful BE and ESD lessons. In the present qualitative study, we applied three open-ended questions in a paper-and-pencil format to assess adolescents’ pre-instructional conceptions on biodiversity, its benefits, and protection. Almost our total sample of 275 German 10th graders equated biodiversity with species diversity, revealing an only fragmented understanding of the scientific concept of biodiversity. Conceptions of the benefits of biodiversity were almost equally balanced between environmental and economic benefits. Notions of environmental preservation considerably outnumbered notions of environmental utilization in student conceptions of biodiversity protection.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer Schneiderhan-Opel & Franz X. Bogner, 2019. "Between Environmental Utilization and Protection: Adolescent Conceptions of Biodiversity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-14, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:17:p:4517-:d:259417
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/17/4517/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/17/4517/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Renan de Almeida Barbosa & Christoph Randler & José Vicente Lima Robaina, 2021. "Values and Environmental Knowledge of Student Participants of Climate Strikes: A Comparative Perspective between Brazil and Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Jennifer Schneiderhan-Opel & Franz X. Bogner, 2020. "The Relation between Knowledge Acquisition and Environmental Values within the Scope of a Biodiversity Learning Module," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Hortensia Morón-Monge & María del Carmen Morón-Monge & Daniel Abril-López & María Paula Daza Navarro, 2020. "An Approach to Prospective Primary School Teachers’ Concept of Environment and Biodiversity through their Design of Educational Itineraries: Validation of an Evaluation Rubric," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-21, July.
    4. Flora Piasentin & Rosalina Gabriel & Ana M. Arroz & Alexandra R. Silva & Isabel R. Amorim, 2021. "What Is Most Desirable for Nature? An Analysis of Azorean Pupils’ Biodiversity Perspectives When Deciding on Ecological Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-21, November.
    5. Hortensia Morón-Monge & Soraya Hamed & María del Carmen Morón Monge, 2021. "How Do Children Perceive the Biodiversity of Their nearby Environment: An Analysis of Drawings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:17:p:4517-:d:259417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.