Author
Listed:
- Bin Wu
(Center for Ecological Research, Northeast Forestry University, No.26 Hexing Road Xiangfang District, Harbin 150040, China
Ministry of Education Key Laboratoty of Sustainable Forest Ecosystem Management, Northeast Forestry University, No.26 Hexing Road Xiangfang District, Harbin 150040, China)
- Changcheng Mu
(Center for Ecological Research, Northeast Forestry University, No.26 Hexing Road Xiangfang District, Harbin 150040, China
Ministry of Education Key Laboratoty of Sustainable Forest Ecosystem Management, Northeast Forestry University, No.26 Hexing Road Xiangfang District, Harbin 150040, China)
- Jiaqi Zhao
(Center for Ecological Research, Northeast Forestry University, No.26 Hexing Road Xiangfang District, Harbin 150040, China)
- Xuejiao Zhou
(Center for Ecological Research, Northeast Forestry University, No.26 Hexing Road Xiangfang District, Harbin 150040, China)
- Junhui Zhang
(State Key Laboratory of Forest and Soil Ecology, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 72 Wenhua Road Shenhe District, Shenyang 110016, China)
Abstract
The effects of replacing over-mature forest with secondary forests and plantations are significant for terrestrial ecosystem carbon (C) dynamics. However, the carbon balance and recovery time of this replacement process remain unclear. This study measured the fluxes of CH 4 and CO 2 in soils and the annual net C sequestration (ANCS) from seven ecosystems with different vegetation types (over-mature forest (OMF), Korean pine plantation (KPP), hardwood forest (HWF), Betula platyphylla forest (BPF), Populous davidiana forest (PDF), mixed deciduous forest (MDF), and Mongolian oak forest (MOF)) using the static chamber-gas chromatography method and the relative growth equation method. We examined the effects of environmental factors (e.g., air and soil temperature, soil volumetric water content (SVWC), soil pH, nitrate nitrogen (NO 3 − -N), ammonium nitrogen (NH 4 + -N), and soil organic carbon (SOC)) on CH 4 and CO 2 fluxes at the Maoershan Ecosystem Research Station in Northeast China. The carbon source or sink of OMF, KPP, and five secondary forests (HWF, BPF, PDF, MDF, and MOF) were then evaluated based on net ecosystem C balance. The results revealed that the mean annual CH 4 fluxes varied between −0.046 and −0.077 mg m −2 h −1 . The mean annual absorption of CH 4 in the secondary forests and OMF were respectively 1.09–1.67 times and 1.11 times higher than that of KPP (0.046 mg m −2 h −1 , p < 0.05). The mean annual CO 2 fluxes varied between 140.425 and 250.023 mg m −2 h −1 . The CO 2 fluxes in the secondary forests and KPP soils were respectively 1.33–1.78 times and 1.16 times higher than that of OMF (140.425 mg m −2 h −1 , p < 0.05). The CH 4 and CO 2 fluxes were mainly influenced by air and soil temperature, SVWC, soil pH, NO 3 − -N, NH 4 + -N, and SOC in Northeast China. The ANCS of vegetation (3.41 ± 0.27 − 6.26 ± 0.75 t C ha −1 y −1 ) varied widely among different forest types: KPP had the largest ANCS (6.26 ± 0.75 t C ha −1 y −1 , which was higher than secondary forests and OMF by 1.20–1.84 times and 1.46 times, respectively, p > 0.05). Carbon sources and sinks were significantly different among the seven types of vegetation: OMF and KPP were observed to be the greatest C sinks, and secondary forests were shown to be the weakest carbon sinks or net C sources in the study region.
Suggested Citation
Bin Wu & Changcheng Mu & Jiaqi Zhao & Xuejiao Zhou & Junhui Zhang, 2019.
"Effects on Carbon Sources and Sinks from Conversion of Over-Mature Forest to Major Secondary Forests and Korean Pine Plantation in Northeast China,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-21, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:15:p:4232-:d:254912
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:15:p:4232-:d:254912. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.