IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i15p4042-d251914.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conceptualising Tourism Sustainability and Operationalising Its Assessment: Evidence from a Mediterranean Community of Projects

Author

Listed:
  • Spyros Niavis

    (Department of Economic and Regional Development, Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences, 176 71 Athens, Greece)

  • Theodora Papatheochari

    (Department of Economic and Regional Development, Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences, 176 71 Athens, Greece)

  • Yannis Psycharis

    (Department of Economic and Regional Development, Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences, 176 71 Athens, Greece)

  • Josep Rodriguez

    (Tourism Technical Office, Barcelona Provincial Council, 08028 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Xavier Font

    (Tourism Technical Office, Barcelona Provincial Council, 08028 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Anna Martinez Codina

    (Tourism Technical Office, Barcelona Provincial Council, 08028 Barcelona, Spain)

Abstract

Sustainable tourism development is considered an essential challenge for improving resource management in coastal and maritime areas. In this context, various initiatives have been developed for facilitating the assessment and monitoring of tourism sustainability. Nevertheless, the perception of sustainability varies across different tourism stakeholders, since they approach tourism development under different perspectives while the issue of data availability has been a great barrier in measuring sustainability. The present paper examines the perceptions of sustainability observed over a Community of projects with the common aim of enhancing coastal and maritime tourism sustainability at the Mediterranean. Based on surveys, the Community of projects conceptualizes sustainability, reveals their own strategies in operationalizing sustainability assessment and evaluates the usefulness and the main gaps of various sustainability assessment toolkits. The findings of the study signify that tourism sustainability is a broad concept allowing for different interpretations. The assessment of sustainability seems to be affected by the perception and weight attributed to the economic, social, environmental, and governance pillar of sustainability by each project. Finally, the applicability of international assessment toolkits could be questioned as these do not reflect the objectives of the projects and tailored made approaches are considered as essential for operationalizing sustainability assessments.

Suggested Citation

  • Spyros Niavis & Theodora Papatheochari & Yannis Psycharis & Josep Rodriguez & Xavier Font & Anna Martinez Codina, 2019. "Conceptualising Tourism Sustainability and Operationalising Its Assessment: Evidence from a Mediterranean Community of Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-18, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:15:p:4042-:d:251914
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/15/4042/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/15/4042/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tomás B. Ramos, 2019. "Sustainability Assessment: Exploring the Frontiers and Paradigms of Indicator Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Doru Marian Tudorache & Tamara Simon & Cristi Frenț & Mărioara Musteaţă-Pavel, 2017. "Difficulties and Challenges in Applying the European Tourism Indicators System (ETIS) for Sustainable Tourist Destinations: The Case of Braşov County in the Romanian Carpathians," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Torres-Delgado, Anna & Palomeque, Francesc López, 2014. "Measuring sustainable tourism at the municipal level," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 122-137.
    4. Patrizia Modica & Alessandro Capocchi & Ilaria Foroni & Mariangela Zenga, 2018. "An Assessment of the Implementation of the European Tourism Indicator System for Sustainable Destinations in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, September.
    5. Jie Zhao & Suping Fang & Peiquan Jin, 2018. "Modeling and Quantifying User Acceptance of Personalized Business Modes Based on TAM, Trust and Attitude," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-26, January.
    6. Porter, Constance Elise & Donthu, Naveen, 2006. "Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine Internet usage: The role of perceived access barriers and demographics," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(9), pages 999-1007, September.
    7. Sarudzai Mutana & Geoffrey Mukwada, 2017. "An Exploratory Assessment of Significant Tourism Sustainability Indicators for a Montane-Based Route in the Drakensberg Mountains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-16, July.
    8. Alain Dupeyras & Neil MacCallum, 2013. "Indicators for Measuring Competitiveness in Tourism: A Guidance Document," OECD Tourism Papers 2013/2, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Crabolu, Gloria & Font, Xavier & Eker, Sibel, 2023. "Evaluating policy complexity with Causal Loop Diagrams," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    2. Eckert Elena & Hartmann Rainer, 2020. "Measuring sustainability in tourism destinations: Adaptation of indicator sets to local conditions illustrated by the example of Windhoek, Namibia," Zeitschrift für Tourismuswissenschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 12(3), pages 370-390, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ilaria Foroni & Patrizia Modica & Mariangela Zenga, 2019. "Residents’ Satisfaction with Tourism and the European Tourism Indicator System in South Sardinia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.
    2. M. Isabel Diéguez-Castrillón & Ana Gueimonde-Canto & Nuria Rodríguez-López, 2022. "Sustainability indicators for tourism destinations: bibliometric analysis and proposed research agenda," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(10), pages 11548-11575, October.
    3. Fabio Zagonari, 2019. "Multi-Criteria, Cost-Benefit, and Life-Cycle Analyses for Decision-Making to Support Responsible, Sustainable, and Alternative Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-35, February.
    4. Patrizia Modica & Alessandro Capocchi & Ilaria Foroni & Mariangela Zenga, 2018. "An Assessment of the Implementation of the European Tourism Indicator System for Sustainable Destinations in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, September.
    5. Damiano De Marchi & Rudy Becarelli & Leonardo Di Sarli, 2022. "Tourism Sustainability Index: Measuring Tourism Sustainability Based on the ETIS Toolkit, by Exploring Tourist Satisfaction via Sentiment Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Giovanna Acampa & Mariolina Grasso & Giorgia Marino & Claudia Mariaserena Parisi, 2020. "Tourist Flow Management: Social Impact Evaluation through Social Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, January.
    7. Sorin-Romulus Berinde & Adrian-Gabriel Corpădean, 2019. "Assessing the Sustainable Room for Growth for a Particular Romanian Tourism Area of Business: The Case of Accommodation Businesses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, January.
    8. Enrico Conti & Laura Grassini & Catia Monicolini, 2020. "Tourism competitiveness of Italian municipalities," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 54(5), pages 1745-1767, December.
    9. Canmian Liu & Ruyun Zhang & Min Wang & Jing Xu, 2018. "Measurement and Prediction of Regional Tourism Sustainability: An Analysis of the Yangtze River Economic Zone, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-20, April.
    10. Francesca Nocca & Martina Bosone & Pasquale De Toro & Luigi Fusco Girard, 2023. "Towards the Human Circular Tourism: Recommendations, Actions, and Multidimensional Indicators for the Tourist Category," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, January.
    11. Yoshida, Masayuki & James, Jeffrey D. & Cronin, J. Joseph, 2013. "Sport event innovativeness: Conceptualization, measurement, and its impact on consumer behavior," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 68-84.
    12. Bojan KRSTIĆ & Sonja JOVANOVIC & Tanja STANISIC, 2014. "Central And East European Countries’ Tourism Competitiveness As A Factor Of Their National Competitiveness Level," Revista de turism - studii si cercetari in turism / Journal of tourism - studies and research in tourism, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration - Economy, Business Administration and Tourism Department., vol. 18(18), pages 61-68, December.
    13. Brenda Mak & Paul Beckman & Nicole Bohn, 2016. "Perceived Usefulness and Satisfaction of Mobile Phone for Users with Disabilities," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(02), pages 1-16, April.
    14. Sohn, Stefanie, 2017. "A contextual perspective on consumers' perceived usefulness: The case of mobile online shopping," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 22-33.
    15. Yamilé Pérez Guilarte & Daniel Barreiro Quintáns, 2019. "Using Big Data to Measure Tourist Sustainability: Myth or Reality?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-19, October.
    16. Salinas Fernández, José Antonio & Guaita Martínez, José Manuel & Martín Martín, José María, 2022. "An analysis of the competitiveness of the tourism industry in a context of economic recovery following the COVID19 pandemic," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    17. Dan Ma & Hao Yuan, 2021. "Neighborhood Environment, Internet Use and Mental Distress among Older Adults: The Case of Shanghai, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-12, March.
    18. Richard Stoffle & Octavius Seowtewa & Cameron Kays & Kathleen Van Vlack, 2020. "Sustainable Heritage Tourism: Native American Preservation Recommendations at Arches, Canyonlands, and Hovenweep National Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-34, November.
    19. Sanal Kumar Velayudhan, 2019. "Factors influencing online shopping in rural India: A review," Working papers 314, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.
    20. Tom Brandsma & Jol Stoffers & Ilse Schrijver, 2020. "Advanced Technology Use by Care Professionals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-16, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:15:p:4042-:d:251914. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.