IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2018i1p152-d193748.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Effect of Incorporating Environmental Water Requirement in the Water Stress Index for Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Pariyapat Nilsalab

    (The Joint Graduate School of Energy and Environment (JGSEE), King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi (KMUTT), Bangkok 10140, Thailand
    Center of Excellence on Energy Technology and Environment, PERDO, Bangkok 10140, Thailand)

  • Shabbir H. Gheewala

    (The Joint Graduate School of Energy and Environment (JGSEE), King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi (KMUTT), Bangkok 10140, Thailand
    Center of Excellence on Energy Technology and Environment, PERDO, Bangkok 10140, Thailand)

Abstract

Human and environmental demands for water are both important; therefore, two approaches are proposed for assessing water scarcity using the water stress index. In one of them, the human demand for water explicitly includes environmental water as one of the components (WSI e1 ), whereas in the other, environmental water is explicitly reserved by subtracting it from the water availability (WSI e2 ). The results obtained from using the two approaches in the case of Bang Pakong watershed correspondingly contribute to the explanation of the existing stress situation, especially in the dry season. The stressful results were noticed during December to February for both approaches as a result of less available water and higher environmental water requirement. The assessment of environmental water requirement (EWR) in this study was quantified according to low and high flow periods. The two approaches perform well for assessing water scarcity in the Bang Pakong watershed; however, the result interpretation using the WSI e1 approach is more serious than the WSI e2 approach in terms of water scarcity potential beyond the critical threshold. In conclusion, priority of water allocation is the key consideration for selecting the approach. Higher priority for the environment favors the use of WSI e2 for policy making whereas for a lower priority, the use of WSI e1 . In case of Thailand, the WSI e2 approach would be recommended in order to put the EWR as the first priority. Then, water allocation priorities can be rearranged only for human demands for water while the EWR is already safeguarded by setting it aside.

Suggested Citation

  • Pariyapat Nilsalab & Shabbir H. Gheewala, 2018. "Assessing the Effect of Incorporating Environmental Water Requirement in the Water Stress Index for Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2018:i:1:p:152-:d:193748
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/1/152/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/1/152/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Smakhtin, V., 2002. "Environmental water needs and impacts of irrigated agriculture in river basins: A framework for a new research program," IWMI Working Papers H029686, International Water Management Institute.
    2. Pariyapat Nilsalab & Shabbir H. Gheewala & Stephan Pfister, 2018. "Method Development for Including Environmental Water Requirement in the Water Stress Index," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(5), pages 1585-1598, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Phoupet Kyophilapong, 2009. "The Impact of Irrigation on Aquatic Wetland Resources - A Case Study of That Luang Marsh, Lao PDR," EEPSEA Research Report rr2009031, Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA), revised Mar 2009.
    2. Sidibé, Yoro & Foudi, Sébastien & Pascual, Unai & Termansen, Mette, 2018. "Adaptation to Climate Change in Rainfed Agriculture in the Global South: Soil Biodiversity as Natural Insurance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 588-596.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2018:i:1:p:152-:d:193748. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.