IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i9p3279-d169780.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Changes in the Assortment and Species Structure of Timber Harvested from the Polish Managed Part of Białowieża Forest

Author

Listed:
  • Dariusz Zastocki

    (Department of Forest Utilization, Faculty of Forestry, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Hubert Lachowicz

    (Department of Forest Utilization, Faculty of Forestry, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Jarosław Sadowski

    (Department of Forest Utilization, Faculty of Forestry, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Tadeusz Moskalik

    (Department of Forest Utilization, Faculty of Forestry, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

The subject of the research, which is the Polish managed part of Białowieża Forest together with Białowieża National Park, a remnant of primeval forests, is one of the most valuable forest areas in Europe. This article presents the history of the use of these forests. The assortment and species structure of the harvested timber was analyzed in detail for the Białowieża, Browsk, and Hajnówka Forest Districts from 2008 to 2017. The research is based on data from the State Forests Information System (SILP) and Forest Management Plans (PUL), as well as Nature Conservation Programs (POP). The volume of harvested timber was diversified. In 2011–2013, it was limited by a decision of the Minister of the Environment from 110,000 m 3 in 2010 to 48,500 m 3 . This contributed to the increase of the European spruce bark beetle gradation, causing the death of spruce stands. By an annex to the Forest Management Plan issued in 2016, the Minister of the Environment increased the amount of the timber harvest. In 2017, it amounted to almost 190,000 m 3 , where 91% of the harvested volume was spruce, but the wood was markedly inferior in technical quality compared to previous years. Such a large increase in harvesting aroused the opposition mainly of environmental organizations and the European Commission. In April 2018, the EU Court of Justice decided that Poland violated EU law by increasing the number of felled trees in Białowieża Forest. After this decision, the Minister of the Environment repealed the earlier decision, the basis for conducting the increased wood harvesting in Białowieża Forest. Changes in the timber harvested in terms of volume, quality, and assortment, are due to the specificity of managing environmentally valuable areas. This relates to the many limitations on commercial forestry, which must take into account the need to protect nature and the legal acts regulating timber harvesting.

Suggested Citation

  • Dariusz Zastocki & Hubert Lachowicz & Jarosław Sadowski & Tadeusz Moskalik, 2018. "Changes in the Assortment and Species Structure of Timber Harvested from the Polish Managed Part of Białowieża Forest," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:9:p:3279-:d:169780
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/9/3279/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/9/3279/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hubert Paluš & Ján Parobek & Rastislav Šulek & Ján Lichý & Jaroslav Šálka, 2018. "Understanding Sustainable Forest Management Certification in Slovakia: Forest Owners’ Perception of Expectations, Benefits and Problems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. So, Hau Wing & Lafortezza, Raffaele, 2022. "Reviewing the impacts of eco-labelling of forest products on different dimensions of sustainability in Europe," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    2. Erika Loučanová & Mikuláš Šupín & Tatiana Čorejová & Katarína Repková-Štofková & Mária Šupínová & Zuzana Štofková & Miriam Olšiaková, 2021. "Sustainability and Branding: An Integrated Perspective of Eco-innovation and Brand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-10, January.
    3. Sajjad Ali & Dake Wang & Talib Hussain & Xiaocong Lu & Mohammad Nurunnabi, 2021. "Forest Resource Management: An Empirical Study in Northern Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Jun-Yen Lee & Ching-Hsing Chang, 2019. "Efforts toward Creating a Sustainable Business Model: An Empirical Investigation of Small-Scale Certified Forestry Firms in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, May.
    5. Zubizarreta, Mikel & Arana-Landín, Germán & Wolff, Sarah & Egiluz, Ziortza, 2023. "Assessing the economic impacts of forest certification in Spain: A longitudinal study," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(PA).
    6. Paluš, Hubert & Marcineková, Lenka & Šálka, Jaroslav, 2024. "Was stakeholder participation in the PEFC revision process successful in Slovakia?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    7. Yingying Zhou & Baodong Cheng & Jianbin Chen, 2022. "Uncovering the Effect of Forest Certification on the Dynamic Evolution of the Global Log Trade Network: A Stochastic Actor-Oriented Model Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-13, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:9:p:3279-:d:169780. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.