IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i9p3115-d166905.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Distributions, Pollution Assessment, and Qualified Source Apportionment of Soil Heavy Metals in a Typical Mineral Mining City in China

Author

Listed:
  • Li Hua

    (College of Resources & Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Xue Yang

    (College of Resources & Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Yajun Liu

    (College of Resources & Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Xiuli Tan

    (College of Resources & Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Yong Yang

    (College of Resources & Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)

Abstract

Daye is a city in China known for its rich mineral resources, with a history of metal mining and smelting that dates back more than 3000 years. To analyze the spatial distribution patterns, ecological risk, and sources of heavy metals (Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Mn, Ni, Pb, and Zn) in soils, 213 topsoil samples were collected in the main urban area of Daye in September 2016. The mean concentrations of Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn were higher than the corresponding background values, with the mean concentration of Cd being almost seven times its background value. Spatially, the high concentrations of Cd, Mn, Pb, and Zn were mainly concentrated in the southeastern part of the region due to nonferrous metal mining and smelting. However, the high concentrations of Co and Cu were concentrated in the central part of the study area, resulted from copper mining and smelting. The data of the geoaccumulation index showed that the contamination levels ranged from no pollution (Co, Cr, Mn, and Ni) to heavy contamination (Cd, Cu, and Pb). Ecological risk assessment showed that Cd posed a high, serious, and even severe ecological risk in 53.78% of the area of Daye. According to the results of the principal component analysis, mineral exploitation and smelting involving a variety of minerals (ES_M), mining exploitation, and smelting of copper ore (ES_C), and natural sources are the three main sources of heavy metals in these soils. Furthermore, the absolute principal component scores showed that 69.21% and 23.17% of the heavy metal concentrations were ascribed to ES_M and ES_C, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Hua & Xue Yang & Yajun Liu & Xiuli Tan & Yong Yang, 2018. "Spatial Distributions, Pollution Assessment, and Qualified Source Apportionment of Soil Heavy Metals in a Typical Mineral Mining City in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:9:p:3115-:d:166905
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/9/3115/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/9/3115/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fuyao Chen & Yongjun Yang & Jiaxin Mi & Run Liu & Huping Hou & Shaoliang Zhang, 2019. "Effects of Vegetation Pattern and Spontaneous Succession on Remediation of Potential Toxic Metal-Polluted Soil in Mine Dumps," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-13, January.
    2. Honggang Zang & Yidan Zhang & Junqin Yao & Huiying Ma, 2022. "Source Analysis of Heavy Metal Pollution Using UNMIX and PMF Models in Soils along the Shuimo River in Urumqi, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Aman Fang & Jihong Dong & Yingli An, 2019. "Distribution Characteristics and Pollution Assessment of Soil Heavy Metals under Different Land-Use Types in Xuzhou City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-12, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:9:p:3115-:d:166905. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.