IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i6p1995-d152348.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Approach to Artificial and Natural Green Walls According to Ecological Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Alperen Meral

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Agriculture, Bingol University, Bingol 12000, Turkey)

  • Nermin Başaran

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Forestry, Duzce University, Duzce 81620, Turkey)

  • Emrah Yalçınalp

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Forestry, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon 61080, Turkey)

  • Ezgi Doğan

    (Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Bingol University, Bingol 12000, Turkey)

  • Mehmet Kıvanç Ak

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Forestry, Duzce University, Duzce 81620, Turkey)

  • Engin Eroğlu

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Forestry, Duzce University, Duzce 81620, Turkey)

Abstract

Together with the rapid industrialization of the world, urbanization is also uncontrollably increasing. Such an increase in urbanization exerts the greatest pressure on natural resources, obligating people to live in intense structural spaces and increasing the need for green spaces in cities. Because of the expensive costs of horizontal surfaces being “green”, urban places are faced with serious green-infrastructure problems. In recent years, alternatives have been searched for to eliminate such deficiencies. These alternatives, such as rain gardens, green walls (GWs), ecological designs, and green roofs, are commonly included in urban landscape designs. Besides rocky or steep-slope natural green walls (NGWs), natural green covers over buildings, walls, and so forth, structural members are also encountered in urban or rural places. On the other hand, artificial green walls (AGWs) have recently been used as a significant component of urban design. Although the AGWs are able to address various functional needs, they have not yet gained the desired popularity because of construction costs, static loads, constructional damages, and maintenance costs. In addition, such sites are largely left to exotic species with limited ecological requirements; these species are far from meeting ecological functions and resistance to extreme conditions. This study was conducted for a benchmarking assessment of artificial and natural green walls (A&NGWs) with a high potential in urban landscape design not only for esthetics, but also for ecological and economical purposes. Plant species, initial establishment, maintenance costs, and some other parameters of selected GWs were assessed. The study was considered as pioneering research for low-cost minimum-maintenance AGWs to be included in urban landscape designs. It was concluded, on the basis of the present findings, that the GW systems established with natural plant species, rock, and other materials already existing in natural landscapes could be constructed at fairly low costs, and such wall systems could have great ecological contributions.

Suggested Citation

  • Alperen Meral & Nermin Başaran & Emrah Yalçınalp & Ezgi Doğan & Mehmet Kıvanç Ak & Engin Eroğlu, 2018. "A Comparative Approach to Artificial and Natural Green Walls According to Ecological Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:6:p:1995-:d:152348
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/6/1995/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/6/1995/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emrah Yalcinalp & Selva Ozveren & Alperen Meral & Muberra Pulatkan & Sefa Akbulut, 2017. "Habitat Effect on Urban Roof Vegetation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-13, October.
    2. Emrah Yalcinalp & Alperen Meral, 2017. "Wall Vegetation Characteristics of Urban and Sub-Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-15, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sonja Knapp & Sebastian Schmauck & Andreas Zehnsdorf, 2019. "Biodiversity Impact of Green Roofs and Constructed Wetlands as Progressive Eco-Technologies in Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-26, October.
    2. Sri Yuliani & Gagoek Hardiman & Erni Setyowati, 2020. "Green-Roof: The Role of Community in the Substitution of Green-Space toward Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:6:p:1995-:d:152348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.