IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i5p1441-d144770.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Liquid-Phase Respiration Activity Assays to Assess Organic Waste Stability: A Comparison of Two Tests

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandros Evangelou

    (Laboratory of Solid and Hazardous Waste Management, Department of Environmental Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, 671 32 Xanthi, Greece)

  • Dimitrios Komilis

    (Laboratory of Solid and Hazardous Waste Management, Department of Environmental Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, 671 32 Xanthi, Greece)

Abstract

The stability of twenty-seven composts and organic substrates (including raw, less stable and stable materials) was assessed using two different liquid phase tests. One of the tests was introduced in 1998 and was based on the calculation of a Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate (SOUR). The newly introduced liquid phase test presented here is simpler to set-up and to perform than the older liquid phase test and is more representative of the composting process due to its longer experimental duration. It is based on the quantification of oxygen consumption in the headspace of a BOD bottle that contains the liquid-solid solution. The results indicate that a marginal correlation does exist between the main indices calculated from both tests. The correlation was slightly stronger for the indices calculated from the raw materials than from the processed ones. The correlation calculated from the processed substrates was statistically insignificant. The SOUR ranged from 1520 to 3650 mg O 2 /kg VS-h for the raw materials and from 110 to 1150 mg O 2 /kg VS-h for the processed materials, respectively. The corresponding stability rate related index (LSRI 24 ) of the new liquid phase test introduced here ranged from 240 to 1180 mg O 2 /dry kg-h for the raw materials and from 64 to 792 mg O 2 /dry kg-h for the processed ones.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandros Evangelou & Dimitrios Komilis, 2018. "Liquid-Phase Respiration Activity Assays to Assess Organic Waste Stability: A Comparison of Two Tests," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:5:p:1441-:d:144770
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1441/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1441/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:5:p:1441-:d:144770. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.