IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i2p401-d130177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable RC Beam-Column Connections with Headed Bars: A Formula for Shear Strength Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Minh-Tung Tran

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam)

  • Quoc-Bao Bui

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam)

  • Bastian Sentosa

    (Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LOCIE, 73000 Chambery, France)

  • Nhat-Tien Nguyen

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam)

  • Trung-Hieu Duong

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam)

  • Olivier Plé

    (Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LOCIE, 73000 Chambery, France)

Abstract

Beam-column joints are critical regions for reinforced concrete (RC) frames subjected to earthquakes. The steel reinforcement is, in general, highly concentrated in these zones. This is why in many cases, headed bars are used. A headed bar is a longitudinal steel reinforcement whose end has a special button added to reduce the bonding length of the steel rebar. This paper establishes a formula predicting the shear strength of exterior RC beam-column connections where the beam longitudinal reinforcements use headed bars. A database was collected, which contained 30 experimental data about the exterior beam-column joints using headed bars and subjected to quasi-static cyclic loading. First, from the collected database, a statistical study was carried out to identify the most influencing parameters on the shear strength of the beam-column joints tested. The three most important parameters were identified and an empirical modified formula was developed based on the formula existing in the standards. The study showed that the results obtained from the modified formula proposed in the present study were closer to the experimental results than that obtained from the formula existing in the standards. Finally, a numerical study was performed on two T-form RC structures and the numerical results were compared with the prediction calculated from the modified formula proposed. For two investigated cases, the proposed formula provided the results in the safety side and the differences with the numerical results were less than 20%. Thus, the proposed formula can be used for a rapid assessment of the shear strength of RC joints using headed bars.

Suggested Citation

  • Minh-Tung Tran & Quoc-Bao Bui & Bastian Sentosa & Nhat-Tien Nguyen & Trung-Hieu Duong & Olivier Plé, 2018. "Sustainable RC Beam-Column Connections with Headed Bars: A Formula for Shear Strength Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-14, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:2:p:401-:d:130177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/2/401/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/2/401/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emmanouil Golias & Adamantis G. Zapris & Violetta K. Kytinou & George I. Kalogeropoulos & Constantin E. Chalioris & Chris G. Karayannis, 2021. "Effectiveness of the Novel Rehabilitation Method of Seismically Damaged RC Joints Using C-FRP Ropes and Comparison with Widely Applied Method Using C-FRP Sheets—Experimental Investigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:2:p:401-:d:130177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.