IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i12p4733-d189913.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Spatial-Temporal Characteristics and Dilemmas of Sustainable Urbanization in China: A New Perspective Based on the Concept of Five-in-One

Author

Listed:
  • Chao Wei

    (School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Zhanqi Wang

    (School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Xi Lan

    (School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Hongwei Zhang

    (School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Mengjiao Fan

    (School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

Abstract

A large amount of ink has been spilled to paint the picture of China’s urbanization. However, more research might be done on the connotation of sustainable urbanization in China. On the basis of a literature review, this study is the first to propose the perspective of evaluating the sustainability of urbanization from the five dimensions of urbanization: economic, political, cultural, social, and ecological. Based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method and entropy method, a five-dimensional indicator system was established to evaluate the urbanization quality of 31 provincial regions in China during 2005–2015. Then, the coupling coordination degree model was used to calculate the coupling coordination degree of the five dimensions for each region. Furthermore, Moran’s I index and a local indicators of spatial association (LISA) cluster map were used to measure and describe the spatial disparity. Finally, a factor identification model was used to recognize the weaknesses of each region. This study leads to four major findings. (1) In 2015, only ecological urbanization had a high-quality and balanced development, while the development of cultural urbanization was inadequate and regionally unbalanced. Economic, ecological, and cultural dimensions had a significantly positive global spatial autocorrelation. The local spatial autocorrelation varies with dimension. (2) The quality of comprehensive urbanization increased during 2005–2015, while the regional disparity experienced a reduction. A positive global spatial autocorrelation was shown during 2005–2015. The High-High type in the eastern coastal areas centralized over time, while the Low-Low type in the western areas experienced a decline, and the Low-High type was stabilized in the central areas. Only Chongqing was in the High-Low type in 2015. (3) The increase of coupling coordination degree and decrease of coefficient of variation indicated a favorable situation. The coupling coordination degree also had a positive global spatial autocorrelation during 2005–2015. Both the High-High and Low-Low types experienced an obvious shrink and displacement. The Low-High type expanded and centralized in the central areas, while the High–Low type was in Guangdong in 2005, and in Chongqing in 2015. (4) The highest obstacle degrees of each region were all within the cultural dimension, while the ecological dimension caused the least resistance. The lack of innovation had become the biggest barrier in most regions. Based on the above conclusions, this paper concludes with recommendations for policy makers to advance sustainable urbanization in China. Meanwhile, this study can provide lessons and suggestions for other developing countries in the world.

Suggested Citation

  • Chao Wei & Zhanqi Wang & Xi Lan & Hongwei Zhang & Mengjiao Fan, 2018. "The Spatial-Temporal Characteristics and Dilemmas of Sustainable Urbanization in China: A New Perspective Based on the Concept of Five-in-One," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-28, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4733-:d:189913
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4733/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4733/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sato, Yasuhiro & Zenou, Yves, 2015. "How urbanization affect employment and social interactions," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 131-155.
    2. Yitian Ren & Heng Li & Liyin Shen & Yu Zhang & Yang Chen & Jinhuan Wang, 2018. "What Is the Efficiency of Fast Urbanization? A China Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-26, September.
    3. Zhao, Jingjing & Chai, Lihe, 2015. "A novel approach for urbanization level evaluation based on information entropy principle: A case of Beijing," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 430(C), pages 114-125.
    4. Yanjing Zhang & Zhengguo Su & Guan Li & Yuefei Zhuo & Zhongguo Xu, 2018. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution of Sustainable Urbanization Development: A Perspective of the Coupling Coordination Development Based on Population, Industry, and Built-Up Land Spatial Agglomeration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, May.
    5. Luisito Bertinelli & Eric Strobl, 2007. "Urbanisation, Urban Concentration and Economic Development," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(13), pages 2499-2510, December.
    6. Turner, Matthew A., 2007. "A simple theory of smart growth and sprawl," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 21-44, January.
    7. William P. Anderson & Pavlos S. Kanaroglou & Eric J. Miller, 1996. "Urban Form, Energy and the Environment: A Review of Issues, Evidence and Policy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 33(1), pages 7-35, February.
    8. Ya Ping Wang & Yanglin Wang & Jiansheng Wu, 2009. "Urbanization and Informal Development in China: Urban Villages in Shenzhen," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 957-973, December.
    9. Alan Harding & Stuart Wilks-Heeg & Mary Hutchins, 2000. "Business, Government and the Business of Urban Governance," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(5-6), pages 975-994, May.
    10. Xiaobin Zhao & Li Zhang, 1995. "Urban Performance and the Control of Urban Size in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 32(4-5), pages 813-846, May.
    11. Denise Young & Honghai Deng, 1998. "Urbanisation, Agriculture and Industrialisation in China, 1952-91," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 35(9), pages 1439-1455, August.
    12. Jing Li & Hong Fang & Siran Fang & Sultana Easmin Siddika, 2018. "Investigation of the Relationship among University–Research Institute–Industry Innovations Using a Coupling Coordination Degree Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, June.
    13. Wang, Shaojian & Li, Guangdong & Fang, Chuanglin, 2018. "Urbanization, economic growth, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: Empirical evidence from countries with different income levels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2144-2159.
    14. Wang, Ran & Cheng, Jinhua & Zhu, Yali & Lu, Peixin, 2017. "Evaluation on the coupling coordination of resources and environment carrying capacity in Chinese mining economic zones," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 20-25.
    15. David Satterthwaite, 1997. "Sustainable Cities or Cities that Contribute to Sustainable Development?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 34(10), pages 1667-1691, October.
    16. O.J. Kuik & A.J. Gilbert, 1999. "Indicators of Sustainable Development," Chapters, in: Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh (ed.), Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics, chapter 49, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Cong Xu & Shixin Wang & Yi Zhou & Litao Wang & Wenliang Liu, 2016. "A Comprehensive Quantitative Evaluation of New Sustainable Urbanization Level in 20 Chinese Urban Agglomerations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-19, January.
    18. Ananda, Jayanath & Herath, Gamini, 2003. "The use of Analytic Hierarchy Process to incorporate stakeholder preferences into regional forest planning," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 13-26, January.
    19. Fulong Wu, 2000. "The Global and Local Dimensions of Place-making: Remaking Shanghai as a World City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(8), pages 1359-1377, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Beibei Hu & Airong Xu & Xianlei Dong, 2022. "Evaluating the Comprehensive Development Level and Coordinated Relationships of Urban Multimodal Transportation: A Case Study of China’s Major Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-28, November.
    2. Qian Chen & Yuzhe Bi & Jiangfeng Li, 2021. "Spatial Disparity and Influencing Factors of Coupling Coordination Development of Economy–Environment–Tourism–Traffic: A Case Study in the Middle Reaches of Yangtze River Urban Agglomerations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Chao Wei & Qiaowen Lin & Li Yu & Hongwei Zhang & Sheng Ye & Di Zhang, 2021. "Research on Sustainable Land Use Based on Production–Living–Ecological Function: A Case Study of Hubei Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    4. Adib Ahmad Kurnia & Ernan Rustiadi & Akhmad Fauzi & Andrea Emma Pravitasari & Izuru Saizen & Jan Ženka, 2022. "Understanding Industrial Land Development on Rural-Urban Land Transformation of Jakarta Megacity’s Outer Suburb," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Xuanxuan Xia & Kexin Lin & Yang Ding & Xianlei Dong & Huijun Sun & Beibei Hu, 2020. "Research on the Coupling Coordination Relationships between Urban Function Mixing Degree and Urbanization Development Level Based on Information Entropy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-24, December.
    6. Chenyu Lu & Jiaqi Yang & Hengji Li & Shulei Jin & Min Pang & Chengpeng Lu, 2019. "Research on the Spatial–Temporal Synthetic Measurement of the Coordinated Development of Population-Economy-Society-Resource-Environment (PESRE) Systems in China Based on Geographic Information System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, May.
    7. Dong Xu & Guolin Hou, 2019. "The Spatiotemporal Coupling Characteristics of Regional Urbanization and Its Influencing Factors: Taking the Yangtze River Delta as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, February.
    8. Xianlei Dong & Shan Gao & Airong Xu & Zhikun Luo & Beibei Hu, 2022. "Research on Tourism Carrying Capacity and the Coupling Coordination Relationships between Its Influencing Factors: A Case Study of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-28, November.
    9. Yuqing Geng & Han Zhang, 2021. "Coordinated Interactions of Sustainable Urbanization Dimensions: Case Study in Hunan, China," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, April.
    10. Chao Wei & Zuo Zhang & Sheng Ye & Mengxi Hong & Wenwen Wang, 2021. "Spatial-Temporal Divergence and Driving Mechanisms of Urban-Rural Sustainable Development: An Empirical Study Based on Provincial Panel Data in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hailiang Ma & Nan-Ting Chou & Lei Wang, 2016. "Dynamic Coupling Analysis of Urbanization and Water Resource Utilization Systems in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Yanjing Zhang & Zhengguo Su & Guan Li & Yuefei Zhuo & Zhongguo Xu, 2018. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution of Sustainable Urbanization Development: A Perspective of the Coupling Coordination Development Based on Population, Industry, and Built-Up Land Spatial Agglomeration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Lin Ding & Zhenfeng Shao & Hanchao Zhang & Cong Xu & Dewen Wu, 2016. "A Comprehensive Evaluation of Urban Sustainable Development in China Based on the TOPSIS-Entropy Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-23, August.
    4. Dong Xu & Guolin Hou, 2019. "The Spatiotemporal Coupling Characteristics of Regional Urbanization and Its Influencing Factors: Taking the Yangtze River Delta as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, February.
    5. Zhao, Simon Xiaobin & Guo, Natasha Shu & Li, Chun Lok Kris & Smith, Christopher, 2017. "Megacities, the World’s Largest Cities Unleashed: Major Trends and Dynamics in Contemporary Global Urban Development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 257-289.
    6. Jing Bian & Hong Ren & Ping Liu & Yu Zhang, 2018. "Sustainable Urbanization Performance Evaluation Based on “Origin” and “Modernization” Perspectives: A Case Study of Chongqing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-17, August.
    7. Fei Tao & Guoan Tang & Yihao Wu & Tong Zhou, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity and Driving Mechanism of Co-Ordinated Urban Development: A Case Study of the Central Area of the Yangtze River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, April.
    8. Emanuele Amodio & Michele Battisti & Antonio Francesco Gravina & Andrea Mario Lavezzi & Giuseppe Maggio, 2023. "School‐age vaccination, school openings and Covid‐19 diffusion," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(5), pages 1084-1100, May.
    9. Pan, Wenjian & Du, Juan, 2021. "Towards sustainable urban transition: A critical review of strategies and policies of urban village renewal in Shenzhen, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    10. Namahoro, J.P. & Wu, Q. & Su, H., 2023. "Wind energy, industrial-economic development and CO2 emissions nexus: Do droughts matter?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    11. Marcus Adolphson, 2010. "Kernel Densities and Mixed Functionality in a Multicentred Urban Region," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 37(3), pages 550-566, June.
    12. Dorota Ciołek & Anna Golejewska & Adriana Zabłocka‐Abi Yaghi, 2022. "Innovation drivers in regions. Does urbanization matter?," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(4), pages 1933-1960, December.
    13. Changchun Feng & Hao Zhang & Liang Xiao & Yongpei Guo, 2022. "Land Use Change and Its Driving Factors in the Rural–Urban Fringe of Beijing: A Production–Living–Ecological Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, February.
    14. Paul L. G. Vlek & Asia Khamzina & Hossein Azadi & Anik Bhaduri & Luna Bharati & Ademola Braimoh & Christopher Martius & Terry Sunderland & Fatemeh Taheri, 2017. "Trade-Offs in Multi-Purpose Land Use under Land Degradation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, November.
    15. Huilian Han & Hui Li, 2020. "Coupling Coordination Evaluation between Population and Land Urbanization in Ha-Chang Urban Agglomeration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, January.
    16. Dong, Kangyin & Dong, Xiucheng & Jiang, Qingzhe & Zhao, Jun, 2021. "Assessing energy resilience and its greenhouse effect: A global perspective," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    17. Roberto Ganau & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2022. "Does urban concentration matter for changes in country economic performance?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(6), pages 1275-1299, May.
    18. Tuan Nguyen Tran, 2023. "A comparative study of urban land use efficiency of the cities of Hai Phong and Can Tho, Vietnam," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 11(3), pages 43-53, September.
    19. Yan Xin & Dongchuan Wang & Lihui Zhang & Yingyi Ma & Xing Chen & Haiqing Wang & Hongyi Wang & Kangjian Wang & Hui Long & Hua Chai & Jianshe Gao, 2022. "Cooperative analysis of infrastructure perfection and residents’ living standards in poverty-stricken counties in Qinghai Province," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 3687-3703, March.
    20. Zhen Yang & Jun Lei & Jian-Gang Li, 2019. "Identifying the Determinants of Urbanization in Prefecture-Level Cities in China: A Quantitative Analysis Based on Spatial Production Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4733-:d:189913. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.