IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i10p3769-d176679.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exposing Sustainable Mortars with Nanosilica, Zinc Stearate, and Ethyl Silicate Coating to Sulfuric Acid Attack

Author

Listed:
  • Victoria Eugenia García-Vera

    (Departamento de Arquitectura y Tecnología de la Edificación, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, 30203 Murcia, Spain)

  • Antonio José Tenza-Abril

    (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain)

  • Marcos Lanzón

    (Departamento de Arquitectura y Tecnología de la Edificación, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, 30203 Murcia, Spain)

  • José Miguel Saval

    (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain)

Abstract

Obtaining durable materials that lengthen the service life of constructions and thereby contribute to sustainability requires research into products that improve the durability of cementitious materials under aggressive conditions. This paper studies the effects of sulfuric acid exposure on four mortar types (control mortar, mortar with nanosilica, mortar with zinc stearate, and mortar with an ethyl silicate coating), and evaluates which of them have better performance against the acid attack. After 28 days of curing, the samples were exposed to a sulfuric acid attack by immersing them in a 3% w / w of H 2 SO 4 solution. Physical changes (mass loss, ultrasonic pulse velocity, open porosity, and water absorption), and mechanical changes (compressive strength) were determined after the sulfuric acid exposure. A scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to characterize the morphology of the surface mortars after the exposure. The control mortar had the highest compressive strength after the acid attack, although of the four types, the zinc stearate mortar showed the lowest percentage of strength loss. The zinc stearate mortar had the lowest mass loss after the acid exposure; moreover, it had the lowest capillary water absorption coefficient (demonstrating its hydrophobic effect) both in a non-aggressive environment and acid attack.

Suggested Citation

  • Victoria Eugenia García-Vera & Antonio José Tenza-Abril & Marcos Lanzón & José Miguel Saval, 2018. "Exposing Sustainable Mortars with Nanosilica, Zinc Stearate, and Ethyl Silicate Coating to Sulfuric Acid Attack," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:10:p:3769-:d:176679
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/10/3769/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/10/3769/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. José Marcos Ortega & María Dolores Esteban & Mark Williams & Isidro Sánchez & Miguel Ángel Climent, 2018. "Short-Term Performance of Sustainable Silica Fume Mortars Exposed to Sulfate Attack," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-14, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daming Luo & Yan Wang & Shaohui Zhang & Ditao Niu, 2020. "Application of Fuzzy and Rough Sets to Environmental Zonation for Concrete Durability: A Case Study of Shaanxi Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Murat Türköz & Seyfettin Umut Umu & Ogan Öztürk, 2021. "Effect of Silica Fume as a Waste Material for Sustainable Environment on the Stabilization and Dynamic Behavior of Dispersive Soil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:10:p:3769-:d:176679. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.