IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i10p3535-d173248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban Entertainment Center (UEC) as a Redevelopment Strategy for Large-Scale Post-Industrial Sites in Seoul: Between Public Policy and Privatization of Planning

Author

Listed:
  • Il Lee

    (Graduate Program in Urban Design at the College of Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea)

  • Soe Won Hwang

    (Environmental Planning Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea)

Abstract

The decline of inner-city manufacturing industries is a global phenomenon, leaving behind vacant land and brownfield sites in cities. These post-industrial areas with their negative images of dereliction and obsolete urban environments have prompted many cities to implement various redevelopment strategies, among which is the concept of the Urban Entertainment Center (UEC), which combines shopping, recreation, and entertainment, with various public spaces. This study attempts to understand the changes that have been triggered by the revitalization strategy of UEC development in large-scale post-industrial sites in Seoul. Here, Special Planning District (SPD) regulation has been adopted to induce creative and long-term urban developments; however, this has been limited to private high-rise residential buildings. This paper examines two UEC development cases applied along with the SPD in semi-industrial areas for their achievements that differ from former implementations. Our analysis reveals several positive aspects: it provides a sustainable urban infrastructure for the region, overcomes the limitations of the SPD regulation practice, and establishes improved urban environment and design quality oriented toward public interest. The “privatization of planning” has become an issue in redevelopment projects. However, the two UEC precedents that are discussed imply that building cooperative public–private partnerships through a reciprocal process will secure more public benefit overall.

Suggested Citation

  • Il Lee & Soe Won Hwang, 2018. "Urban Entertainment Center (UEC) as a Redevelopment Strategy for Large-Scale Post-Industrial Sites in Seoul: Between Public Policy and Privatization of Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:10:p:3535-:d:173248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/10/3535/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/10/3535/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gavin Shatkin, 2008. "The City and the Bottom Line: Urban Megaprojects and the Privatization of Planning in Southeast Asia," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(2), pages 383-401, February.
    2. Calvin Jones, 2001. "A Level Playing Field? Sports Stadium Infrastructure and Urban Development in the United Kingdom," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 33(5), pages 845-861, May.
    3. Kris Wernstedt & Peter Meyer & Anna Alberini & Lauren Heberle, 2006. "Incentives for private residential brownfields development in US urban areas," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(1), pages 101-119.
    4. Peter Hall, 2000. "Creative Cities and Economic Development," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(4), pages 639-649, April.
    5. K Bassett, 1993. "Urban Cultural Strategies and Urban Regeneration: A Case Study and Critique," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 25(12), pages 1773-1788, December.
    6. Richard Child Hill & June Woo Kim, 2000. "Global Cities and Developmental States: New York, Tokyo and Seoul," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(12), pages 2167-2195, November.
    7. Chiara Garau & Paola Zamperlin & Ginevra Balletto, 2016. "Reconsidering the Geddesian Concepts of Community and Space through the Paradigm of Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-16, September.
    8. Hans Mommaas, 2004. "Cultural Clusters and the Post-industrial City: Towards the Remapping of Urban Cultural Policy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(3), pages 507-532, March.
    9. Eva Kiss, 2002. "Restructuring in the Industrial Areas of Budapest in the Period of Transition," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(1), pages 69-84, January.
    10. Phil Hubbard, 1996. "Urban Design and City Regeneration: Social Representations of Entrepreneurial Landscapes," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 33(8), pages 1441-1461, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sungkyun Lee, 2022. "A Study on the Changing Architectural Properties of Mixed-Use Commercial Complexes in Seoul, Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marina van Geenhuizen & Peter Nijkamp (ed.), 2012. "Creative Knowledge Cities," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14402.
    2. Ebru KERİMOĞLU & Büşra GÜVEN-GÜNEY, 2018. "İstanbul’da Yaratıcı İşgücünün Eğitimi ve Endüstri Pratikleri Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society, issue 26(37).
    3. Yawei Chen, 2012. "Making Shanghai a Creative City: Exploring the Creative Cluster Strategy from a Chinese Perspective," Chapters, in: Marina van Geenhuizen & Peter Nijkamp (ed.), Creative Knowledge Cities, chapter 17, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Giuseppe Attanasi & Ylenia Curci & Patrick Llerena & Maria del Pino Ramos-Sosa & Adriana Carolina Pinate & Giulia Urso, 2019. "Looking at Creativity from East to West: Risk Taking and Intrinsic Motivation in Socially and Culturally Diverse Countries," Working Papers of BETA 2019-38, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    5. Hall, Stephen & Foxon, Timothy J., 2014. "Values in the Smart Grid: The co-evolving political economy of smart distribution," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 600-609.
    6. HaeRan Shin & Quentin Stevens, 2013. "How Culture and Economy Meet in South Korea: The Politics of Cultural Economy in Culture-led Urban Regeneration," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 1707-1723, September.
    7. Seungil Yum, 2019. "The interaction between knowledge-intensive business services and urban economy," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 63(1), pages 53-83, August.
    8. Ferdinand, Nicole & Williams, Nigel L., 2013. "International festivals as experience production systems," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 202-210.
    9. Ye Seul Choi & Up Lim, 2015. "Effects of Regional Creative Milieu on Interregional Migration of the Highly Educated in Korea: Evidence from Hierarchical Cross-Classified Linear Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Nathan, Max, 2022. "Does light touch cluster policy work? Evaluating the tech city programme," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(9).
    11. Peter Mayerhofer & Oliver Fritz & Dieter Pennerstorfer, 2010. "Dritter Bericht zur internationalen Wettbewerbsfähigkeit Wiens," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 42430, March.
    12. Dominc Power & (ed.), "undated". "Behind The Music Profiting from Sound: A Systems Approach to the Dynamics of the Nordic Music Industry," STEP Report series 200304, The STEP Group, Studies in technology, innovation and economic policy.
    13. Rik Wenting & Oedzge Atzema & Koen Frenken, 2008. "Urban Amenities or Agglomeration Economies? Locational Behaviour and Entrepreneurial Success of Dutch Fashion Designers," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 0803, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jan 2008.
    14. Tinatin Medzmariashvili, 2018. "State Procurement Electronic System Efficiency in Georgia," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 4, ejes_v4_i.
    15. Chris Hamnett, 2011. "Urban Social Polarization," Chapters, in: Ben Derudder & Michael Hoyler & Peter J. Taylor & Frank Witlox (ed.), International Handbook of Globalization and World Cities, chapter 32, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Nurit Alfasi & Talia Margalit, 2014. "The challenge of regulating private planning initiatives," Chapters, in: David Emanuel Andersson & Stefano Moroni (ed.), Cities and Private Planning, chapter 13, pages 269-294, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Helene Martin‐Brelot & Michel Grossetti & Denis Eckert & Olga Gritsai & Zoltán Kovács, 2010. "The Spatial Mobility of the ‘Creative Class’: A European Perspective," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 854-870, December.
    18. Arauzo Carod, Josep Maria & Coll Martínez, Eva & Turcu, Camelia, 2018. "Where New Creative Industries Locate? Evidence from French Departments," Working Papers 2072/307042, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
    19. Pier Luigi Sacco & Guido Ferilli & Giorgio Tavano Blessi & Massimiliano Nuccio, 2013. "Culture as an Engine of Local Development Processes: System-Wide Cultural Districts II: Prototype Cases," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 571-588, December.
    20. Jan Suchacek, 2019. "The Benefit of Failure: On the Development of Ostrava’s Culture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:10:p:3535-:d:173248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.