IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v13y2025i4p67-d1625364.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ESG Controversies and Firm Investment Efficiency: Impact and Mechanism Examination

Author

Listed:
  • Shijin Ma

    (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Tao Ma

    (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
    Shanghai Key Laboratory of Policy Simulation and Assessment for Ecology and Environment Governance, Shanghai 200433, China)

Abstract

In the context of increasingly severe global climate change, both companies and investors are placing greater emphasis on investment philosophies centered around environmental protection, social responsibility, and corporate governance (ESG). This paper, based on data from 847 Chinese A-share listed companies over the period 2007–2022, employs a two-way fixed effects model to investigate the relationship between ESG controversies and firm investment efficiency. The results indicate that ESG controversies significantly reduce overall firm investment efficiency. Further analysis reveals that ESG controversies affect investment efficiency by exacerbating agency costs and reducing audit quality. Meanwhile, financing constraints and robust internal control quality mitigate these negative effects. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the impact is more pronounced for firms with higher pollution levels, non-state-owned enterprises, those with higher analyst coverage, and firms with lower levels of digitalization. The findings have significant implications for encouraging companies to fulfill their social responsibilities and promote high-quality economic development.

Suggested Citation

  • Shijin Ma & Tao Ma, 2025. "ESG Controversies and Firm Investment Efficiency: Impact and Mechanism Examination," Risks, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:67-:d:1625364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/13/4/67/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/13/4/67/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:67-:d:1625364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.