Author
Listed:
- Lazar A. Badalov
(Department of Finance and Credit of the Faculty of Economics, RUDN University (Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia), 117198 Moscow, Russia)
- Daria V. Lebedeva
(Department of Finance and Credit of the Faculty of Economics, RUDN University (Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia), 117198 Moscow, Russia)
- Natalia V. Bondarchuk
(Department of Digital Economy Security and Risk Management, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education, Gubkin Russian State University of Oil and Gas (National Research University), 119991 Moscow, Russia)
- Daria A. Dinets
(Department of Finance and Credit of the Faculty of Economics, RUDN University (Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia), 117198 Moscow, Russia)
Abstract
This article examines the relationship between implementing sustainable development measures and financial risk in the context of global companies and the recycling economy. This study uses statistics from Forbes, TIME, and Statista on 50 global companies that actively embrace sustainable development and recycling-economy practices across various industries. As a result, we have compiled a Structural Equation Model (SEM), with the help of which we established that growth in the activity of their implementing the measures of sustainable development and the recycling economy by each 1 point leads to a reduction in the risk of a shortfall in global companies’ profit by USD 0.0741 billion and the risk of ousting global companies from the market by USD 1.8374 billion. It has also been revealed that a reduction in the risk of the shortfall in profit by each USD 1 billion is accompanied by an increase in the activity of global companies’ implementing the measures of sustainable development and the recycling economy by 0.3433 points, and a reduction in the risk of market displacement by each USD 1 billion is accompanied by a growth in this activity by 0.0073 points. The theoretical novelty of the research consists of substantiating the differences in the consequences of the development of the recycling economy for financial risks of companies from different sectors. Practical implications of the proposed recommendations for companies in different industries are that the authors’ recommendations for the development of the recycling economy will allow for systemic reduction in financial risks in the sectors “Automotive Industry & Suppliers”, “Banking, Insurance & Financial Services”, “Chemicals, Drugs & Biotechnology”, and “Retail, Wholesale & Consumer Goods”. We have also revealed the threat of growth of all financial risks in the course of the development of the recycling economy in the sphere “Transportation, Logistics & Aviation”. In “Electronics, Hardware & Equipment” and “Manufacturing & Industrial Production”, the implications are differentiated among financial risks, which require flexibility and care during the development of the recycling economy. We find that global companies’ implementation of sustainable development measures, recycling economy practices, and financial risks are mutually dependent organizational phenomena. Moreover, the risk to profits and market displacement manifest differently among global industries. Our conclusions support expediency in implementing sustainable development and recycling-economy measures to reduce the financial risks to global companies. Further, we propose practical recommendations for companies from different sectors of the world economy.
Suggested Citation
Lazar A. Badalov & Daria V. Lebedeva & Natalia V. Bondarchuk & Daria A. Dinets, 2025.
"Financial Risk Management of 50 Global Companies Using SEM: Insights from Sustainable Development and the Recycling Economy,"
Risks, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-26, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:47-:d:1603341
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:47-:d:1603341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.