IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v11y2023i2p33-d1060045.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Sharing, SMEs’ Financial Strategy, and Lending Guarantee Technology

Author

Listed:
  • Karima Saci

    (Banking and Finance Department, Dar Al-Hekma University, Jeddah 22246-4872, Saudi Arabia)

  • Walid Mansour

    (Saudi Central Bank, P.O. Box 2992, Riyadh 11169, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Several governments use the Credit Guarantee Schemes to ease SMEs’ access to funding and support their growth and survival. This paper suggests a lending guarantee technology based on risk sharing through a de facto shareholding agreement to cover potential losses and reduce the premature default risk. The simulation of a typical entrepreneurial experiment shows that the key SMEs dynamics (value creation, profitability, risk, leverage, and equity multiplier, among others) and other related financial additionality and sustainability indicators are substantially improved. The ideal financial strategy for the SMEs’ entrepreneurs is to keep lower levels of the equity multiplier to transmit positive signals to the market, which improves the business prospects and related creditworthiness. The results indicate that risk sharing alleviates the financiers’ reluctance to increase the SMEs funding and improve their risk management systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Karima Saci & Walid Mansour, 2023. "Risk Sharing, SMEs’ Financial Strategy, and Lending Guarantee Technology," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-23, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:11:y:2023:i:2:p:33-:d:1060045
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/11/2/33/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/11/2/33/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jae Kang & Almas Heshmati, 2008. "Effect of credit guarantee policy on survival and performance of SMEs in Republic of Korea," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 445-462, December.
    2. R. Glenn Hubbard, 1998. "Capital-Market Imperfections and Investment," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 36(1), pages 193-225, March.
    3. Mansour, Walid, 2014. "Information asymmetry and financing constraints in GCC," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 11(C), pages 19-29.
    4. Gayané Hovakimian, 2009. "Determinants of Investment Cash Flow Sensitivity," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 38(1), pages 161-183, March.
    5. Mansour, Walid, 2019. "Is the investment-cash flow sensitivity divergent when information is asymmetrically distributed?," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 1-1.
    6. Armen Hovakimian & Gayané Hovakimian, 2009. "Cash Flow Sensitivity of Investment," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 15(1), pages 47-65, January.
    7. Arping, Stefan & Lóránth, Gyöngyi & Morrison, Alan D., 2010. "Public initiatives to support entrepreneurs: Credit guarantees versus co-funding," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 26-35, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xin Qu & Majella Percy & Fang Hu & Jenny Stewart, 2022. "Can CEO equity‐based compensation limit investment‐related agency problems?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(2), pages 2579-2614, June.
    2. Sai Ding & Alessandra Guariglia & John Knight & Junhong Yang, 2021. "Negative Investment in China: Financing Constraints and Restructuring versus Growth," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 69(4), pages 1411-1449.
    3. González, Andrés & Teräsvirta, Timo & van Dijk, Dick & Yang, Yukai, 2005. "Panel Smooth Transition Regression Models," SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance 604, Stockholm School of Economics, revised 11 Oct 2017.
    4. Ding, Sai & Guariglia, Alessandra & Knight, John, 2013. "Investment and financing constraints in China: Does working capital management make a difference?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 1490-1507.
    5. Guariglia, Alessandra & Liu, Xiaoxuan & Song, Lina, 2011. "Internal finance and growth: Microeconometric evidence on Chinese firms," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 79-94, September.
    6. Vijayakumaran, Ratnam, 2021. "Impact of managerial ownership on investment and liquidity constraints: Evidence from Chinese listed companies," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    7. Bertoni, Fabio & Croce, Annalisa & Guerini, Massimiliano, 2015. "Venture capital and the investment curve of young high-tech companies," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 159-176.
    8. Ali, Mazhar, 2015. "Impact of Operating Cash Flows on Capital Spending and Dividends," MPRA Paper 116415, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 19 Oct 2022.
    9. Firth, Michael & Malatesta, Paul H. & Xin, Qingquan & Xu, Liping, 2012. "Corporate investment, government control, and financing channels: Evidence from China's Listed Companies," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 433-450.
    10. Ding, Sai & Kim, Minjoo & Zhang, Xiao, 2018. "Do firms care about investment opportunities? Evidence from China," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 214-237.
    11. Chune Young Chung & Changhwan Choi & Amirhossein Fard, 2024. "Self‐serving attribution and managerial investment decision," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 76(3), pages 749-772, July.
    12. Parul Bhardwaj & Abhishek Kumar, 2019. "Determinants of firm-level investment in India: Does size matter?," Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai Working Papers 2019-016, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.
    13. Mansour, Walid, 2014. "Information asymmetry and financing constraints in GCC," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 11(C), pages 19-29.
    14. repec:aly:journl:202052 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Alfonsina Iona & Leone Leonida, 2018. "Sample separation and the sensitivity of investment to cash flow: Is the monotonicity condition empirically satisfied?," Working Papers 862, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    16. Emmanuel Adu‐Ameyaw & Albert Danso & Moshfique Uddin & Samuel Acheampong, 2024. "Investment‐cash flow sensitivity: Evidence from investment in identifiable intangible and tangible assets activities," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 1179-1204, April.
    17. Vikash Gautam & Rajendra R. Vaidya, 2018. "Evidence on the determinants of investment-cash flow sensitivity," Indian Economic Review, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 229-244, December.
    18. Gochoco-Bautista, Maria Socorro & Sotocinal, Noli R. & Wang, Jianxin, 2014. "Corporate Investments in Asian Markets: Financial Conditions, Financial Development, and Financial Constraints," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 63-78.
    19. Francis, Bill & Hasan, Iftekhar & Song, Liang & Waisman, Maya, 2013. "Corporate governance and investment-cash flow sensitivity: Evidence from emerging markets," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 15(C), pages 57-71.
    20. Schürg, Carolin V. & Bannier, Christina Evelies, 2015. "Corporate investment, debt and liquidity choices in the light of financial constraints and hedging needs," VfS Annual Conference 2015 (Muenster): Economic Development - Theory and Policy 114561, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    21. Panagiotidis, Theodore & Printzis, Panagiotis, 2020. "What is the investment loss due to uncertainty?," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:11:y:2023:i:2:p:33-:d:1060045. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.