IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v11y2023i12p220-d1301234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bidual Representation of Expectiles

Author

Listed:
  • Alejandro Balbás

    (Department of Business Administration, University Carlos III of Madrid, C/Madrid, 126, 28903 Getafe, Madrid, Spain)

  • Beatriz Balbás

    (Department of Economics and Business Administration, University of Alcalá, Pl. de la Victoria, 2, 28802 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain)

  • Raquel Balbás

    (Department of Financial and Actuarial Economics and Statistics, University Complutense of Madrid, Somosaguas, 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain)

  • Jean-Philippe Charron

    (Department of Finance and Commercial Research, Autonomous University of Madrid, C/Francisco Tomás y Valiente, 5, 28049 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

Downside risk measures play a very interesting role in risk management problems. In particular, the value at risk (VaR) and the conditional value at risk (CVaR) have become very important instruments to address problems such as risk optimization, capital requirements, portfolio selection, pricing and hedging issues, risk transference, risk sharing, etc. In contrast, expectile risk measures are not as widely used, even though they are both coherent and elicitable. This paper addresses the bidual representation of expectiles in order to prove further important properties of these risk measures. Indeed, the bidual representation of expectiles enables us to estimate and optimize them by linear programming methods, deal with optimization problems involving expectile-linked constraints, relate expectiles with VaR and CVaR by means of both equalities and inequalities, give VaR and CVaR hyperbolic upper bounds beyond the level of confidence, and analyze whether co-monotonic additivity holds for expectiles. Illustrative applications are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Alejandro Balbás & Beatriz Balbás & Raquel Balbás & Jean-Philippe Charron, 2023. "Bidual Representation of Expectiles," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:11:y:2023:i:12:p:220-:d:1301234
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/11/12/220/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/11/12/220/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Balbás, Alejandro & Balbás, Beatriz & Balbás, Raquel & Heras, Antonio, 2022. "Risk transference constraints in optimal reinsurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 27-40.
    2. Lejeune, Miguel A. & Shen, Siqian, 2016. "Multi-objective probabilistically constrained programs with variable risk: Models for multi-portfolio financial optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(2), pages 522-539.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alois Pichler, 2024. "Higher order measures of risk and stochastic dominance," Papers 2402.15387, arXiv.org.
    2. Alois Pichler, 2024. "Connection between higher order measures of risk and stochastic dominance," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 1-28, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boonen, Tim J. & Ghossoub, Mario, 2023. "Bowley vs. Pareto optima in reinsurance contracting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(1), pages 382-391.
    2. Lejeune, Miguel & Lozin, Vadim & Lozina, Irina & Ragab, Ahmed & Yacout, Soumaya, 2019. "Recent advances in the theory and practice of Logical Analysis of Data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(1), pages 1-15.
    3. Ki Taek Park & Hyejeong Yang & So Young Sohn, 2022. "Recommendation of investment portfolio for peer-to-peer lending with additional consideration of bidding period," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 1083-1105, August.
    4. Miguel A. Lejeune & Janne Kettunen, 2018. "A fractional stochastic integer programming problem for reliability-to-stability ratio in forest harvesting," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 583-597, October.
    5. Zheng, Xiaojin & Wu, Baiyi & Cui, Xueting, 2017. "Cell-and-bound algorithm for chance constrained programs with discrete distributions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(2), pages 421-431.
    6. Nilay Noyan & Gábor Rudolf & Miguel Lejeune, 2022. "Distributionally Robust Optimization Under a Decision-Dependent Ambiguity Set with Applications to Machine Scheduling and Humanitarian Logistics," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 729-751, March.
    7. Qian Xiong & Zuoxiang Peng & Saralees Nadarajah, 2023. "Optimal Reinsurance under the Linear Combination of Risk Measures in the Presence of Reinsurance Loss Limit," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-26, July.
    8. Marla, Lavanya & Rikun, Alexander & Stauffer, Gautier & Pratsini, Eleni, 2020. "Robust modeling and planning: Insights from three industrial applications," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    9. Zhu, Michael B. & Ghossoub, Mario & Boonen, Tim J., 2023. "Equilibria and efficiency in a reinsurance market," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 24-49.
    10. repec:cte:idrepe:24017 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Yiling Zhang & Jin Dong, 2022. "Building Load Control Using Distributionally Robust Chance-Constrained Programs with Right-Hand Side Uncertainty and the Risk-Adjustable Variants," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 1531-1547, May.
    12. Horng, Shih-Cheng & Lin, Shieh-Shing, 2019. "Bat algorithm assisted by ordinal optimization for solving discrete probabilistic bicriteria optimization problems," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 346-364.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:11:y:2023:i:12:p:220-:d:1301234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.