IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v10y2022i9p177-d908271.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Mechanism of Budget Management as an Element of Risk Control in Regulatory Authorities

Author

Listed:
  • Elena A. Fedchenko

    (Department of Financial Control and Treasury, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, 49 Leningradskiy Ave., 125993 Moscow, Russia)

  • Lyubov V. Gusarova

    (Department of Financial Control and Treasury, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, 49 Leningradskiy Ave., 125993 Moscow, Russia)

  • Margarita L. Vasyunina

    (Department of Public Finance, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, 49 Leningradskiy Ave., 125993 Moscow, Russia)

  • Alexander S. Lozhechko

    (Department of Public Finance, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, 49 Leningradskiy Ave., 125993 Moscow, Russia)

  • Anastasia A. Lysenko

    (Department of Financial Control and Treasury, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, 49 Leningradskiy Ave., 125993 Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

The activities of economic entities of the public sector in the conditions of uncertainty are associated with many risks, which manifest themselves in negative consequences, i.e., the lower effectiveness of executing assigned powers. Many subjective and objective factors influencing managerial decisions require the knowledge of methods for assessing and managing risks in order to reduce their consequences and achieve the strategic goals of economic entities. There is a promising theory of risk management that does not have the proper theoretical and methodological support, which limits its application. Currently, most studies are concerned with the feasibility of applying and adapting control mechanisms in the public sector. However, the theory of risk control, or risk management, is not considered by modern economists. The objective is to form a budget management mechanism in the Federal Treasury (regulatory body) as an element of risk control. The study considers the optimality and efficiency of the distribution of budgetary funds in the process of exercising the assigned budgetary powers by regulatory authorities and conducting a comprehensive analysis of causes and conditions that affect negative deviations from the standard values. The results of this study contribute to the body of knowledge about risk management, and the proposed approach can be used in similar studies in the public sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena A. Fedchenko & Lyubov V. Gusarova & Margarita L. Vasyunina & Alexander S. Lozhechko & Anastasia A. Lysenko, 2022. "The Mechanism of Budget Management as an Element of Risk Control in Regulatory Authorities," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:10:y:2022:i:9:p:177-:d:908271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/10/9/177/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/10/9/177/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Berend van der Kolk, 2019. "Management control packages: a literature review and guidelines for public sector research," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(7), pages 512-520, October.
    2. Felício, Teresa & Samagaio, António & Rodrigues, Ricardo, 2021. "Adoption of management control systems and performance in public sector organizations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 593-602.
    3. Bakhtiar Ostadi & Reza Zare, 2022. "Activity-based costing in the public sector and non-profit organisations: towards risk-based approach," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 35(1), pages 1-16.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Soufiane Kherrazi & Karim Saïd, 2022. "Managerial Practices Within Multilateral And Public-Funded R&D Collaborations," Post-Print hal-04205187, HAL.
    2. Hinrika Droege & Andrea Raggi & Tomás B. Ramos, 2021. "Overcoming Current Challenges for Circular Economy Assessment Implementation in Public Sector Organisations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-22, January.
    3. Ahmed Al Hebsi & Stephen Wilkins, 2022. "New Public Management in Abu Dhabi: Effects on Employee Loyalty, Organizational Citizenship Behaviors, and Work–Life Balance," Merits, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Felício, Teresa & Samagaio, António & Rodrigues, Ricardo, 2021. "Adoption of management control systems and performance in public sector organizations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 593-602.
    5. Tukiran, Martinus & Sunaryo, Widodo & Ghufron, Nurul & Rusli, Zil Irvan & Dalilah, Elih, 2022. "Public sector management: indispensable facilitating factors in sculpting organizational ambidexterity," MPRA Paper 113982, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 21 Mar 2022.
    6. Laurent Spang, 2024. "The evolution of the management control package (MCP) of a Caisse primaire d’assurance maladie (CPAM) over an extended period: Toward strategic alignment [L’évolution du package de systèmes de cont," Post-Print hal-04720336, HAL.
    7. Rouault, Julie & Albertini, Elisabeth, 2022. "Reconciling the social sector with external accountability requirements: Lessons from stewardship theory," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 485-498.
    8. Kamer-Ainur Aivaz & Ionela Florea Munteanu & Mari-Isabella Stan & Alina Chiriac, 2022. "A Multivariate Analysis of the Links between Transport Noncompliance and Financial Uncertainty in Times of COVID-19 Pandemics and War," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:10:y:2022:i:9:p:177-:d:908271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.