IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v14y2025i4p55-d1622171.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Growth, Yield, and Carbon Dioxide Emission After Cultivation of Five Edible Mushrooms

Author

Listed:
  • Preuk Chutimanukul

    (Department of Agricultural Technology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Thammasat University, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand
    Center of Excellence in Agriculture Innovation Centre Through Suply Chain and Value Chain, Thammasat University, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand)

  • Pawarisa Phetkaew

    (Department of Agricultural Technology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Thammasat University, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand)

  • Siripong Sukdee

    (Department of Agricultural Technology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Thammasat University, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand)

  • Ornprapa Thepsilvisut

    (Department of Agricultural Technology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Thammasat University, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand
    Center of Excellence in Agriculture Innovation Centre Through Suply Chain and Value Chain, Thammasat University, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand)

  • Hiroshi Ehara

    (International Center for Research and Education in Agriculture, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan)

Abstract

The increasing problem of carbon dioxide emissions has become a significant concern, with mushroom production identified as one of the contributing factors. This is because the mushroom production process emits carbon dioxide through respiration, and the carbon dioxide emitted by the mushrooms contributes to an increase in greenhouse gases. The carbon dioxide emitted by mushrooms can be utilized in various applications, such as supporting vegetable cultivation in greenhouses. However, the amount of carbon dioxide emitted by mushrooms varies. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the growth, yield, and carbon dioxide emissions in five edible mushrooms, namely Pleurotus pulmonarius , Lentinus squarrosulus , P. ostreatus , P. citrinopileatus , and P. cystidiosus . The experiment found that the fresh weight, dry weight, and biological efficiency percentage of P. ostreatus were the highest at 65.71, 11.18 g, and 28.22 percent, respectively. In contrast, the fresh weight, dry weight, and biological efficiency percentage of L. squarrosulus were the lowest, at 24.90, 3.80 g, and 9.90 percent, respectively. On the other hand, the carbon dioxide emitted from L. squarrosulus was the highest, ranging from 854.00 to 8369.67 ppm, while the carbon dioxide emitted from P. cystidiosus was the lowest, ranging from 606.00 to 861.00 ppm.

Suggested Citation

  • Preuk Chutimanukul & Pawarisa Phetkaew & Siripong Sukdee & Ornprapa Thepsilvisut & Hiroshi Ehara, 2025. "Comparison of Growth, Yield, and Carbon Dioxide Emission After Cultivation of Five Edible Mushrooms," Resources, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-7, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:55-:d:1622171
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/14/4/55/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/14/4/55/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:55-:d:1622171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.