IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v11y2022i2p13-d734974.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geoturist Evaluation of Geosites in the Tuchola Forest Biosphere Reserve (N Poland)

Author

Listed:
  • Arkadiusz Krawiec

    (Faculty of Earth Sciences and Spatial Management, Nicolaus Copernicus University, ul. Lwowska 1, 87-100 Toruń, Poland)

  • Włodzimierz Wysocki

    (Faculty of Earth Sciences and Spatial Management, Nicolaus Copernicus University, ul. Lwowska 1, 87-100 Toruń, Poland)

  • Izabela Jamorska

    (Faculty of Earth Sciences and Spatial Management, Nicolaus Copernicus University, ul. Lwowska 1, 87-100 Toruń, Poland)

  • Szymon Belzyt

    (Faculty of Earth Sciences and Spatial Management, Nicolaus Copernicus University, ul. Lwowska 1, 87-100 Toruń, Poland
    Institute of Geology, Adam Mickiewicz University, B. Krygowskiego 12, 61-680 Poznań, Poland)

Abstract

The geotourist evaluation of 32 geosites, including mineral deposits occurrence (1), petrological (12), sedimentological (2), and geomorphological (9), as well as hydrological and hydrogeological (8) sites, located in the area of Tuchola Forest Biosphere Reserve (TFBR), has been carried out. The study aims to provide a qualitative assessment of geodiversity via the evaluation of abiotic nature objects, as well as propose modifications in geotourist valuation criteria, for the purpose of applying it to the areas located in the Central European Plains. The evaluated geosites represent both perfect examples of typical features for the physiography of the TFBR, as a young glacial landscape, e.g., erratic boulders, glaciofluvial landforms, postglacial landforms, and lakes or peatbogs, as well as values proving the uniqueness of the area on both regional and international scales, e.g., disused underground lignite mine “Montania”. High scores of geotourist attractiveness (between 36 and 44 points) have been received by 14 evaluated geosites (1 mineral deposits occurrence geosite, 4 petrological geosites, 1 sedimentological geosite, and 5 geomorphological geosites, as well as 3 hydrological and hydrogeological geosites). The remaining 18 geosites have received a medium score (between 25 and 34 points). Three areas of high concentration of geosites, which overlap with the boundaries of Tuchola, Wdecki, and Zaborski (area of the greatest diversity of highly-ranked geosites) landscape parks, were distinguished. The authors proposed geosites that require improving their accessibility to enhance the geotourist attractiveness, recognized the necessity of marking out geotourist trails in the most attractive and diversified areas, and noticed the influence of extreme weather phenomena (whirwinds) on changes in the geotourist attractiveness of some geosites. It is believed that the results of the conducted evaluation may favorably affect the importance, position, and publicity of the whole area by supplementing the well-recognized biodiversity with the geodiversity presented in the study.

Suggested Citation

  • Arkadiusz Krawiec & Włodzimierz Wysocki & Izabela Jamorska & Szymon Belzyt, 2022. "Geoturist Evaluation of Geosites in the Tuchola Forest Biosphere Reserve (N Poland)," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-29, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:13-:d:734974
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/11/2/13/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/11/2/13/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jakub Skibiński & Kamil Kultys & Bogusława Baran-Zgłobicka & Wojciech Zgłobicki, 2021. "Geoparks in SE Poland as Areas of Tourism Development: Current State and Future Prospects," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-29, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miriam Edith Pérez-Romero & José Álvarez-García & Martha Beatriz Flores-Romero & Donaji Jiménez-Islas, 2023. "UNESCO Global Geoparks 22 Years after Their Creation: Analysis of Scientific Production," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Borut Stojilković, 2022. "Towards Transferable Use of Terrain Ruggedness Component in the Geodiversity Index," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Sylwia Sygar & Wojciech Zgłobicki, 2022. "Geoheritage Resources in Polish Landscape Parks as a Basis for Developing a Network of Geoparks," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:13-:d:734974. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.