IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v10y2021i10p106-d658721.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contribution of Soil Type to Quantity and Nutritional Value of Grass Species on the South African Highveld

Author

Listed:
  • Thabile Joyce Mokgakane

    (Department of Animal Science, School of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, North West University, Private Bag x2046, Mmabatho 2735, South Africa
    Nooitgedacht Research Station, Department of Agriculture, Rural Development, Land Administration and Environmental Affairs, Animal Research Directorate, Private Bag x9019, Ermelo 2350, South Africa)

  • Victor Mlambo

    (School of Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Sciences, University of Mpumalanga, Private Bag x11283, Mbombela 1200, South Africa)

  • Khuliso Emmanuel Ravhuhali

    (Department of Animal Science, School of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, North West University, Private Bag x2046, Mmabatho 2735, South Africa
    Food Security and Safety Niche Area, School of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, North-West University, Mmabatho 2735, South Africa)

  • Norman Magoro

    (Nooitgedacht Research Station, Department of Agriculture, Rural Development, Land Administration and Environmental Affairs, Animal Research Directorate, Private Bag x9019, Ermelo 2350, South Africa)

Abstract

The biggest threat to cattle production in most South African communal areas is poor management of grazing, which negatively affects vegetation and soil structures. This study was conducted to assess the spatial variation of grass species density, production potential and quality in Breyten (Hutton soil type), Davel (Avalon soil type), and Wesselton (Clovelly soil type) communal rangelands in the highveld region of Mpumalanga province. Three 100 m transects per grazing area, placed at 50 m intervals (0, 50, and 100 m) were used to collect soil samples at 200 mm depth. A 100 m permanent line point method, replicated three times (50 m apart) per site, was used to identify and collect grass species samples. Grass species were classified according to life form, palatability, ecological status, and abundance. Grasses species were also harvested for chemical composition and in vitro ruminal dry matter degradability determination. Soils from the study areas had an acidic pH range (3.5–4.5). Hutton soil had the highest ( p < 0.05) nitrate (N-NO 3 ) concentration (0.770 mg/kg) compared to Clovelly (0.030 mg/kg) and Avalon (0.533 mg/kg) soil types. Thirty-one grass species composed of 28 turf perennials, two weak perennials and one perennial creeping grass were identified across the study areas. About 16% of identified grass species were classified as highly palatable, 39% as moderately palatable, and 32% as unpalatable. Across all the soil types, Digitaria eriantha had the highest ( p < 0.05) crude protein (CP) (106.5 g/kg DM) content when compared to other grass species. In the Avalon soil type, D. eriantha had the lowest ( p < 0.05) neutral detergent fiber (NDF) (696.4 g/kg DM). Across all soils, D. eriantha , Aristida congesta , Eragrostis curvula , Eragrostis gummiflua , and Eragrostis plana grasses had the same ( p > 0.05) 48-h in vitro ruminal dry matter degradability Hutton soil had a higher proportion of common and dominant grass species as well as more palatable species with higher crude protein content than Avalon and Clovelly soils. However, for all three rangelands, there is a need for supplementary feeding to enhance the production efficiency of livestock given that the nutritive value of grasses was low.

Suggested Citation

  • Thabile Joyce Mokgakane & Victor Mlambo & Khuliso Emmanuel Ravhuhali & Norman Magoro, 2021. "Contribution of Soil Type to Quantity and Nutritional Value of Grass Species on the South African Highveld," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:10:y:2021:i:10:p:106-:d:658721
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/10/10/106/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/10/10/106/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:10:y:2021:i:10:p:106-:d:658721. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.