Author
Listed:
- María Jesús Santos
(Department of Applied Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Salamanca, 37008 Salamanca, Spain
Research Institute on Fundamental Physics and Mathematics, University of Salamanca, 37700 Salamanca, Spain
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Alejandro Medina
(Department of Applied Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Salamanca, 37008 Salamanca, Spain
Research Institute on Fundamental Physics and Mathematics, University of Salamanca, 37700 Salamanca, Spain
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- José Miguel Mateos Roco
(Department of Applied Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Salamanca, 37008 Salamanca, Spain
Research Institute on Fundamental Physics and Mathematics, University of Salamanca, 37700 Salamanca, Spain
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Araceli Queiruga-Dios
(Research Institute on Fundamental Physics and Mathematics, University of Salamanca, 37700 Salamanca, Spain
Department of Applied Mathematics, School of Industrial Engineering, University of Salamanca, 37008 Salamanca, Spain
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
Abstract
Sophomore students from the Chemical Engineering undergraduate Degree at the University of Salamanca are involved in a Mathematics course during the third semester and in an Engineering Thermodynamics course during the fourth one. When they participate in the latter they are already familiar with mathematical software and mathematical concepts about numerical methods, including non-linear equations, interpolation or differential equations. We have focused this study on the way engineering students learn Mathematics and Engineering Thermodynamics. As students use to learn each matter separately and do not associate Mathematics and Physics, they separate each matter into different and independent compartments. We have proposed an experience to increase the interrelationship between different subjects, to promote transversal skills, and to make the subjects closer to real work. The satisfactory results of the experience are exposed in this work. Moreover, we have analyzed the results obtained in both courses during the academic year 2018–2019. We found that there is a relation between both courses and student’s final marks do not depend on the course.
Suggested Citation
María Jesús Santos & Alejandro Medina & José Miguel Mateos Roco & Araceli Queiruga-Dios, 2021.
"Compartmental Learning versus Joint Learning in Engineering Education,"
Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-18, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:6:p:662-:d:520857
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:6:p:662-:d:520857. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.