Author
Listed:
- María José Madrid
(Faculty of Education, Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain)
- Alexander Maz-Machado
(Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Education, Universidad de Córdoba, 14071 Cordoba, Spain)
- Fernando Almaraz-Menéndez
(Faculty of Economics and Business, Universidad de Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain)
- Carmen León-Mantero
(Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Education, Universidad de Córdoba, 14071 Cordoba, Spain)
Abstract
Different studies consider the possibility of including history of mathematics in the classroom. However, its inclusion in the teaching and learning of mathematics depends on the conceptions of it that teachers have, among other factors. This study displays a comparative analysis between the opinions of primary education teachers-to-be and the opinions of mathematics teachers-to-be at secondary school and A-levels after the realization of an activity related to two historical or unusual multiplication methods. These trainee teachers were asked to identify the differences between these methods and the multiplication algorithm usually used in Spain. We collected these data and conducted an exploratory, descriptive and qualitative study. In order to analyse the information obtained, we used the technique content analysis. The answers given by these trainee teachers show their lack of knowledge about other multiplication methods and the various differences which they observed. These differences are mainly related to the structure of each method, the procedure and application of these methods and the mathematical processes carried out for each method. The comparison between the opinions of the teachers-to-be at different levels shows similarities but also some differences, probably due to the different mathematical knowledge they have.
Suggested Citation
María José Madrid & Alexander Maz-Machado & Fernando Almaraz-Menéndez & Carmen León-Mantero, 2021.
"Comparison between a Modern-Day Multiplication Method and Two Historical Ones by Trainee Teachers,"
Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-14, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:4:p:349-:d:496783
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:4:p:349-:d:496783. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.