IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v9y2021i2p171-d480905.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Study of Swarm Intelligence Algorithms for UCAV Path-Planning Problems

Author

Listed:
  • Haoran Zhu

    (School of Artificial Intelligence, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
    Current address: School of Artificial Intelligence, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China.
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Yunhe Wang

    (School of Computer Science and Technology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130117, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Zhiqiang Ma

    (School of Computer Science and Technology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130117, China)

  • Xiangtao Li

    (School of Artificial Intelligence, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China)

Abstract

Path-planning for uninhabited combat air vehicles (UCAV) is a typically complicated global optimization problem. It seeks a superior flight path in a complex battlefield environment, taking into various constraints. Many swarm intelligence (SI) algorithms have recently gained remarkable attention due to their capability to address complex optimization problems. However, different SI algorithms present various performances for UCAV path-planning since each algorithm has its own strengths and weaknesses. Therefore, this study provides an overview of different SI algorithms for UCAV path-planning research. In the experiment, twelve algorithms that published in major journals and conference proceedings are surveyed and then applied to UCAV path-planning. Moreover, to demonstrate the performance of different algorithms in further, we design different scales of problem cases for those comparative algorithms. The experimental results show that UCAV can find the safe path to avoid the threats efficiently based on most SI algorithms. In particular, the Spider Monkey Optimization is more effective and robust than other algorithms in handling the UCAV path-planning problem. The analysis from different perspectives contributes to highlight trends and open issues in the field of UCAVs.

Suggested Citation

  • Haoran Zhu & Yunhe Wang & Zhiqiang Ma & Xiangtao Li, 2021. "A Comparative Study of Swarm Intelligence Algorithms for UCAV Path-Planning Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-31, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:2:p:171-:d:480905
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/2/171/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/2/171/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hao-xiang Chen & Ying Nan & Yi Yang, 2018. "A Two-Stage Method for UCAV TF/TA Path Planning Based on Approximate Dynamic Programming," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-11, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:2:p:171-:d:480905. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.