IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v9y2021i23p3023-d688102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Socially Responsible Portfolio Selection: An Interactive Intuitionistic Fuzzy Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Yahya Hanine

    (Islamic Financial Engineering Laboratory (IFELAB), Laboratory of Applied Mathematical Studies and Research (LERMA), Mohammadia School of Engineering (EMI), Mohammed V University, Avenue Ibn Sina, Rabat 86154, Morocco)

  • Youssef Lamrani Alaoui

    (Multidisciplinary Research and Innovation Laboratory (LPRI), Moroccan School of Engineering Science (EMSI), Casablanca 20002, Morocco)

  • Mohamed Tkiouat

    (Islamic Financial Engineering Laboratory (IFELAB), Laboratory of Applied Mathematical Studies and Research (LERMA), Mohammadia School of Engineering (EMI), Mohammed V University, Avenue Ibn Sina, Rabat 86154, Morocco)

  • Younes Lahrichi

    (Laboratory of Research in Finance (LAREF), ISCAE Business School, Casablanca 29002, Morocco)

Abstract

In this study, we address the topic of sustainable and responsible portfolio investments (SRI). The selection of such portfolios is based, in addition to traditional financial variables, on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria. The interest of our approach resides in allowing socially responsible (SR) portfolio investors to select their optimal portfolios by considering their individual preferences for each objective and simultaneous definition of the degrees of acceptance and rejection. In particular, we consider socially responsible portfolio selection as an optimization problem with multiple objectives before applying interactive intuitionistic fuzzy method to solve the portfolio optimization. The robustness of our approach is tested through an empirical study on the top 10 Stocks for ESG values worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Yahya Hanine & Youssef Lamrani Alaoui & Mohamed Tkiouat & Younes Lahrichi, 2021. "Socially Responsible Portfolio Selection: An Interactive Intuitionistic Fuzzy Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(23), pages 1-13, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:23:p:3023-:d:688102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/23/3023/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/23/3023/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hallerbach, Winfried & Ning, Haikun & Soppe, Aloy & Spronk, Jaap, 2004. "A framework for managing a portfolio of socially responsible investments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(2), pages 517-529, March.
    2. Mijanur Rahaman Seikh & Prasun Kumar Nayak & Madhumangal Pal, 2013. "Notes on triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers," International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(4), pages 446-465.
    3. Nhi N.Y.Vo & Xue-Zhong He & Shaowu Liu & Guandong Xu, 2019. "Deep Learning for Decision Making and the Optimization of Socially Responsible Investments and Portfolio," Published Paper Series 2019-3, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney.
    4. Calvo, Clara & Ivorra, Carlos & Liern, Vicente, 2015. "Finding socially responsible portfolios close to conventional ones," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 52-63.
    5. Utz, Sebastian & Wimmer, Maximilian & Steuer, Ralph E., 2015. "Tri-criterion modeling for constructing more-sustainable mutual funds," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(1), pages 331-338.
    6. Utz, Sebastian & Wimmer, Maximilian & Hirschberger, Markus & Steuer, Ralph E., 2014. "Tri-criterion inverse portfolio optimization with application to socially responsible mutual funds," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 491-498.
    7. Gasser, Stephan M. & Rammerstorfer, Margarethe & Weinmayer, Karl, 2017. "Markowitz revisited: Social portfolio engineering," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(3), pages 1181-1190.
    8. Kaisa Miettinen & Jussi Hakanen & Dmitry Podkopaev, 2016. "Interactive Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization Methods," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Salvatore Greco & Matthias Ehrgott & José Rui Figueira (ed.), Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, edition 2, chapter 0, pages 927-976, Springer.
    9. Masoud Rahiminezhad Galankashi & Farimah Mokhatab Rafiei & Maryam Ghezelbash, 2020. "Portfolio selection: a fuzzy-ANP approach," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-34, December.
    10. Yuanyuan Zhang & Xiang Li & Sini Guo, 2018. "Portfolio selection problems with Markowitz’s mean–variance framework: a review of literature," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 125-158, June.
    11. Clara Calvo & Carlos Ivorra & Vicente Liern, 2016. "Fuzzy portfolio selection with non-financial goals: exploring the efficient frontier," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 245(1), pages 31-46, October.
    12. Gao-Feng Yu & Deng-Feng Li & De-Cui Liang & Guang-Xu Li, 2021. "An Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multi-Objective Goal Programming Approach to Portfolio Selection," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(05), pages 1477-1497, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arisona Lestari Billah, 2024. "Advancing ESG Portfolio Optimization: Methods, Progress, and Future Directions," GATR Journals afr236, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. K. Liagkouras & K. Metaxiotis & G. Tsihrintzis, 2022. "Incorporating environmental and social considerations into the portfolio optimization process," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(2), pages 1493-1518, September.
    2. A. Garcia-Bernabeu & J. V. Salcedo & A. Hilario & D. Pla-Santamaria & Juan M. Herrero, 2019. "Computing the Mean-Variance-Sustainability Nondominated Surface by ev-MOGA," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-12, December.
    3. Eduardo C. Garrido-Merch'an & Gabriel Gonz'alez Piris & Maria Coronado Vaca, 2023. "Bayesian Optimization of ESG Financial Investments," Papers 2303.01485, arXiv.org.
    4. Fernando García & Jairo González-Bueno & Javier Oliver & Nicola Riley, 2019. "Selecting Socially Responsible Portfolios: A Fuzzy Multicriteria Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, April.
    5. Florian Methling & Rüdiger Nitzsch, 2019. "Thematic portfolio optimization: challenging the core satellite approach," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 33(2), pages 133-154, June.
    6. Bilbao-Terol, Amelia & Álvarez-Otero, Susana & Bilbao-Terol, Celia & Cañal-Fernández, Verónica, 2017. "Hedonic evaluation of the SRI label of mutual funds using matching methodology," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 213-227.
    7. Salo, Ahti & Doumpos, Michalis & Liesiö, Juuso & Zopounidis, Constantin, 2024. "Fifty years of portfolio optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(1), pages 1-18.
    8. Fredy Pokou & Jules Sadefo Kamdem & François Benhmad, 2024. "Empirical Performance of an ESG Assets Portfolio from US Market," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 64(3), pages 1569-1638, September.
    9. Gallucci, Carmen & Santulli, Rosalia & Lagasio, Valentina, 2022. "The conceptualization of environmental, social and governance risks in portfolio studies A systematic literature review," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    10. Tatarnikova, Olga & Duchêne, Sébastien & Sentis, Patrick & Willinger, Marc, 2023. "Portfolio instability and socially responsible investment: Experiments with financial professionals and students," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    11. Gaganis, Chrysovalantis & Pasiouras, Fotios & Tasiou, Menelaos & Zopounidis, Constantin, 2021. "CISEF: A composite index of social, environmental and financial performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(1), pages 394-409.
    12. Wu, Qun & Liu, Xinwang & Qin, Jindong & Zhou, Ligang & Mardani, Abbas & Deveci, Muhammet, 2022. "An integrated multi-criteria decision-making and multi-objective optimization model for socially responsible portfolio selection," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    13. Panos Xidonas & Eric Essner, 2024. "On ESG Portfolio Construction: A Multi-Objective Optimization Approach," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 63(1), pages 21-45, January.
    14. Schlütter, Sebastian & Fianu, Emmanuel Senyo & Gründl, Helmut, 2022. "Responsible investments in life insurers' optimal portfolios under solvency constraints," ICIR Working Paper Series 45/22, Goethe University Frankfurt, International Center for Insurance Regulation (ICIR).
    15. Drago, Carlo & Di Nallo, Loris & Russotto, Maria Lucetta, 2023. "Social Sustainability in European Banks: A Machine Learning Approach using Interval- Based Composite Indicators," FEEM Working Papers 336986, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    16. Yue Qi, 2018. "On outperforming social-screening-indexing by multiple-objective portfolio selection," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 267(1), pages 493-513, August.
    17. Mónica García-Melón & Blanca Pérez-Gladish & Tomás Gómez-Navarro & Paz Mendez-Rodriguez, 2016. "Assessing mutual funds’ corporate social responsibility: a multistakeholder-AHP based methodology," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 244(2), pages 475-503, September.
    18. Azra Zaimovic & Adna Omanovic & Almira Arnaut-Berilo, 2021. "How Many Stocks Are Sufficient for Equity Portfolio Diversification? A Review of the Literature," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-30, November.
    19. Utz, Sebastian & Wimmer, Maximilian & Steuer, Ralph E., 2015. "Tri-criterion modeling for constructing more-sustainable mutual funds," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(1), pages 331-338.
    20. Cabello, J.M. & Ruiz, F. & Pérez-Gladish, B. & Méndez-Rodríguez, P., 2014. "Synthetic indicators of mutual funds’ environmental responsibility: An application of the Reference Point Method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(1), pages 313-325.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:23:p:3023-:d:688102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.