IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v9y2021i17p2155-d628729.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Method of Image Quality Assessment for Text Recognition on Camera-Captured and Projectively Distorted Documents

Author

Listed:
  • Julia Shemiakina

    (Smart Engines Service LLC, 117312 Moscow, Russia)

  • Elena Limonova

    (Smart Engines Service LLC, 117312 Moscow, Russia
    Federal Research Center Computer Science and Control RAS, 119333 Moscow, Russia
    Department of Innovation and High Technology, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, 117303 Moscow, Russia)

  • Natalya Skoryukina

    (Smart Engines Service LLC, 117312 Moscow, Russia
    Federal Research Center Computer Science and Control RAS, 119333 Moscow, Russia)

  • Vladimir V. Arlazarov

    (Smart Engines Service LLC, 117312 Moscow, Russia
    Federal Research Center Computer Science and Control RAS, 119333 Moscow, Russia)

  • Dmitry P. Nikolaev

    (Smart Engines Service LLC, 117312 Moscow, Russia
    Institute for Information Transmission Problems (Kharkevich Institute) RAS, 127051 Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the problem of identity document recognition in images captured with a mobile device camera. A high level of projective distortion leads to poor quality of the restored text images and, hence, to unreliable recognition results. We propose a novel, theoretically based method for estimating the projective distortion level at a restored image point. On this basis, we suggest a new method of binary quality estimation of projectively restored field images. The method analyzes the projective homography only and does not depend on the image size. The text font and height of an evaluated field are assumed to be predefined in the document template. This information is used to estimate the maximum level of distortion acceptable for recognition. The method was tested on a dataset of synthetically distorted field images. Synthetic images were created based on document template images from the publicly available dataset MIDV-2019. In the experiments, the method shows stable predictive values for different strings of one font and height. When used as a pre-recognition rejection method, it demonstrates a positive predictive value of 86.7% and a negative predictive value of 64.1% on the synthetic dataset. A comparison with other geometric quality assessment methods shows the superiority of our approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia Shemiakina & Elena Limonova & Natalya Skoryukina & Vladimir V. Arlazarov & Dmitry P. Nikolaev, 2021. "A Method of Image Quality Assessment for Text Recognition on Camera-Captured and Projectively Distorted Documents," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(17), pages 1-22, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:17:p:2155-:d:628729
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/17/2155/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/17/2155/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:17:p:2155-:d:628729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.